Diminished Value

I highly doubt that most dealers or most individuals would "value" your car any less than the appraised face value after inspecting it for evidence of collision...maybe I should read the other thread. Anyone using a report (Carmax?) to devalue a vehicle for repaired collision damage is attempting to leverage a cheap buy to steal the car IMO. My personal opinion is that use of those reports is not prevalent enough to reduce the value of cars with prior collision damage, but I could be wrong.
Last edited by JmpnJckFlsh; Jul 30, 2006 at 11:26 PM.
Sorry to hear about the damage to your car. I had quite a few replies in my thread http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...minished+value of members who actually collected diminished value clamis from their wrecks. I though I was going to have to seek the same, but our insurance totaled the car and paid off fully to us.
You would be going after the other guys insurance for this and your company may or may not help you. There is even some companys on the web that do this service. I felt the same, most buyers of a vette would be savy enough to get a carfax report and you may get screwed unless it details as very minor.
Good luck, Greg
We went to a dealer and had them appraise our car (G35) after an accident. The car was perfect before the accident (1.5 yr old, 6k miles, mint), they did the servicing. We had them detail in the appraisal any reason they deminished the value of the car. Then took it to carmax, and another dealer. All three said the same thing, that repair work was evident. Appraisals were between $1.6k-$3k off of KBB top trade.
We then presented their insurance co. with the appraisals, as well as a letter explaining our concern that we could be held liable later by our lease co. for deminished value. Initially they told us to pound sand. Then said our state (VA) didnt have an accepted formula so they wanted to use georgia's formula and offered $319. Took a couple of counter offers and major strong arming before we finally settled on $1900.
Hope this helps
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Sorry to hear about the damage to your car. I had quite a few replies in my thread http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...minished+value of members who actually collected diminished value clamis from their wrecks. I though I was going to have to seek the same, but our insurance totaled the car and paid off fully to us.
You would be going after the other guys insurance for this and your company may or may not help you. There is even some companys on the web that do this service. I felt the same, most buyers of a vette would be savy enough to get a carfax report and you may get screwed unless it details as very minor.
Good luck, Greg
I am happy to hear everything worked out for you after that horrendous accident. The car was a mess. the main thing is no one was hurt. Thanks for your support.
You do need to realize that most insurance companies will not readily pay this amount and will tell you that you're not entitled to it. So be patient and persistent.
Last edited by trumpet; Jul 31, 2006 at 11:08 PM.
October 24, 2003
In overturning a lower court ruling, the Texas Supreme Court has ruled that insurance contracts do not require an insurer to pay a policyholder for the vehicle's so-called diminished value.
In the case of American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co., et al v. Schaefer, Gary Schaefer filed a class action lawsuit against several insurance companies seeking a ruling that personal auto policies cover diminished value. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer, but the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Judicial District reversed that decision.
"The Texas Supreme Court correctly ruled that the contract language is clear-cut and does not require the payment for diminished value when a vehicle has been fully and adequately repaired," said Donald Hanson, southwestern regional manager for the National Association of Independent Insurers (NAII).
The court said that to expand the ordinary meaning of repair to include an intangible, diminished value element would ignore the policy's language or give the contract's text a meaning it never intended. In addition, the court took into account arguments advanced in an amicus brief filed by NAII that cited the Texas Department of Insurance bulletin as well as numerous other state court decisions that state an insurer is not obligated to pay for diminished value.
Within the last few years there have been numerous court decisions supporting insurers on the issue of diminished value. State supreme and appellate courts in Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, Missouri, South Carolina, and Wisconsin have recently addressed the issue and ruled that diminished value is not recoverable.
"Earlier this year the South Carolina Supreme Court rejected the diminished value argument. Now with this decision, Texas is in the mainstream regarding the issue. As in Texas, most of these caseshave been dismissed based on clear, unambiguous policy language," said Hanson.
The bastich runs this route all the time and knew there was a constant monster backup for that exit and waited until the very last second to squeeze the rig in. The lane stopped dead and he kept coming across.
I was thinking about going after Safeway for the "Diminished Value"
Here's my quick story. Owned an 02 Z06, worth (before the accident) about30 to 33K ..got hit, 15 thousand dollars in repair later, car was appraised in the low 20's ..two dealers offered 20K only due to the accident, frame damage included. Hired a local diminished value company in Georgia, cost about 300 bucks, walked me thru the process of demanding diminished value from the insurance company of the party that hit me. Ended up settling for 46 hundred bucks, which was certainly better than nothing, we asked for 65 hundred and the insurance company's initial offer was 12 hundred, so definitly go after it. Here's the company I used and they can help.
http://www.collisionclaims.com/
doug

Also, insurances companies will usually try getting out of liability at every opportunity. Be careful about cashing any checks they give you. Sometimes they will put fine print on the check stating that once you cash it you release all liability from the insurance company. This happened to me and luckily I caught it and refused the check. Because that initial check they gave me would have only covered about 25% of the final bill. Had I signed it, I would've been hosed. Insurance companies have all kinds of sneaky ways of getting out of taking care of business. So, be patient, persistent and read everything throughly before signing. Remember you're in charge of what happens to you car, not them.
FWIW, I was also able to get the insurance company to pay my monthly car payments and insurance payments during the 4 1/2 months my car was in the shop. Also not everyone has the right personality to be confrontational with the insurance company and others may not want to deal with all the stress that can be involved. If that's the case, find a good lawyer. At one point, I told the insurance company if the didn't take care of business I was going to turn everything over to a lawyer and then they could pay my legal bills in addition to all the repairs, car payments etc. They really started taking care of me after that. But, you should not make a threat like that unless you are willing to go thru with it. I had a lawyer sitting in the wings waiting to pounce if needed. Luckily, I didn't need him.
Last edited by trumpet; Aug 3, 2006 at 10:57 PM.
That's incorrect DV does not vary by state. See my earlier thread...
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1437212
I collected it. It's not something insurance companies are very forthcomming with, but it's a valid and collectable item.
Here are the ground rules:
It must be a third party claim. Meaning someone has to hit you and they have to be 100% liable for the accident. It can not be a 1st party claim (comp or collision) - this is the area where various states have rulings. There is no state that has statute or precedent law regarding 3rd party claims. Further some state insurance commissioners have even issued bulletins recognizing 3rd party DV. There is also a possibility for DV under un-insured motorist section.
Be very clear there is no DV if your trying to collect from your insurance (contract law), it has to be the other fella's insurance (tort law) - actually it doesn't have to be the other fella's insurance, the key is what a judge would award if you sue the person who caused the accident and that's a broader brush than insurance wants to discuss to include loss of use, etc.
Lastly, you may be told you have to "realize the loss" (sell the car) for it to be a valid claim - that's BS.
If my thread doesn't give you all you need to get started, pm me.




















