When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've been noticing a lot of competing car companies have been adding front and rear strut tower braces as standard suspension components. The 370Z is one example. Seems like a fairly easy and cheap way to decrease body flex. Anyone know why the Corvette engineers have not adopted this to their design?
Would be interested to know if there was a reason.
Just a wild guess, but doesn't the Vette have a real frame, while the others are a uni-body? The uni-body cars may flex more under stress. Just a guess though.
Macpherson Struts (and their towers) are an evil plan cooked up by wayward youth to allow for from-the-bottom installation of the power train, or just the engine, of a (usually, but not always) uni-body car.
Since Corvettes are constructed differently (engine mounted in actual rock-solid frame, body mounted on frame...see marriage ceremony), there is no need for struts, or the ugly bolt on strengthening bracket.
Not to worry! Our suspension rocks!
Little known fact for JeremyTopGearCantFindABed: Porsche even has a patent (#6029987) on a "strut suspension system supported by a transverse leaf spring system" very much the same as that used by the Corvette. Hummm
I've been noticing a lot of competing car companies have been adding front and rear strut tower braces as standard suspension components. The 370Z is one example. Seems like a fairly easy and cheap way to decrease body flex. Anyone know why the Corvette engineers have not adopted this to their design?
Would be interested to know if there was a reason.
something ..... about......... questions ...???
Originally Posted by EDinPA
You should definitely add some strut braces, right after you add some struts.
I've been noticing a lot of competing car companies have been adding front and rear strut tower braces as standard suspension components. The 370Z is one example. Seems like a fairly easy and cheap way to decrease body flex. Anyone know why the Corvette engineers have not adopted this to their design?
Would be interested to know if there was a reason.
The C6 frame is very stiff. It would take a lot to distort the shock mounts - there are images somewhere on this site where the factory shocks have broken before doing anything to the mounts...On a unibody youre constantly distorting and flexing it - there is constant push/pull on all those tack welds so tieing it together correctly can help slow down the distortion. This is one of the reasons for "seam welding" or adding extra tack welds to a unibody car.
Last edited by el es tu; Nov 29, 2012 at 08:59 AM.
^^ Also why F-body owners add subframe connectors. Much more important mod than a strut tower brace.
My '94 Z28 race car has subframe connectors and a roll cage. If you lift the car with a jack anywhere, the entire car raises and lowers perfectly in synch - 100% rigid.
If you jack up a stock F-body...
While it's called a strut tower brace, cars with coil overs and double wishbone suspension can benefit from them. The Miata has them, even if it has full spring, shock and wish bone suspension.
They benefit unibody consturctions.
Strut tower braces are mostly seen on cars not designed for performance, ie Mustangs, Cameros designed to a mass market low MSRP to get the price shopper and V6 buyers. A much larger portion of total sales than the hipo models. Corvette were designed from the ground up asa performance cars and the structural rigidity was designed in from the begining.
Even if you wanted to add a strut tower brace, there's not facility to add one on the corvette. It's a short long arm designed system. It doesn't have struts.
That's not to say that there aren't some ways of adding rigidity to the chassis itself.
Anyway, a lot of strut tower braces don't really do a whole lot to begin with. Especially in modern cars, even if they do have a strut and lower arm style suspension.
Just a wild guess, but doesn't the Vette have a real frame, while the others are a uni-body? The uni-body cars may flex more under stress. Just a guess though.