When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Several people were complaining way back when, about the push-pull configuration on the paddle shiffter. Most said it would be more intuitive to have one side pull for UP and the other side pull for DOWN. Has anybody managed to do this yet. Or does somebody have the wiring diagrams so I can try to figure it out? I am hoping it is just a matter of pushing a couple of pins and switching them.
This will be my first mod. Who ever at GM that thought the original design was a good idea, never drove a car with a true paddle setup. Heck they must have never even drove a racing simulator. I plan to make the right paddle (both directions) up shift and left (both directions) down shift.
Not familar with the new GM set up, can some one tell us how other cars with paddle shifters work?
Tom
Years past there were a lot of "sided" paddles. One side for upshift and one side for down shifting.
GM promised this configuration is ergonomic! I agree. I have found it to be very easy to manipulate at all steering points in turns. Also have seen most newer models with paddles one example is Mercedes who have the same setup as GM push / pull on either pdaale.
Personally, I like the current setup except that the paddles are too small, especially the tiny upshift button. Works good on a road course where you can keep your hands in the same place on the wheel; but a real PITA for autocross- trying to find the dang button for an upshift while winding the wheel back to center after a tight corner.
What I need is a much larger upshift button. That wouldn't require any rewiring, just making something that could be attached to the existing button.
I have no problem and actually like the A6 paddle shift push for up and pull for down in HPDE, but this is the only system I have used and it is now "brain wired" and seems natural, especially the ability to shift up or down with either hand. But I understand others may prefer a different set up. Wouldn't separate paddles make autoX more difficult with only one paddle up and one down??
IMHO I think it should have console shifting ( ala XLR/STS) and paddles. (Would a MN6 guy want to shift from the column )
You are right, there is no macho testsoterone energy in pushing a little paddle on the column as compared to heel and toe burble downshift to third with hand on the shifter on the console as God intended. But when you are working the brakes and focused on hitting a perfect line, it is convenient not to have to dance on all the pedals, take one hand off the wheel and pay attention to get the shift right. I'm just glad I know the thrill of the old way of shifting that the younger guys will miss out on as the paddle shift (now on Ferrari, M-B and soon probably on all high performance cars) becomes the only choice. But I missed out on gapping spark plugs with match book cover and survived OK!!
From: Mtns of north Georgia - Hey Kids, I'm spending your inheritance!
Originally Posted by Hoonose
My daughters Mini Cooper S auto works the opposite way.
Accelerating you are pressed back into your seat, it's natural to pull up for upshifts.
Decelerating you tend to go forward in your seat, it's natural to push down to downshift.
I bought a Lexus GS400 with "trigger finger shifting" when they came out in '98. It worked the same way as the Mini Cooper - pull toward you for upshift, push away for downshift. Seemed natural. After four years of that, everything else feels "backwards" and confusing.
I have no issue with the C6 paddles as they are, but IMO it would "feel" better with the paddles almost as they are in appearance and placement, but with no upshift area.
Both would be pull paddles with one downshifting and the other upshifting.
I'm lucky to have a fair amount of seat time in a Modena 360 F1 and I sometimes find myself downshifting when I wanted to upshift in my Vette.
I don't use the paddles much anyway, but a revision would be nice.
Yep. F1 style is the way to go. If there was a better way they would have gone to it to win races. Pull on the right to upshift, pull on the left to downshift.
But I do agree w/ the autoxer above, doesn't work so well when you're turning lock-lock. An F1 wheel only runs 90 degrees so you never move your hands.
Yep. F1 style is the way to go. If there was a better way they would have gone to it to win races. Pull on the right to upshift, pull on the left to downshift.
But I do agree w/ the autoxer above, doesn't work so well when you're turning lock-lock. An F1 wheel only runs 90 degrees so you never move your hands.
Some drivers like paddles that are fixed to the steering column vs wheel.
A better shifting paradigm might be mental telepathy!
But seeing that it doesn't work, the next best might be voice activated shifting.
I had a game add-on years ago called 'game commander'. Using a microphone and headset, you would just speak a command or ask for a particular weapon while in a game with instant results. That sort of gizmo could make those racing cameras 'in the car' viewing more interesting.
I thought most if not all the cars electrics use a CAN line to the computer. If this is the case I don't believe you can switch wires. I don't like the auto lag. Under high acceleration if you wait till your almost at red line on the tach you drive the engine into fuel cutoff. I have complained to the GM engineers about that and the agree. I hope that come out with a customer fix.