When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Just another example of the intentional reporting of mis-information on the part of the news media to sway the populace into supporting some sort of political agenda based upon simple BS rather then true facts and data.
God bless the engineers and those of us able to reason for ourselves!
Regards,
GSRANDY
Welcome to the world of smoke and mirrors. Open your eyes folks, and read between the lines of our deceptive media!
They took it out of the article. I hate bad journalism. It seems to be rather prevalent these days. Just look at a few articles on CNN on any given day and you'll find it.
And they should add the ZR1 to the list of the rarely driven cars that have very low production.
Leaving all politics outside, the larger issue here is a news organization that's stating false fasts therefore making false claims. Obviously they didn't do their homework or there was some deliberate trashing going on of our cars. We are the owners and we know the real facts. It was very interesting that Forbes suddenly got the firestorm of emails, comments and who knows what else then suddenly removed "Corvette" from the list of bad cars. They should have come here for their facts as we "know"!
i don't know. i've not got better than 14.3 around town on my A6 - ever. never have done highway. my CTS gets 18-20 around town and can get 24-26 highway. those are my REALISTIC numbers. my Avalanche gets 14-16 in town, 18-21 highway.
Last edited by jimmie jam; Dec 1, 2010 at 08:14 AM.
They had a similar article on Yahoo the other day ( Forbes was the source ), didn't mention the Vette, but the CTS-V, not the regular CTS . Same thing with the Audi A5, and few more, I wanted to smack someone after reading that trash. Lets compare a Hybrid with a HP car and see who wins....Trash, pure Trash. Useless biased information, and the lemmings buy into it!
They had a similar article on Yahoo the other day ( Forbes was the source ), didn't mention the Vette, but the CTS-V, not the regular CTS . Same thing with the Audi A5, and few more, I wanted to smack someone after reading that trash. Lets compare a Hybrid with a HP car and see who wins....Trash, pure Trash. Useless biased information, and the lemmings buy into it!
I suspect it was the same article with corrections made. If you go back to the original Forbes article, it has changed also. Unfortunately, the print version probably went out as the original.
I also suspect that one of the reasons we see DIDN'T see some cars on the list is driven by advertising revenue.
It appears that they chose the model/option that gave them the most dramatic numbers. For the Corvette they gave the numbers for the ZR1, and for the CTS they gave the numbers for the CTS-V. Amusingly the text of their article states
So why exempt the AMG model Mercedes, the BMW "M" series and "exotics", but hammer Audi's "S" model, Cadillac's "V" model and Chevy's "ZR1" model, which are also low production, high performance models?
Because tree-huggers wouldn't go for dragging Audi and AMG through the mud.