It's Ugly
☠☣☢ Semper Ebrius ☢☣☠
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 83,301
Likes: 4
From: Virginia
Cruise-In IV-V-VI-VII Veteran
St. Jude's Donor '06
Originally Posted by ae1m
1) Need a front plate like in MA? Their afterthought is a stick on bracket that mounts above the front intake right at the emblem. I was shown it by the GM Engineer at Carlisle.
2) Looks like a Japanese car, not a sleek evolution from the C5 like the C5 was from the C4. Looks stubby and with a short pug nose.
3) Ugly wart for a satellite radio antenna.
4) BAD matching hood to fender panels. Clear paint shade differences on several of the cars in the Kerbeck area.
5) Interior is a dupe of the C5. Steering wheel is butt ugly.
6) Shortened butt looks like a Japanese econobox.
7) Backup lights too low behind bumper louvers are sure to be a problem.
I was able to see a C6 and C5 almost in line from the side, the C5 is much more of a gorgeous car. We will be sacrificing the beauty of the C5 for a 12% HP increase. What a shame. The new orange color looks more bronze, and with low light looks brown.
I'm just trying to figure out why some people feel the need to devote an entire thread to their personal opinion when we already have a thread where everyone can post their opinion of the car. What, is your opinion that much more important that it needs its own thread?
