When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Just another gray haired old fart in a Corvette.
G Meter accuracy??
I was on a two lane on ramp yesterday and wanted to pass an 18 wheeler before merging onto the freeway. I whipped up the horses and leaned into the corner pretty good but still well under control. After coming up on the freeway I recalled the G meter reading and it read .91 g’s. No way, is this thing accurate?
I think that it is mostly for fun. You get a reading if you are sitting still on a ramp, at an angle.
Gravity is an acceleration force just as much as cornering is. If you're on a surface that is not latitudinally flat then you should get a lateral acceleration reading even parked.
I was on a two lane on ramp yesterday and wanted to pass an 18 wheeler before merging onto the freeway. I whipped up the horses and leaned into the corner pretty good but still well under control. After coming up on the freeway I recalled the G meter reading and it read .91 g’s. No way, is this thing accurate?
You should be able to handle .91G's with the stock suspension according to GM. The Z51 is rated at .98 G's. I pulled .89 with my stock suspension C5 using a G-tech pro to measure it.
It also follows that if the car can pull 1 g, you should be able to set it on the side of a concrete wall and it should stay there!
Not quite If it's sideways, there's no force pulling the car to the concrete. In a flat turn, you've still got 1g of force pulling the car and the concrete together, which is how it generates friction.
I have no idea whether the g-meter in the Corvette has multiple axis accelerometers or not. If it does then the effects of not being on level ground should already be factored out. If it doesn't then worrying about the accuracy is a waste of time since the meter is about useless for any percise measurements since there are few places on the roads that are perfectly flat. Even drag strips usually go up or down some and they all have a slight crown (less than the public roads) to help drainage.
I have no idea whether the g-meter in the Corvette has multiple axis accelerometers or not. If it does then the effects of not being on level ground should already be factored out. If it doesn't then worrying about the accuracy is a waste of time since the meter is about useless for any percise measurements since there are few places on the roads that are perfectly flat. Even drag strips usually go up or down some and they all have a slight crown (less than the public roads) to help drainage.
The Vette only has yaw and lateral accelerometers and that's really all it needs. Yaw shouldn't be affected by orientation and the lateral G meter shouldn't factor out the level of the ground as the lateral component of gravitys acceleration should always be considered in addition to the cars lateral acceleration.
I'd expect the g-meter to be pretty accurate since the technology is very mature. During the Cold War, and before GPS, spy planes used to navigate solely by g-meters, and they did very well from what I've heard.
I was on a two lane on ramp yesterday and wanted to pass an 18 wheeler before merging onto the freeway. I whipped up the horses and leaned into the corner pretty good but still well under control. After coming up on the freeway I recalled the G meter reading and it read .91 g’s. No way, is this thing accurate?
From: Just another gray haired old fart in a Corvette.
Originally Posted by C6 DVL
how do you do that?
While in one of the track modes just push and hold the page button for 5 seconds and it will recall the highest reading since power up. You don’t even have to be in track mode in the corner.
While in one of the track modes just push and hold the page button for 5 seconds and it will recall the highest reading since power up. You don’t even have to be in track mode in the corner.
The Vette only has yaw and lateral accelerometers and that's really all it needs. Yaw shouldn't be affected by orientation and the lateral G meter shouldn't factor out the level of the ground as the lateral component of gravitys acceleration should always be considered in addition to the cars lateral acceleration.
In general that is not true. To get accurate information which doesn't include body roll and front to back or back to front squat you really need a three axis system.
As an example if you have a drag car that wheel stands a simple lateral accelerometer would read much higher forward acceleration then the car was actually making down the track. Same thing is true for body roll.
This may all be a little picky but the original question was how accurate the G- meter was.
As an example if you have a drag car that wheel stands a simple lateral accelerometer would read much higher forward acceleration then the car was actually making down the track. Same thing is true for body roll.
This may all be a little picky but the original question was how accurate the G- meter was.
It would take more body roll than you will get in a C6 to cause a 1% error. Steeply banked corners are a bit more of a problem.