When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
With just 12,000 miles on my 2011 Coupe (base) I found myself in need of new front tires (the rear both have 6/32 of tread remaining). Whilst watching the technician mount my replacements he made an interesting discovery with regard to the pax side tire. "Sir, did you know that this tire was mounted backwards? The directional arrow should be pointing to the right."
Wow. So I inspect the tire once off to see if there was any patch (noting I bought the car at 6900 miles), and the original owner had advised that there was never any work done to the car, thinking maybe it was once off for a repair. No patch...
My only conclusion (given the driver's side was mounted correctly) is the car must have come this was from the factory.
Has to do with the location of the rain grooves I believe. In reality it probably doesn't make much difference at all. The Michelin PSS's only have an inside and outside ... non-directional.
I don't believe any of the C6 corvette models came from the factory with directional tires, however some / most? of the tires had an inside and outside requirement. Is it possible that a tire was incorrectly mounted with the inside on the outside? I suppose. I recall hearing/reading that the tires were mounted by Goodyear/Michelin and then shipped to the assembly plant @ BG, but don't know that for sure.
I don't believe any of the C6 corvette models came from the factory with directional tires, however some / most? of the tires had an inside and outside requirement. Is it possible that a tire was incorrectly mounted with the inside on the outside? I suppose. I recall hearing/reading that the tires were mounted by Goodyear/Michelin and then shipped to the assembly plant @ BG, but don't know that for sure.
The tires were the original Goodyear Eagle that came with the car. And on the side was a designated "rotational" arrow. And the PAX tire was mounted with the arrow going backwards...
As to the Tirerack blog, I found that quite interesting and consistent with what others have told me. But with that said, I remain amazed that GM let this go by. Not much quality control.
Notably, and with respect to an earlier post, BOTH tires were equally worn and evenly across the tread.
I suspect your mileage was due to alignment and not the tire mounting. While 12k may seem low to you, OEM tire mileage has been the subject of many posts, rants and questions. I got around 14K on mine even with a proper alignment every 6 months.
I believe that is a very rare, well at least it was, factory experimental car. Saw one on Barrett Jackson go for $1.5 million.
Oh well. At least your tires are headed in the right direction now.
I still have the original Goodyears on factory rims, I am going to take a look at them tomorrow.
Seems like 12,000 or so is the norm for the fronts, at least if my anecdotal survey is to be believed. My rear tires (checked, and indeed mounted directionally correct) have 6/32 left, so should last another 8000-10,000.
Just to be on the safe side I am going to get the car aligned. It will be interesting to see if any significant adjustments are needed.
As to "rare, experimental car", well, having sold more cars than I can count that today would be selling for a small fortune I will accept this as just another of many lost opportunities... Just like my chance to play on the PGA Tour....
I think blaming the factory is a stretch. You bought the car used with 6900 miles and the previous owner advised he did nothing to the car.
I've got a bridge for sale, interested? :-)
The previous owner was a "she," and the car was her second (gift on her fiftieth from her husband). As a result, very, very low mileage (I bought it with 6500 miles or so in 2014). She had no reason to not tell me if they had any issues as the car had been traded in to a dealer where I found it, and I reached out to her only as part of my due diligence before closing the sale with the dealer. Put another way, what possible motive would she have for not disclosing this, let alone anything else that might have been an issue with the car (noting she advise that the car had been perfect).
So, given this clearly was the original tire, and the original and only other owner had no reason to "hide" any prior need to pull it off the rim, what logical explanation do you have as to why it was mounted backwards other than it came that was from GM?
LOVE LOVE this car Steve...just looks awesome! And it's history and usage puts it at the top IMO.
Keep the stories, trips and photos coming! I enjoy each one!
Perk
Maybe at the GM plant it was stored on the left side of the building with all of the left side wheels and tires. So as a joke on a Friday or Monday someone moved it over to the right side of the building to see how long it would be before someone noticed. Took a few years.
Just to throw this out there:
I bought a used ZR1 with low mileage from a high end used car dealer that kept it indoors.
When he sold the car to me he said he replaced one rear tire due to a small screw in it. It could of been installed backwards (it wasn't).
If he didn't tell me that I would of guessed like one of the above post mentioned, it was from the factory.
Maybe the dealership notice a problem with the OP's front tire upon delivery & replaced it backwards (not knowing) & not worth mentioning the tire change to the original owner????
Just a thought.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.