When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The only good reason for big diameter wheels is big brakes. So why bigger on the rear than front when the front brakes do most of the work and are bigger? If quicker steering response was the reason the bigger diameter wheels would be on the front, not the rear.
They do it because they think it looks good.
I ran 17's all the way around on my C5, I'll probably go 18's front and rear on my C6.
If you want quicker steering response, add more air to the front tires.
The only good reason for big diameter wheels is big brakes. So why bigger on the rear than front when the front brakes do most of the work and are bigger? If quicker steering response was the reason the bigger diameter wheels would be on the front, not the rear.
They do it because they think it looks good.
I ran 17's all the way around on my C5, I'll probably go 18's front and rear on my C6.
If you want quicker steering response, add more air to the front tires.
I think this was mentioned in the book "All Corvettes Are Red." I think it has to do with creating the correct stagger for aerodynamics.
I would recommend all C5 and C6 people read that book.
18" in the front for the brakes, 19" in the rear for that modern styling. I think though, the "Big Wheel" look is just that, the stylists are going back to their "Big Wheel" childhood Anyway, to my eye 18" is about the biggest wheel I would go with in a street application; for racing I wouldn't look for anything bigger then a 17" wheel-it just takes too much enegry to spin big hoops up to speed
Not sure of the physics but isn't there an advantage to having less rotational inertia: larger wheels rotate slower at speed?
Mike
Yup, it takes more energy to spin up and stay at that speed. I guess Moment of Interia and Angular Momentum are the physic's involved, but I fell asleep alot during physic's so I am probably dead wrong.
Yup, it takes more energy to spin up and stay at that speed. I guess Moment of Interia and Angular Momentum are the physic's involved, but I fell asleep alot during physic's so I am probably dead wrong.
While you're right in that less rotational weight is good larger wheels have more, not less. The weight is further from the hub therby taking more energy to spin.
As for stagger, you get that with the diameter of the tires, not the wheels.
the front and rear have the exact same sidewall height. If you go with 18's all the way around you have to run a tire with a taller sidewall in the rear to meet the front to rear bias on diameter. It would look goofy IMO.
My rear rotors fill up the 19" wheel......of course I went with the baer 2 pc. oversized rotor (14") The stock rear rotor looks like something off of a camry Baer fixed that problem for me
the front and rear have the exact same sidewall height. If you go with 18's all the way around you have to run a tire with a taller sidewall in the rear to meet the front to rear bias on diameter. It would look goofy IMO.
To each his own. I've never been a fan of the big wheel, small sidewall look.
Besides, we're only talking about an increase in sidewall height of half an inch. I doubt most folks would even notice it unless it was pointed out to them.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.