When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Okay, I guess we might as well beat this up some more (despite what I said in another thread). Too hot to go to the dragstrip anyway.
Here is a new twist on the debate as to how potent the new LS3 is. The data below is all from Car & Driver magazine tests. I decided to stick with one magazine for the best potential consistency. They actually tested three LS2s, but one was a convertible (I do have that data). The second LS2 test below was a comparison test with a Porsche.
Unfortunately, in some tests they list data at every 10mph increment, and some they don't.
Last edited by jschindler; Aug 16, 2007 at 08:58 PM.
I doubt it The 2008 stock to stock would pull on the stock c5z 02-04's.
From a roll, I'd almost guarantee it.
The chart is interesting, but lets put some things into perspective. First of all, look at the fact that two virutally identical LS2's were tested by the same magazine and came up with pretty significant differences in performance.
Second, how many of you buy that the 405 hp Z06 was so much faster than the 385 version? Look at the difference to the higher speeds. Those are huge differences.
The chart is interesting, but lets put some things into perspective. First of all, look at the fact that two virutally identical LS2's were tested by the same magazine and came up with pretty significant differences in performance.
Second, how many of you buy that the 405 hp Z06 was so much faster than the 385 version? Look at the difference to the higher speeds. Those are huge differences.
Great point. I find it odd that with 20 exta hp the 405 hp z takes four secs less to get to 150 mph than the 385 hp z. How does this add up?
Unless those were all tested with the same driver, on the same track and most importantly, the same day, which they weren't, the times don't mean a hill of beans.
Unless those were all tested with the same driver, on the same track and most importantly, the same day, which they weren't, the times don't mean a hill of beans.
But thanks for compiling the times
And that may be a pertinent point. Maybe all the times posted on the forum don't mean a hill of beans. But that damn sure doesn't stop us from micro-analyzing them. I figure that tests done by a magazine, where they at least do have consistent procedures, and the drivers are - by the very definition - professionals who do it for a living, should have more meaning than damn near any results we read on a forum posted by people who in most cases we don't even know what their real name is
I figure that tests done by a magazine, where they at least do have consistent procedures, and the drivers are - by the very definition - professionals who do it for a living, should have more meaning than damn near any results we read on a forum posted by people who in most cases we don't even know what their real name is
Excellent point; and by extension, wouldn't that mean that Chevrolet's published times have even more meaning considering the multiple tests they conduct using their own professional drivers on the same track with all results corrected to standard day conditions and then averaged to come up with what is presented to us?
Last edited by Marina Blue; Aug 16, 2007 at 11:13 PM.
And that may be a pertinent point. Maybe all the times posted on the forum don't mean a hill of beans. But that damn sure doesn't stop us from micro-analyzing them. I figure that tests done by a magazine, where they at least do have consistent procedures, and the drivers are - by the very definition - professionals who do it for a living, should have more meaning than damn near any results we read on a forum posted by people who in most cases we don't even know what their real name is
You may be right but be careful, if we're going to start questioning/doubting the validity/global accuracy of 'forum member track times' then we have to question ALL of the posted results, the new LS3 times included.
Excellent point; and by extension, wouldn't that mean that Chevrolet's published times have even more meaning considering the multiple tests they conduct using their own professional drivers on the same track with all results corrected to standard day conditions and then averaged to come up with what is presented to us?
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.