Duh back at you. Lutz wasn't even with GM when the Aztek was designed. Mr. Peters (as A35th has so kindly stated) was the guy in charge of that monstrosity. Hopefully Lutz will keep him in check this time around.

Do some research before firing back with a retort.

 

- I'm with ya - MassVette - :chevy could have at least chosen LeMans blue for the paint scheme !!! :jester :jester :jester

Back in the Sixties GM had special 'gimmicks' like fiber optics, turbo-jet, astro-ventilation, 3-diff. hood styles, 12+ engine combos, what the h*ll happened ? :mad ....guess you're right about #2 and if they keep it up we'll see GM at #3 ! :cuss :mad :cuss :mad :cuss :mad .....such a let down for :flag

 

If that is true that I stand corrected, the reason I thought Lutz was guilty for the axtek was I read it on posts in this forum. I should have known better not to everything I read. Anyhow I'll take your word for it. Now look at it from my point of view, I read somewhere on ths forum that Lutz was in charge of the Aztek. Then I see all these posts stating not to worry Lutz is in charge. I ask in other threads why people were so secure that the C6 would be ok with Lutz after he did the Aztek. After not hearing anything to rebut it I continued to believe Lutz did the Aztek. Thank you for correcting me. Now my next question is , what has he done in the past to make you so sure he will come through

 

The Viper, the Prowler, Dodge Ram, and the PT Cruiser. And, according to auto.com, he "Reinvigorated Chrysler's product line to help steer it away from bankruptcy in early 1990s."

 

thank you for the info

 

That did kind of riun it for some I guess..