When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Not sure if this has been discussed before. If it has, I apologize. I was just leafing through the December Car and Driver when I noticed an ad for the new Chevy Malibu. The ad makes mention of the Malibu's structural rigidity which is listed as "25.5-hertz first structural mode, a 27.3-hertz body bending frequency and a 33-hertz torsional frequency." Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe these numbers significantly outdo same for the C5 (23-Hertz roof in and 21-Hertz Convertible or roof out) . Given the Corvette's importance in GM's lineup it certainly bodes well for the structural rigidity rating of the C6.
Second, I just saw a road test of the new Pontiac GTO on The Car Connection's website. At the end of the test they say the price of the automatic version of this car will include a $1,000 gas guzzler tax. ???!!! Doesn't GM have a standing rule against gas guzzler taxes on their production cars (does not apply to GMs trucks)? Did I miss something or has Maximum Bob gotten GM to bend a significant rule, the flexibility of which could mean big things for the future power rating of upcoming Corvettes?
Not sure if this has been discussed before. If it has, I apologize. I was just leafing through the December Car and Driver when I noticed an ad for the new Chevy Malibu. The ad makes mention of the Malibu's structural rigidity which is listed as "25.5-hertz first structural mode, a 27.3-hertz body bending frequency and a 33-hertz torsional frequency." Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe these numbers significantly outdo same for the C5 (23-Hertz roof in and 21-Hertz Convertible or roof out) . Given the Corvette's importance in GM's lineup it certainly bodes well for the structural rigidity rating of the C6.
The C5 has 20 Hz for the 'Vert, around 22 for the coupe depending on if the roof is in or out, and 24 for the Z06. Contrary to what we would all hope for, the Malibu's much higher 33 Hz means nothing for the C6. Sedans naturally have higher torsional rigidity frequencies than low-to-the-ground sports cars. And SUVs are stiffer still. The Corvette is limited by its very nature, unless it becomes an SUV. :eek: :lol:
Second, I just saw a road test of the new Pontiac GTO on The Car Connection's website. At the end of the test they say the price of the automatic version of this car will include a $1,000 gas guzzler tax. ???!!! Doesn't GM have a standing rule against gas guzzler taxes on their production cars (does not apply to GMs trucks)? Did I miss something or has Maximum Bob gotten GM to bend a significant rule, the flexibility of which could mean big things for the future power rating of upcoming Corvettes?
I just saw a road test of the new Pontiac GTO on The Car Connection's website. At the end of the test they say the price of the automatic version of this car will include a $1,000 gas guzzler tax. ???!!! Doesn't GM have a standing rule against gas guzzler taxes on their production cars (does not apply to GMs trucks)? Did I miss something or has Maximum Bob gotten GM to bend a significant rule, the flexibility of which could mean big things for the future power rating of upcoming Corvettes?
:skep: Whatever is the General up to? Hmmmm...
This weekend I read the MT, C&D and R&T reviews of the GTO (also saw MT TV review) - all different degrees of positive. None of them mentioned a gas guzzler tax. I would think that would be big news. To my knowledge, no GM car has been subjected to this tax. When I get home tonight I will review the specs on gas milage.
If the gas guzzeler tax was just a rule of thumb it was certainly one prominent rule of thumb. Abandoning it could explain how GM can create a 500+hp Z06.
I know arguing with you is pointless, but that's not true at all.
GM has (had?) a STRICT rule about never selling a car that would be hit with a gas guzzler tax. At least, that's what I got out of ACAR. I guess they changed the rule for the GTO?
I don't know how you all missed (or forgot) this. GM has a strict rule that no GM vehicle be subject to the Gas Guzzler tax. Prior to the GTO, only two american cars actually were subject to this tax. Those were the Mustang Cobra and the Viper. In general it seems that American car companies try pretty hard to avoid the gas guzzler tax. In the case of the GTO, GM decided to make an exception to this rule, specifically for the GTO. I think this happened for two reasons. First, Bob Lutz was the man pulling for the car. Second, they were predicting slightly over 300 hp at first, which would not have been enough for this car. In order to make it perform up to expectations they needed 350 (at least). That hurt fuel economy, but they accepted it because this is a halo vehicle.
