When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Both the 6.0L & 7.0L engines are referred to as 'small-blocks'. That would seem to indicate displacement is not what 'small' is defined by?
In the 'olden' days, most manufacturers, including Chevy, had two families of engines, big and small. For Chevy, this meant the 'mouse' motors (265, 283, 302, 327, 350, 400 et al) and the 'rat' motors (396, 427, 454, et al). The displacement was not the only indicator; the size of the engine was different, as well. The small block, then, refers to the smaller mouse motor family, and the big block was the rat motors.
Mopar had the 273/318/340 small blocks and the 360/383/426/440 big blocks. Ford had the 221/260/289/302/351 small blocks and the 352/390/406/427/460 big blocks.
Thinking back to when I was young.. ... I remember my dad's '56 Bel Air that had a "small block" 265 Then he traded it for a '59 Impala that had a "big block" 348 ... then a '65 Impala 327, 300hp "small".. then a '67 Caprice 396, 325hp "big"..
...the LS2 has a hell of a pedigree, don't you think??
So it has more to do with the physical size of the engine then (i.e. packaging)?
Yes. They were smaller external dimensions, but not always smaller displacement. BTW - the 'big blocks' of today are pretty much only found in heavy duty trucks.
In the 'olden' days, most manufacturers, including Chevy, had two families of engines, big and small. For Chevy, this meant the 'mouse' motors (265, 283, 302, 327, 350, 400 et al) and the 'rat' motors (396, 427, 454, et al). The displacement was not the only indicator; the size of the engine was different, as well. The small block, then, refers to the smaller mouse motor family, and the big block was the rat motors.
Mopar had the 273/318/340 small blocks and the 360/383/426/440 big blocks. Ford had the 221/260/289/302/351 small blocks and the 352/390/406/427/460 big blocks.
You forgot a few - the Chevy 305, 307, 402 and 409 and wasn't the Mopar 360 just a bored 340 small block (I could be wrong)
I thought in addition to bore spacing, it also referred to the ability to overbore the engine. Small blocks were limited to a 2X overbore, the big blocks could go 4X as well as accept a stroker kit to create mountain motors. Good times, good times.
The big blocks also were generally higher torque engines that would produce a lot of low end and were a little less higher rpm engines than the mouse motors. The big blocks were also known to blow up much easier. They just didnt seem to take the high rpm's as well as the high reving smallblocks. I has a big block Camaro and a big block Monte Carlo and Impala. Those were the good ole days. It's hard to beat the new technology.....that's why I am in the C6 section...only a matter of time til one will be sitting in the garage. I cant wait to get the 400 hp with an automatic and Z-51 package.
The term is "historical" in its origin, and I don't know that it has a precise meaning these days. I first heard the term in the '60s applied to the smaller V-8 engines. Displacement of these engines was in the 300-390 cubic inch range. The major manufacturer all had engines in this displacement range. They also had some bigger engines -- well over 400 cubic inches that were refered to as "big block" and other names.
Today's Corvette 6.0 liter engine is in the "small block" displacement range, and it more or less evolved from that series of engines. Since it is one of the biggest displacement engines in a passenger car today, it seems pretty strange to call it "small block," but 35-40 years ago, it would have been a small to medium sized V-8.
Mopar had the 273/318/340 small blocks and the 360/383/426/440 big blocks. Ford had the 221/260/289/302/351 small blocks and the 352/390/406/427/460 big blocks.
I thought Ford (circa 1968) had 3 sizes for blocks: small {260/289/302} medium {350,351, 38x} big {390,406,427,428,460}
I thought Ford (circa 1968) had 3 sizes for blocks: small {260/289/302} medium {350,351, 38x} big {390,406,427,428,460}
Sorta. There was a deck height difference on some versions of the 351, but it was basically the small block. The 352 was the big block. (There was also a 332 big block.)
You forgot a few - the Chevy 305, 307, 402 and 409 and wasn't the Mopar 360 just a bored 340 small block (I could be wrong)
That's why I said 'et al' after the listings; there were more.
Also, the 348/409 were a totally different family that came from the Chevy/GMC truck line. In the day, we referred to them as the E-block, because of the shape of the block at the deck (it looked like an 'E').
I'm pretty sure the Mopar 360 was a big block, but I'd never stake my life on it. You could be right....
The reason they made the big blocks was just not for more cubic inches, they needed the bigger bores for bigger valves, that was the only way they could increase the HP then. Now we can get more HP in a small block. It's truly amazing what we are doing now days with 2 OHV engines!