Corvette interior
Several of the items mentioned in posts above would certainly be nice – but I am satisfied with the comfort, functionality & appearance. For the price.
And at close to 5,000 miles, no squeaks, rattles, or groans that would indicate anything not screwed ( glued, welded ) together properly in the interior or the underlying structures.
- Ray
Happy C6 driver . . .
Let's have some perspective here. Do you really want Chevy to build it heavier and cost more money? I'm sure they can, and then many here would be just reading the forum and not participating in car ownership.I don't like some aspects of the interior either and even though I don't have the car yet, some of my new interior pieces are already here, on the bench and waiting for installation when the car comes home.
That's the beauty of the 'Vette. Chevy has made a world class sports car available to a large segment of people. Based on volume, the aftermarket people can afford to develop products and again because of volume, price them reasonably.
This allows for a broad spectrum of people to engage in the experience. Some can get their "dream car" by ordering a 1LT and have payments that are affordable and if Chevy made the car more expensive with all the things some people want, it would price the car out of reach for some.
For others that want all the bells and whistles and the checkbook to back it up, you can have it too. Just buy your 'vette, do a bit of surfing to fix it up and you're happy to. What's the difference between paying for those parts from Chevy or from an aftermarket vendor? Face it, you're going to spend the money either way. This way, it doesn't price the other guy out of the car.
Everybody wins. The working man gets his dream car, the executive still gets exactly what he wants, Chevy makes money, the aftermarket people make money and it brings all walks of people together to share the experience.
If you don't like that arrangement, then go buy some "elite" foreign sports car that costs several times what it's worth. They'll make sure you pay out the nose for that billet shift gate and carbon fiber dash surround and after paying all that money, you'll still have to worry about some guy in a Z06 or a modded C6 go BLOWING by you in a car that costs a fraction of what you paid.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The Corvette probably has a more diverse demographic group than any other sports car. Some people only care about the engine and would be happy if the interior was comprised of two plastic lawn chairs. Others expect more refinement and would like America’s best to be at least as good as the foreign competition. It’s a pride thing. Some would gladly pay more for refinement and many already can’t afford the car.
GM needs to accommodate everyone with interior options. Please offer plastic lawn chairs for those that don’t want more and provide a refined interior equal to the competition for those willing to pay.
The Defenders talk about performance for the dollar when they excuse or minimize the C6 complaints. This is one area they can not excuse.
These must be the poorest designed seats in any car that purports to be a sportscar, at any price. I have the "Sports Seats" but they have minimal support, minimal adjustment, no lumbar adjust, no thigh bolster adjustment. The seat bottoms are simply too short for me to feel comfortable or supported. I had better seats in my '69 vette. The C6 is such a amazing performance car, and such a performance improvement over my '69 that the seats used are unexplainable.
The best seats I have experienced were in my 330i ZHP package. Good side and lateral support, a good range of adjustment, more leg room that the vette. My favorite, thigh bolsters that extended to several positions. Adjusting the seat bottom does not affect the seat back position... This in an admittedly overpriced BMW, but it was more than $10,000 cheaper than my C6. The seats in my son's WRX are better that the vette.
I won't complain about the materials used in the interior, they do not affect performance to any real degree. I love the dash and the DIC. I love the factory NAV.
Just don't tell me that the seats are worthy of this car, at it's level of performance, at this price. YMMV
The Defenders talk about performance for the dollar when they excuse or minimize the C6 complaints. This is one area they can not excuse.
These must be the poorest designed seats in any car that purports to be a sportscar, at any price. I have the "Sports Seats" but they have minimal support, minimal adjustment, no lumbar adjust, no thigh bolster adjustment. The seat bottoms are simply too short for me to feel comfortable or supported. I had better seats in my '69 vette. The C6 is such a amazing performance car, and such a performance improvement over my '69 that the seats used are unexplainable.
The best seats I have experienced were in my 330i ZHP package. Good side and lateral support, a good range of adjustment, more leg room that the vette. My favorite, thigh bolsters that extended to several positions. Adjusting the seat bottom does not affect the seat back position... This in an admittedly overpriced BMW, but it was more than $10,000 cheaper than my C6. The seats in my son's WRX are better that the vette.
I won't complain about the materials used in the interior, they do not affect performance to any real degree. I love the dash and the DIC. I love the factory NAV.
Just don't tell me that the seats are worthy of this car, at it's level of performance, at this price. YMMV
Hmmmm...I love my seats. I think the adjustment range is decent (considering the room available), and the lumbar support/side bolsters/head support are all quite nice. I suppose they could have made it 8-way power adjustable, but the same end is met via the back angle lever. I do wish that the wheel tilt was also electric and part of the memory package.


By the way, I enjoy this show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCr1RXfKyVA
Now, to give some perspective, I will also throw in that the C6 seat is realistically 5 to 10 TIMES better than the total piece of JUNK SEAT provided in the Lambo Diablo I had that originally sold for almost $300k!!! That's a fact. One piece seat. All it did was "rock" back and forth by turning a ****, and if you didn't have it turned all the way in either direction, the mechanism has "give" in it and it wiggled everytime you moved. Total trash. I NEVER got comfortable.
Not to say all high priced cars have crappy seats because they don't, I'm just illustrating that no matter what the price point, the engineers still have to balance the books and the weight. Cars in general are an object lesson in compromise.
) Frankly, with good quality manual adjusters (which the C6 does not have) power seat adjustments are irrelevant. Fully manual Recaros, for example, as used in $25K VWs, are superior to what's in any C6, IMO. So are the seat materials. I don't think GM is spending any less, or that weight is a big consideration. On the other hand, I think there's more to it than you think there is. I'm not sure why the seats are so terrible, but if I had to venture a wild guess it's that there are limitations on what the supplier (Lear?) is willing to build for a certain price, perhaps based on some designs or whatever they already have in production, or that there might be intellectual property issues for better designs; whatever. GM might not, for the C6's seat production budget, be able to get a better design from another supplier because they don't drive enough volume with the right vendor. These are all wild guesses, but issues I've personally seen happen in other production programs.For some of the interior materials, like the hard shiny plastics, you would think GM could choose some alternatives that would cost only pennies more per unit, but it may not be so simple. Sometimes those "soft-touch" materials have production or warranty side-effects that we're not aware of. (For example, that you have to package them with more labor and materials, or assembling them takes more time. In volume manufacturing it's always something...)
I'm suspecting that GM engineers know every weakness of their design better than we do. I'll bet there are some compromises they're not happy with either. I'll bet sometimes we win as customers for reasons we'd rather not know about.
(For example, perhaps those electronic door mechanisms save cost and weight...)I'm in the camp that does a lot of bitching about the C6 seats, but I'm under no preconceptions that the "fix" is for GM to spend another $100/unit. I'd think it's a lot more complex than that.
Last edited by Irv; Feb 12, 2007 at 07:20 PM.




