They made specific announcements about this fact at least six months ago. Hope that info helps.
GM has (had?) a STRICT rule about never selling a car that would be hit with a gas guzzler tax. At least, that's what I got out of ACAR. I guess they changed the rule for the GTO?
Yes, which would now make it a rule of thumb AKA a guideline. I didn't say it never was a strict rule, just that it isn't now. If the GTO has a gas guzzler tax, then I am right. If the GTO does not, then I am wrong. We shall see.
6 Speed manual = 17City, 29 highway, combined 24.8 MPG equals NO Guzzler tax
4sp / OD Auto = 16City, 21 Highway, combined 21.5 MPG (<gotta be a typo on their site) equals a stated gas gusler tax of $1,000
Many things have changed under Lutz it appears. They have it set up so that I cannot copy here, sorry.
6 Speed manual = 17City, 29 highway, combined 24.8 MPG equals NO Guzzler tax
4sp / OD Auto = 16City, 21 Highway, combined 21.5 MPG (<gotta be a typo on their site) equals a stated gas gusler tax of $1,000
Many things have changed under Lutz it appears. They have it set up so that I cannot copy here, sorry.
Second, I just saw a road test of the new Pontiac GTO on The Car Connection's website. At the end of the test they say the price of the automatic version of this car will include a $1,000 gas guzzler tax. ???!!! Doesn't GM have a standing rule against gas guzzler taxes on their production cars (does not apply to GMs trucks)? Did I miss something or has Maximum Bob gotten GM to bend a significant rule, the flexibility of which could mean big things for the future power rating of upcoming Corvettes?
Based on what? R/T Dec 03 has the GTO at 19 MPG & hwy at 27 MPG so what the guide line for a gass guzzler?
Mmmm, no. Checked Pontiac's website. It is a fact.
:hurray:
If it is a fact that GM has a rule against gas guzzler, then why does a new GM car have the gas guzzler tax?
Because the car is not actually manufactured by Pontiac - it is built by Holden and trying to fix the milage would mean a lot of re-development. Honestly, I'm surprised that the car gets that economy with the auto. Maybe it's just the way they test them over there?
Because the car is not actually manufactured by Pontiac - it is built by Holden and trying to fix the milage would mean a lot of re-development. Honestly, I'm surprised that the car gets that economy with the auto. Maybe it's just the way they test them over there?
Holden is actually using a US spec drivetrains that are federally qualified here in the states. 7.5 MPG seems like a stiff Automatic penalty to me. I wonder if the Auto has a different differential?
Because the car is not actually manufactured by Pontiac - it is built by Holden and trying to fix the milage would mean a lot of re-development. Honestly, I'm surprised that the car gets that economy with the auto. Maybe it's just the way they test them over there?
Holden is actually using a US spec drivetrains that are federally qualified here in the states. 7.5 MPG seems like a stiff Automatic penalty to me. I wonder if the Auto has a different differential?
This is now the GTO section of the C6 forum :D
[Modified by LongTimer, 1:17 AM 11/11/2003]
yes, they are cool cars, but they are a bit slow. And i think that maybee the reason they are gona let the gto slide under the gas guzler rule's radar, is because it is the halo car, and that the standard, gets good milagfe, sorta... :iagree:
p.s. sorry, i think that is a runon!
The Malibu probably sets new records for midsize sedan stiffness, particularly in it's price class. Ten years ago a 25 Hz first mode was considered excellent and what Olds used as a target for the Aurora. Automotive engineers are constantly aiming at higher goals!
I expect the C6 will improve on the C5 structural mode numbers, especially the Z06.
GM's broke there "never pay the guzzler tax" vow in the late eighties when the Allante got tagged.
GTO's with automatic pay the guzzler tax.
The whole idea of the guzzler tax on cars is ridiculous with all the gas guzzling trucks disguised as passenger cars running around. Write your Congressman if you see the same idiocy as I do in the gas guzzler tax.
I made a presentation to my Congressman's staff on incongruities of safety and fuel economy standards for "cars" and "trucks" with particular attention to passenger vehicles that masquarade as trucks and don't have to meet the same safety, emission, and fuel economy standards. Three months later he was voted out of office! I decided trying to talk any sense into his successor, Jane Harmon, was a waste of time.