JUst a quick question
Gasoline has 32.6 units of energy.
My ball point calcultor says the gasohol will be down 3.6% on energy compared to the pure gas.
Assume the 3.6% carries over to mileage and power;
26MPG becomes 25.06 MPG
Power becomes LS2=385.6HP and LS3 436 becomes 420.3HP
1 MPG isn't much but 14 to 16 HP is a big difference.
Gasoline has 32.6 units of energy.
My ball point calcultor says the gasohol will be down 3.6% on energy compared to the pure gas.
Assume the 3.6% carries over to mileage and power;
26MPG becomes 25.06 MPG
Power becomes LS2=385.6HP and LS3 436 becomes 420.3HP
1 MPG isn't much but 14 to 16 HP is a big difference.
As far as the OP’s question, there are arguments on both sides, but none of them are compelling. It will just boil down to which issues strike your fancy the most. On the side of the 93 with ethanol, the higher octane would help Z06, ZR1, and modded engines, but not make much difference to others. Also a possible benefit to the 93, depending on which brand you choose, you can probably find top tier, while the 91 Sunoco is not. Don’t know what the price will be, but due to mileage loss with ethanol, the 91 ethanol-free can be up to 5% more expensive to be a breakeven for you economically. Some people rant and rave about the dangers and drawbacks of ethanol, but those are all very low probability risks. Those who shout the loudest about the risks are pretty much universally, the ultra strong political opponents of ethanol. And of course that brings us to the last difference, politics. Some feel very strongly about the politics of ethanol, with ethanol having both its strong supporters and strong opponents.
If it were me, I’d see the politics as a wash. Both sides have good points, but both sides are also guilty of exaggerations. I see top tier as valuable insurance against deposits, and my car is also one of the ones where the engine can make use of the added 2 octane. So I’d get the 93 with ethanol from a top tier brand.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The O2 sensor doesn't read energy of the fuel, it just adjusts the AMOUNT of air vs the AMOUNT of fuel by weight.
Alcohol has less energy per volume than gas so there will be less energy derived from an equal volume alcohol. Same volume of air, same volume of fuel BUT less energy (Horsepower).
Alcohol has less energy per volume than gas so there will be less energy derived from an equal volume alcohol. Same volume of air, same volume of fuel BUT less energy (Horsepower).
Since your foot controls the amount of power (fuel delivery) to the wheels and the sensors just keep the engine running right, the entire horsepower argument is moot. Mileage will be slightly less for sure though.
Gasoline has 32.6 units of energy.
My ball point calcultor says the gasohol will be down 3.6% on energy compared to the pure gas.
Assume the 3.6% carries over to mileage and power;
26MPG becomes 25.06 MPG
Power becomes LS2=385.6HP and LS3 436 becomes 420.3HP
1 MPG isn't much but 14 to 16 HP is a big difference.




The same refinery supplies every gas station where I live. Sorry, I don't believe they really make "top tier" and lower grades at the same refinery with the same equipment stored in the same tanks delivered in the same trucks.
The same refinery supplies every gas station where I live. Sorry, I don't believe they really make "top tier" and lower grades at the same refinery with the same equipment stored in the same tanks delivered in the same trucks.






The same refinery supplies every gas station where I live. Sorry, I don't believe they really make "top tier" and lower grades at the same refinery with the same equipment stored in the same tanks delivered in the same trucks.
He knows more than most people, including you and I.
If you search under his user name, he has commented several times in other threads about the top tier certification process, and what the advantages are to your car.
He, and many others, have commented about the "same refinery same equipment same tanks" fallacy.
















