When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Drove a 6spd auto today, I could do either, however the encounter withthe Vert on Tuesday left me puzzled, I thought the C6 had more leg/foot room yet my Clutch foot kept getting caught on something ont he lower hush of the dash.. I have plenty of room in my C4
Did you have boots or large shoes on? Maybe the seat was not or does not go back as far as a coupe? maybe your foot was reaching for a pedal that wasn't there. I have a manual and have never had any issues with my left foot hitting under the dash.
I also love the C4 and would love to add one but I already have a quirky 91 TPI F-body that I just can't part with. I remember when the C4 came out and thought it was the best gen to date. All the tech advances and the race inspired chassis, I still love them.
I have a manual vert and have plenty of room. I did try and drive it once with boots and the top of the boot would hang up on the lower dash panel. I did not even get out of the driveway and had to change shoes. Same thing with flip flops except they hang up on the floor mat. Conclusion is wear tennis shoes.
Well I wasn't wearing boots just shoes.. top of shoe would catch on the hush panel. That didn't happen in the past in a c5. I doesn't help that I wear size 14
looking at another C6 manual today, seen if it truly was an issue with the vert I drove as that vert had several issues anyway. Very possibly the hush panel was not reinstalled correctly.
My son wears a size 14 and is 6’5 and he has no trouble driving mine. Maybe it was just that car.
That is my thought
45k mile car that looked like it lived a rough life. The front tires were from 2011. Price was lower than others. There was some odd vibration, noticeable on a slower turn. Felt like a pulsing and I could feel it on the shifter. (Car was a manual). It is the colors I want and I see plenty like that. I wish I new what the vibration was, more curiosity than anything else
I am now looking to add another, due to budget I am focusing on 2006/2007 and maybe 2008.
If you could consider a 2009 and later, you would avoid some of the irritating issues that are associated with early year C6s. There are many problems you'd have to research on your own, but a 2009+ would be the best choice. Also try to get an LS3 motor, you won't be sorry. For larger people; when you test drive put seat all the way back and lowered, bottom slightly tilted back. This gives more head room, up to an extra 1/2". Also wear regular walking shoes, NO trail shoes or boots that may be wider than normal.
Last edited by RetroGuy; Aug 10, 2025 at 11:26 AM.
If you could consider a 2009 and later, you would avoid some of the irritating issues that are associated with early year C6s. There are many problems you'd have to research on your own, but a 2009+ would be the best choice. Also try to get an LS3 motor, you won't be sorry. For larger people; when you test drive put seat all the way back and lowered, bottom slightly tilted back. This gives more head room, up to an extra 1/2". Also wear regular walking shoes, NO trail shoes or boots that may be wider than normal.
. Yeah budget is driving the model year unless I do a high mile car
Originally Posted by Blackwater0323
Yes, you don't have to deal with the potential valve guide failure.
valve guide failure in the LS2? More info on this please
.
valve guide failure in the LS2? More info on this please
There is no issue with the LS2 or LS3 that I am aware of with valve train issues. I also don’t understand all the problems he was referring to either in early model years. All model years can have a balancer problem hit or miss. If I was looking for a car to build I would get the LS3 but the LS2 is a great engine and I have one. I’ve had my car for 5 years and outside of the door actuator failing that has been it.
If you could consider a 2009 and later, you would avoid some of the irritating issues that are associated with early year C6s. There are many problems you'd have to research on your own, but a 2009+ would be the best choice. Also try to get an LS3 motor, you won't be sorry.
I agree.
There were thresholds of model year issues, be them relatively minor to nil for most C6 owners who drive reasonably normal for commuting and pleasure (not track driving). Being our choice was a life-long decision, I ended up jumping to the last model year 2013 for various reasoning, from both "avoidance of issues" and "best features." I consider 2012 and 2013 to be equal unless 60th anniversary badging holds value. Then 2013 is the year.
There is a video out there somewhere that explains the mechanical failure that the Corvette LS2 can sometime suffer, be it rare. Don't confuse that with the LS7 engine in the ZO6 and 427 which is has a much greater threat of major engine problems.
The 2008-2013 Corvette with the LS3 engine is going to offer the greatest peace of mind concerning C6 engines, yet driving any Corvette hard as a habit will naturally yield something negative like the harmonic balancer as one example.
Last edited by Ron Dittmer; Aug 10, 2025 at 05:25 PM.
. Yeah budget is driving the model year unless I do a high mile car
valve guide failure in the LS2? More info on this please
Valve guide failire in the LS2 is like finding 1000 bitcoins under your pillow. It could happen in theory, but really really improbable.
Valve spring failure in a C5Z on the other hand does happen fairly commonly. Not like, European car failure often, but enough that nobody would fault you for replacing the springs as preventative maintenance.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.