Notices
C6 Corvette ZR1 & Z06 General info about GM’s Corvette Supercar, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

[Z06] LS7 Rebuild

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2017, 01:51 PM
  #61  
Michael_D
Safety Car
 
Michael_D's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,478
Received 361 Likes on 270 Posts

Default

I really like those pistons. How much did the coating end up running you, and what variant did you go with? Anything in ring groves?
Old 10-07-2017, 02:57 PM
  #62  
lamboworld
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
lamboworld's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,168
Received 144 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michael_D
I really like those pistons. How much did the coating end up running you, and what variant did you go with? Anything in ring groves?
Calico coatings is about 30 minutes from where I live, so they did it. $300 for the tops and skirts and I don't think that the ring groves were coated. The pistons are an "off the shelf" CP piston with a 4.135 bore specifically for the LS7 TI rods. Chrome moly pins with a 180 wall and rings are also included with the pistons for $670, so I have about $1,000 all-in for the pistons.
Old 10-07-2017, 07:17 PM
  #63  
jayyyw
Le Mans Master
 
jayyyw's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 5,617
Received 899 Likes on 688 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lamboworld
It was suggested that I consider a 238/252 115+3 with 650 lift to give more mid range and a little more up top.

I was considering a 238/252 114+3 with a 650 lift. I will either keep my current cam or switch to a Cam Motion cam with one these specs.
Those specs are very close to the Brian Tooley Stage 3. It has 18 degrees overlap. It’ll make 600+ on certain dynos. I have that cam and it drives very well on the highway. I can drive it down to 55-60 in 6th gear with VERY minimal surging.

Honestly, go with a BTR Stage 4 ground on an 8620 core. Since you have a better tuner now, he should be able to get that cam to drive just as good as what you have now. It’ll make more power NA and on spray.
Old 10-07-2017, 08:19 PM
  #64  
AzDave47
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AzDave47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,276
Received 4,539 Likes on 2,614 Posts

Default

Those specs are also close to my Katech K501 cam. It has some modest surging (my first cam'd street car) and it makes good power and torque with MSD, NW102 and ARH 2" w/ catted x-pipe
Old 10-12-2017, 08:41 PM
  #65  
lamboworld
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
lamboworld's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,168
Received 144 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

I decided to go with an new cam from Cam Motion. Here are the specs:

Intake Duration @ .050: 238, Intake Valve Lift: .650, Rocker Ratio Intake: 1.8, Exhaust Duration @ .050: 252, Exhaust Valve Lift: .652, Rocker Ratio Exhaust: 1.8, Lobe Separation: 114, Camshaft Advance: +3, Roller Lifter Wheel Diameter: .70, Options: Hydraulic, Induction Type: Naturally Aspirated, Camshaft Core Types: 3-Bolt, 8620 Steel Alloy Camshaft



Here are some weights:

Stock LS7 block with stock hardware and the caps on it is 107lbs dead even.

Darton Sleeved 5.3 Gen IV block at 4.135 bore with ARP hardware comes in at 105.9 lbs.


Stock LS7 piston weights
Piston - 483 grams
Pin - 132 grams
ring set - 28 grams
total (no locks) 643 grams

Size
top ring 0.47
second ring 0.47
oil ring 2mm


CP pistons BLS1202-010
Pistons - 450 grams with Top and Side Coating
Pin - 122 grams
ring set - 37 grams
total (no locks) 609 grams

Size
top ring 0.58
second ring 0.58
oil ring 3mm

Last edited by lamboworld; 10-12-2017 at 08:49 PM.
The following users liked this post:
HP RESEARCH (10-13-2017)
Old 10-12-2017, 09:36 PM
  #66  
AzDave47
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
AzDave47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,276
Received 4,539 Likes on 2,614 Posts

Default

Your cam specs are very close to my Katech K501.

