HELP - Transmission shifting problem
Anyone else experience this?
Anyone have a clue as to what's happening?
A few words about the videos:
1 – These were taken with a Sony HandiCam
2 – They were “video captured” with a Pinnacle video conversion device
3 – “Shift Start” in the video is the “time stamp” of the video when the RPM pointer climbs through acceleration and then starts to fall (starting the shift)
4 – “Shift End” in the video is the “time stamp” of the video when the pointer starts to climb after the shift is complete
5 – There are 5 videos in total. They are respectively:
In “D” - shift time 0.70 seconds
In “S” and not using the paddles (not in COMP mode) - shift time 0.51 seconds
In “S” and using the paddles (not in COMP mode) - shift time 1.20 seconds!!!
In “S” and COMP mode and not using the paddles - shift time 0.44 seconds
In “S” and COMP mode and using the paddles - shift time 0.54 seconds
6 – The measured times here are very accurate (within 1 frame of video which is ~ 0.03 seconds).
Here are the videos...


1. Does it make these slow shifts only at WOT? What about 80% throttle?
2. I assume you have done this multiple times and there is no chance you are hitting the rev limiter on the nannies engaged paddle shifts?
3. I can almost guarantee that the computer nannies have something to do with this. I wonder if you are on the cusp of breaking traction and it is making the computer a little hesitant to shift because it's on the brink of engaging traction control. If I remember correctly the A6 WILL NOT shift while in paddle mode and traction control is engaged. I noticed traction control kicking in in the video and what may be happening is that the computer may not have time to reset before you command the 1-2 shift. I know that sounds ridiculous, but there is really no other explanation. If it was a mechanical problem it wouldn't matter what mode you were in, you would still have the "slipping" effect of the shift that you are getting. So it has to be a software computer issue.
4. Have you tried different street surfaces? Try it on another surface(which provides the best traction) and see if you still have the issue.
Edit: I'm gonna go try mine right now and see what happens.
Edit2: Nevermind, it's raining and the roads are all wet.
Last edited by Silverspeed; Jul 18, 2009 at 10:54 PM.
1. Does it make these slow shifts only at WOT? What about 80% throttle?
2. I assume you have done this multiple times and there is no chance you are hitting the rev limiter on the nannies engaged paddle shifts?
3. I can almost guarantee that the computer nannies have something to do with this. I wonder if you are on the cusp of breaking traction and it is making the computer a little hesitant to shift because it's on the brink of engaging traction control. If I remember correctly the A6 WILL NOT shift while in paddle mode and traction control is engaged. I noticed traction control kicking in in the video and what may be happening is that the computer may not have time to reset before you command the 1-2 shift. I know that sounds ridiculous, but there is really no other explanation. If it was a mechanical problem it wouldn't matter what mode you were in, you would still have the "slipping" effect of the shift that you are getting. So it has to be a software computer issue.
4. Have you tried different street surfaces? Try it on another surface(which provides the best traction) and see if you still have the issue.
Edit: I'm gonna go try mine right now and see what happens.
Edit2: Nevermind, it's raining and the roads are all wet.

A few things to add.
1 - I can repeat this issue at-will.
2 - It only happens in the one mode.
3 - I've experienced this issue on several different road surfaces.
4 - I have also experienced this when hitting the "+" button at a little lower RPM.


If it doesn't do it then, try rolling into the start then applying 100% throttle (so traction control won't engage) and see if you have the same problem.
Last edited by Silverspeed; Jul 18, 2009 at 11:13 PM.
I will try both the rolling start and 80-90% throttle tests tomorrow. Very good suggestions and I appreciate the input!
I also notice the A6 shifts faster on its own compared to using the paddles.
But I am ashamed to say I have never used the paddles in COMP mode. Gotta give that a try... good enough reason to go for a drive today!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Using SilverSpeed's input, I ran more tests today after it finished raining and the roads dried up (just detailed the Vette Saturday after my last tests).
Here's the dealio....
Same basic set of initial conditions. Did not pack the HandiCam this time as I know I can tell the difference between a 0.50 second shift and a 1.20 second shift.
Test 1 - Roll out from 0 MPH with a throttle setting of about 80% (enought to have an aggressive launch without squealing the tires and without the TC kicking in). Shift at about 6000RPM. Shift was absolutely clean and sharp.
Test 2 - Roll out and ease into the throttle (still quickly however as the car does like to accelerate
) and step into WOT so that I'm at WOT well before the shift and without squealing the tires and without TC kicking in). Shift at about 6000RPM. Shift was absolutely clean and sharp.Test 3 - Perform test 2 but this time not shifting until 6500RPM. WHAM. ****-poor shift! The culprit is the rev limiter nanny! The nanny kicks in really quick but doesn't release for a while! The rev limiter is what is causing the long shift times!
So, my major concern is not valid. The real concern I have now is the delay between when you hit the "+" button and when the trans actually shifts! The delay absolutely sucks!!!
Mystery solved. Thanks for the input!!!
Last edited by inthehunt2; Jul 19, 2009 at 10:07 PM.


