Factory Nav differences?
Thread Starter
Premium Supporting Vendor
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,852
Likes: 123
From: www.EXOTICVETTE.com - FL Cruise-In VI, VII, & VIII
Cruise-In V Veteran
St. Jude's Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Factory Nav differences?
Is there any difference at all in the factory Nav radio from 2006 to 2012? (HD Radio, better circuitry, reception, etc) If so, what year did it change or was it software that's updated from the Nav disc?
Race Director
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 11,338
Likes: 2,438
From: Eastern
There was issues in 2008-09 with the screen going blank, but there was a program flash update that cured it. I think the only difference over the years is updated DVD's that may of added newer roadways and more Points of Interests. The operation has not changed from year to year. The C7 looks like a new design, much like the current aftermarket NAV systems.
Team Owner
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,617
Likes: 167
Tech Contributor
Cruise-In 11 Veteran
NCM Ambassador
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'10
2008 navigation radios got a +3 decibel boost.
2010 added a USB port and an Auxiliary jack for music playback.
No changes to the hardware or interface.
2010 added a USB port and an Auxiliary jack for music playback.
No changes to the hardware or interface.
Race Director
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 1,193
From: La Center WA
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
Team Owner
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,617
Likes: 167
Tech Contributor
Cruise-In 11 Veteran
NCM Ambassador
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'10
Race Director
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 11,338
Likes: 2,438
From: Eastern
Thread Starter
Premium Supporting Vendor
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,852
Likes: 123
From: www.EXOTICVETTE.com - FL Cruise-In VI, VII, & VIII
Cruise-In V Veteran
St. Jude's Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Le Mans Master
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,514
Likes: 235
From: Currently somewhere in IL,IN,KY,TN,MO,AR,MS,AL, or FL
The reason they are so expensive is someone has to pay the development cost of the updates and there is very little demand since most people don't need to know about the new McDonalds that opened up in Bumtussle AK. Low volume means high cost. Garmin and such have a different marketing strategy. They now include free updates and roll the cost into the hardware they continue to sell. But 15 years ago when volume was much lower they were also charging $200 for an update. If GM could sell 125 million new nav units every year they could also afford to give away free updates.
Melting Slicks
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 40
From: Edmonton Alberta
The reason they are so expensive is someone has to pay the development cost of the updates and there is very little demand since most people don't need to know about the new McDonalds that opened up in Bumtussle AK. Low volume means high cost. Garmin and such have a different marketing strategy. They now include free updates and roll the cost into the hardware they continue to sell. But 15 years ago when volume was much lower they were also charging $200 for an update. If GM could sell 125 million new nav units every year they could also afford to give away free updates.
But they can't and there are better alternatives for the consumer.
Thread Starter
Premium Supporting Vendor
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,852
Likes: 123
From: www.EXOTICVETTE.com - FL Cruise-In VI, VII, & VIII
Cruise-In V Veteran
St. Jude's Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
Best part, for me, about factory nav is integration into HUD. With a quality digital audio convertor you can run a hi-fi system as good as any aftermarket head unit. I will be going to the new Kenwood next month that is, by far, the best double-din to come to market ever (so far). I was going to use my Pioneer 8400 in the mean time but I really like the HUD intergration. Showing directions on nav and station info. Steering wheel controls are nice but can be workable with the right aftermarket unit and adapters.
Race Director
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 19,574
Likes: 167
From: Frederick, MD
All NAVs have their pros and cons. I had a portable Garmin and a Kenwood in my 08. Currently have the OEM in my 11 GS Vert.
The main argument against the OEM NAV is that it is not traffic capable if that is what you desire. Portable Garmin's traffic was free, Kenwood's was free but with ads flashing every few min. To be honest traffic features tend to be wrong a lot as google maps on a cell is more accurate.
Paul has done a tremendous job making the NAV easy to use.
Regardless of what NAV I have I would still bring updated maps with you and look at them before. Every single NAV I mentioned above was wrong more than once. The Kenwood thought the quickest way from Salt Lake City to Albuquerque was via Cheyenne/Denver was the worst though when it is actually a 550 mile trip thru the 4 corners. I did not have interstates only or whatever selected. I actually programmed in a way point near the 4 corners and it worked fine then.
GM could copy Chrysler's UConnect technology and be so much better as my wife's system in her 300C puts them all to shame as well does the Alpine sound system.
The main argument against the OEM NAV is that it is not traffic capable if that is what you desire. Portable Garmin's traffic was free, Kenwood's was free but with ads flashing every few min. To be honest traffic features tend to be wrong a lot as google maps on a cell is more accurate.
Paul has done a tremendous job making the NAV easy to use.
Regardless of what NAV I have I would still bring updated maps with you and look at them before. Every single NAV I mentioned above was wrong more than once. The Kenwood thought the quickest way from Salt Lake City to Albuquerque was via Cheyenne/Denver was the worst though when it is actually a 550 mile trip thru the 4 corners. I did not have interstates only or whatever selected. I actually programmed in a way point near the 4 corners and it worked fine then.
GM could copy Chrysler's UConnect technology and be so much better as my wife's system in her 300C puts them all to shame as well does the Alpine sound system.
Race Director
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,555
Likes: 1,255
From: Saint Albans, WV
The main argument against the OEM NAV is that it is not traffic capable if that is what you desire. Portable Garmin's traffic was free, Kenwood's was free but with ads flashing every few min. To be honest traffic features tend to be wrong a lot as google maps on a cell is more accurate.
GM could copy Chrysler's UConnect technology and be so much better as my wife's system in her 300C puts them all to shame as well does the Alpine sound system.
GM could copy Chrysler's UConnect technology and be so much better as my wife's system in her 300C puts them all to shame as well does the Alpine sound system.
Race Director
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 19,574
Likes: 167
From: Frederick, MD
I heard Caddy's new CUE isn't getting that great reviews, at least what is available in the ATS. I also read you won't see many HDD systems in the future because of piracy concerns such as borrowing a CD or another IPOD, transferring the songs to the HDD system.
Intermediate
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Are the USB port and Aux jack built into the unit or are they separate, installed in the dash? Also, did they ever offer HD radio?