Katech K501 Camshaft
235 / 251 @ .050, . 657/ .660 lift, 113 LSA
((235+251)/2)-(113*2)
243 - 226 = 17

Last edited by AzDave47; 10-12-2017 at 09:38 PM.
Old 10-13-2017, 10:25 PM
  #67  
rio95
Burning Brakes
 
rio95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan
Posts: 1,138
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Whats with all this recent talk about weaknesses involving the stock rods? I have been on the forums for years and have never once seen or heard of anyone experience a rod bushing/bearing or bolt failure. Is this one of those uneeded "upgrades" that people latch onto like the stupid trunion upgrade? Also what's katech charge for the bushings and bolts if you send them your rods?
Old 10-13-2017, 11:07 PM
  #68  
lamboworld
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
lamboworld's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,168
Received 144 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rio95
Whats with all this recent talk about weaknesses involving the stock rods? I have been on the forums for years and have never once seen or heard of anyone experience a rod bushing/bearing or bolt failure. Is this one of those uneeded "upgrades" that people latch onto like the stupid trunion upgrade? Also what's katech charge for the bushings and bolts if you send them your rods?
You probably missed the update on my rebuild. I am actually reusing the TI Rods and LS7 Crank. I replaced the LS7 block with a Darton Sleeved LS block and I am using CP Forged Pistons. I came to the same conclusion that the weak points are the sleeves, pistons and rod bolts.

I did not replace the rod bushings. Katech charges $100 a rod which is crazy expensive. My engine builder said that they have never seen a bushing failure and I took their advice and just had the bushing resized to fit my PINs.
Old 10-13-2017, 11:44 PM
  #69  
rio95
Burning Brakes
 
rio95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan
Posts: 1,138
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lamboworld
You probably missed the update on my rebuild. I am actually reusing the TI Rods and LS7 Crank. I replaced the LS7 block with a Darton Sleeved LS block and I am using CP Forged Pistons. I came to the same conclusion that the weak points are the sleeves, pistons and rod bolts.

I did not replace the rod bushings. Katech charges $100 a rod which is crazy expensive. My engine builder said that they have never seen a bushing failure and I took their advice and just had the bushing resized to fit my PINs.

No I followed your build just fine. Still thought I'd ask this question since I'm in a similar boat.

Did you figure out the pros and cons of the different block to sleeve? Seems like a lot of people use ls2 blocks for some reasom, but I've seen people use pretty much all of them for a 427+ sleeved short block. I'm guessing a 5.3 block is one of the less expensive options, but are there benefits of the other LS options?
Old 10-19-2017, 06:13 PM
  #70  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rio95
No I followed your build just fine. Still thought I'd ask this question since I'm in a similar boat.

Did you figure out the pros and cons of the different block to sleeve? Seems like a lot of people use ls2 blocks for some reasom, but I've seen people use pretty much all of them for a 427+ sleeved short block. I'm guessing a 5.3 block is one of the less expensive options, but are there benefits of the other LS options?
Probably the biggest reason the 5.3 is used, is that you can find tons of them and the price is lower than a LS3/ LSA / LS9 block...

There are changes in the blocks, the LSA and LS9's are a different material, caps change, piston oilers.....amoung other things. The LS7 has a longer skirt (not that it matters if you sleeve it), steel caps like the LSA/LS9 and a few other small details.

Now the LS6/2/3/7/A/9 engines do have some better internal breathing due to some cuts in the main webbing. This does aid in making more HP on a wet sump engine, dry sump engines it should have little impact on however. That is probably the biggest difference in the actual bare block itself.
Old 10-19-2017, 11:13 PM
  #71  
rio95
Burning Brakes
 
rio95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Grand Rapids Michigan
Posts: 1,138
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HP RESEARCH
Probably the biggest reason the 5.3 is used, is that you can find tons of them and the price is lower than a LS3/ LSA / LS9 block...

There are changes in the blocks, the LSA and LS9's are a different material, caps change, piston oilers.....amoung other things. The LS7 has a longer skirt (not that it matters if you sleeve it), steel caps like the LSA/LS9 and a few other small details.