Using SilverSpeed's input, I ran mode tests today after it finished raining and the roads dried up (just detailed the Vette Friday after my last tests).
Here's the dealio....
Same basic set of initial conditions. Did not pack the HanidCam this time as I know I can tell the difference between a 0.50 second shift and a 1.20 second shift.
Test 1 - Roll out from 0 MPH with a throttle setting of about 80% (enought to have an aggressive launch without squealing the tires and without the TC kicking in). Shift at about 6000RPM. Shift was absolutely clean and sharp.
Test 2 - Roll out and ease into the throttle (still quickly however as the car does like to accelerate
) and step into WOT so that I'm at WOT well before the shift and without squealing the tires and without TC kicking in). Shift at about 6000RPM. Shift was absolutely clean and sharp.Test 3 - Perform test 2 but this time not shifting until 6500RPM. WHAM. ****-poor shift! The culprint is the rev limiter nanny! The nanny kicks in really quick but doesn't release for a while! The rev limiter is what is causing the long shift times!
So, my major concern is not valid. The real concern I have now is the delay between when you hit the "+" button and when the trans actually shifts! The delay absolute sucks!!!
Mystery solved. Thanks for the input!!!
In the initial test in Comp Mode at what RPM were you hitting the paddles? Do you think you might have been hitting the paddles a little quicker in Comp Mode and not hitting the rev limiter?
Still not completely sure that traction control kicking in didn't have something to do with the slow shift in the initial test. In the second test you purposely avoided kicking it in so it's hard to tell if that had something to do with it or not.
Anyway, glad you figured out the mystery.
Still not completely sure that traction control kicking in didn't have something to do with the slow shift in the initial test. In the second test you purposely avoided kicking it in so it's hard to tell if that had something to do with it or not.
Anyway, glad you figured out the mystery.

TC could add another element to the equation I am sure. I just didn't test that as when I was out I thought to myself, "I wonder if I'm tagging the rev limiter?". When I did that test, bingo! The same crap shift time happened and the same "tranny slip" feeling occurred. But, it wasn't tranny slip, it was the rev limiter nanny. That's when I ended the test.
Hat's off to your suggestions. They pointed me in the right direction to be able to hit and control the problem. Controlling the problem is a majority of the battle. After you can control it, you get more confidfence you're on the right track.
Thanks Bro!
Last edited by inthehunt2; Jul 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM.


TC could add another element to the equation I am sure. I just didn't test that as when I was out I thought to myself, "I wonder if I'm tagging the rev limiter?". When I did that test, bingo! The same crap shift time happened and the same "tranny slip" feeling occurred. But, it wasn't tranny slip, it was the rev limiter nanny. That's when I ended the test.
Hat's off to your suggestions. They pointed me in the right direction to be able to hit and control the problem. Controlling the problem is a majority of the battle. After you can control it, you get more confidfence you're on the right track.
Thanks Bro!

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-c...post1570891086






I just didn't want to quantify this aspect. Instead, I wanted to keep the test simple and do it in a way that others could test and try to reproduce things and maybe even compare data. Measuring time from pointer starting to drop to pointer starting to climb seemed a "good enough" measureable. Since there is filtering in the instrument cluster software which filters the movement of the TACH pointer, I figured that the filtering would have the same basic effect with the pointer moving in both directions (or close enough) so I eliminated this variable from the study for simplicity's sake and made the assumption that the TACH filtering was the same for both "pointer up" and "pointer down".





