When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
...It may well be that i am missing something but I am puzzle by the fuzz around MP3 while at the same time some complain about the Bose sytem being crappy....IMHO MP3 compression is far from helping...It may be a choice between sound quality VS commodity of having 743 songs on the same CD...feel free to flame me if I deserve it... a 6 cd stacker just do it for me...
I just got the software update on my 2005 nav coupe and I've had a chance to listen to MP3s in it. I've got to say that to my ears they don't sound any different than CDs, which is to say "pretty good, but nowhere near audiophile quality". Do I think it's worthwhile? You bet. To gain the ability to get 200+ tracks on a single disc without having to pay for new hardware is absolutely worthwhile. It will add a whole new dimension to producing my own music compilations.
I just got the software update on my 2005 nav coupe and I've had a chance to listen to MP3s in it. I've got to say that to my ears they don't sound any different than CDs, which is to say "pretty good, but nowhere near audiophile quality". Do I think it's worthwhile? You bet. To gain the ability to get 200+ tracks on a single disc without having to pay for new hardware is absolutely worthwhile. It will add a whole new dimension to producing my own music compilations.
I have the regular ONE cd head unit and I have a new IPOD plugged in. It works good but yeah, you are right, the sound quality is not the same as CD's. There has to be something to make this better becuase it is more convinient to have 1000 songs available like that, but if sound sucks, sometimes I think it's not worth it.
...It may well be that i am missing something but I am puzzle by the fuzz around MP3 while at the same time some complain about the Bose sytem being crappy....IMHO MP3 compression is far from helping...It may be a choice between sound quality VS commodity of having 743 songs on the same CD...feel free to flame me if I deserve it... a 6 cd stacker just do it for me...
If you have 743 songs on one CD, you have WAY too much compression and it will sound like crap. At a compression rate of about 128kbps, it sounds pretty good. I get about 150 songs on a disk at that rate.
The quality is a function of the bit rate the ripper used to convert it to a MP3 file. Generally, if it is 128Kbit or higher the sound is about equal to CD.s 256kbit is really good, but the files are twice as big. 128Kbit is usually a good compromise.
Of course, some people have better ears than others also.
I just got the software update on my 2005 nav coupe and I've had a chance to listen to MP3s in it. I've got to say that to my ears they don't sound any different than CDs, which is to say "pretty good, but nowhere near audiophile quality". Do I think it's worthwhile? You bet. To gain the ability to get 200+ tracks on a single disc without having to pay for new hardware is absolutely worthwhile. It will add a whole new dimension to producing my own music compilations.
I can tell a SMALL difference between MP3s at 128 and the same song on a CD - but the difference is barely noticable.
However, the difference in the sound system in my Vette (the BLOSE) vs that in my Jeep Grand Cherokee is a BIG difference - even my wife notices it ...
so you are correct - by using MP3s we are indeed making a somewhat iffy sound system even worse - but only by a very small degree.
I like others will plan to upgrade the speakers in my vette this spring - I hear that will make a noticeable difference.
...It may well be that i am missing something but I am puzzle by the fuzz around MP3 while at the same time some complain about the Bose sytem being crappy....IMHO MP3 compression is far from helping...It may be a choice between sound quality VS commodity of having 743 songs on the same CD...feel free to flame me if I deserve it... a 6 cd stacker just do it for me...
You ARE missing something. First, the compression algorhythms have flexibility where you can trade off fidelity for file size. Second, there are more than one compresion system that can be used. I use an RCA Lyra and a w4a compression routine that sounds better to my ears when pumped through my Pioneer 6 speaker surround sound system at home. You can experiment yourself with a couple of settings within a file format, and then again with one of the other compression routines that your player can use. When you cannot tell the difference, run with what you have at the best fidelity level without overkill. A couple megabits of storage will take you across country in your vette without a repeat and excellent fidelity. Memory is cheap, getting cheaper and digital music will not ever return to CD's in my house
You ARE missing something. First, the compression algorhythms have flexibility where you can trade off fidelity for file size. Second, there are more than one compresion system that can be used. I use an RCA Lyra and a w4a compression routine that sounds better to my ears when pumped through my Pioneer 6 speaker surround sound system at home. You can experiment yourself with a couple of settings within a file format, and then again with one of the other compression routines that your player can use. When you cannot tell the difference, run with what you have at the best fidelity level without overkill. A couple megabits of storage will take you across country in your vette without a repeat and excellent fidelity. Memory is cheap, getting cheaper and digital music will not ever return to CD's in my house