Now the LS6/2/3/7/A/9 engines do have some better internal breathing due to some cuts in the main webbing. This does aid in making more HP on a wet sump engine, dry sump engines it should have little impact on however. That is probably the biggest difference in the actual bare block itself.
Great info thanks for sharing. It's hard to find this kind of information.
Old 10-20-2017, 04:34 PM
  #72  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rio95
Great info thanks for sharing. It's hard to find this kind of information.
Just some quick pics for a visual. -see notes under each picture.


Left to right: LS7, LS3, 5.3L


5.3L front


LS3 front


LS7 front


5.3L Mains


LS3 Mains


LS7 Mains


LS7 sleeve length, windage cuts on main webbing. Notice they use a very small dowl to locate the caps and from the witness marks notice they have zero register to the block itself.


OEM LS3 sleeve length. Notice the same cuts in the main webbing for windage. Notice no dowls on the caps but register marks now for location (which is generally stronger).


Darton sleeves in a 5.3L block. No cutting to the main webbing in the block and you now have a longer than normal sleeve with the same cap location register as the LS3.
The following 2 users liked this post by HP RESEARCH:
dmartens (04-08-2018), TriSum1 (12-30-2017)
Old 10-20-2017, 10:22 PM
  #73  
Brandon619
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Brandon619's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5,046
Received 242 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Great thread.
Old 10-20-2017, 10:48 PM
  #74  
lamboworld
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
lamboworld's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,168
Received 144 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

After doing a little research.

The LS7 block is cast out of 319-T5 and the 5.3 LH6 block is cast out of A356-T6.

https://sfsa.org/tutorials/eng_block/GMBlock.pdf
Old 10-21-2017, 08:39 AM
  #75  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lamboworld
After doing a little research.

The LS7 block is cast out of 319-T5 and the 5.3 LH6 block is cast out of A356-T6.

https://sfsa.org/tutorials/eng_block/GMBlock.pdf

The LSA and LS9 blocks are LSA are cast from 319-T7 aluminum. The C5R block is a “hipped” and X-rayed 356-T6M aluminum casting. The Chevy site confirms the 319-T5 material for the LS7 block as well.

http://www.chevrolet.com/performance...ylinder-blocks


http://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/gm-engines/lsa/

The LSA/9/7 blocks are also (I believe) the only ones to be torque plate honed from the factory.
Old 10-21-2017, 11:16 AM
  #76  
Buddy A
Melting Slicks
 
Buddy A's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: Corpus Christi Texas
Posts: 2,184
Received 77 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

So is one material stronger than the other? Is one a better foundation or is it just a different material?
Old 10-21-2017, 03:02 PM
  #77  
Ghost Knight
Instructor
 
Ghost Knight's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2016
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 154
Received 22 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Great info!

Get notified of new replies

To LS7 Rebuild

Old 10-21-2017, 04:14 PM
  #78  
Michael_D
Safety Car
 
Michael_D's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,478
Received 361 Likes on 270 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Buddy A
So is one material stronger than the other? Is one a better foundation or is it just a different material?
Yes and no.... The letter and number designations can get confusing.

This is a pretty good summary that doesn't get too far into the metallurgy world. http://www.alcotec.com/us/en/educati...f-aluminum.cfm

Last edited by Michael_D; 10-21-2017 at 04:15 PM. Reason: stinking spell check.....
The following users liked this post:
Buddy A (10-21-2017)
Old 10-25-2017, 01:19 AM
  #79  
lamboworld
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
lamboworld's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,168
Received 144 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

HPR has finished my short block and I am trying to decide what head gasket to use. I am debating between .060, .066 or .075. I am leaning toward the .075 gasket, which will put my CR at 11.34:1. Is there any issue using a .075 gasket and running a 300 shot of Nitrous.
Old 10-25-2017, 08:11 AM
  #80  
Michael_D
Safety Car
 
Michael_D's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,478
Received 361 Likes on 270 Posts

Default

What is piston height? I like to target between .040 quench for steel rod engines, no less than .035. Add ten thou for aluminum rods.


Quick Reply: [Z06] LS7 Rebuild



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.