Restrictor plates
Thanks
Last edited by Zo6BEAST; Mar 15, 2009 at 08:47 PM.
For example, let's say I have a Procharger D-1 head unit with a 4.10" pulley with a maximum boost level of 8 psi at 6,500 RPM. Let's assume that in this example that at 3,000 RPM I am generating 3.5 pounds of boost and 250 RWHP and 300 RWTQ. Let's also assume that I want to have better low end performance (greater low end TQ and HP). The solution to my problem is to get a smaller pulley, say a 3.8" pulley, which may generate 5 lbs of boost at 3,000 RPM instead of the 3.5 lbs associated with the larger 4.1" pulley, and as a result increase my HP from 250 to 300 at 3,000 RPM, and increase of my TQ from 300 to 350 at the same 3,000 RPM level.
But let's also assume that I have a stock bottom end, and the smaller pulley will generate too much boost at higher RPMs than I am willing to run (due to the level of reduced safety associated with higher levels of boost at higher RPMs). Let's assume that the smaller pulley will generate 11 lbs of boost at 6,500 RPM, and that is too much boost for my stock bottom end. The solution to my problem is that I can then install a restrictor plate and limit the maximum boost at higher RPMs to a level I feel is safe, let's say 10 lbs, while still generating increased boost (and therefore HP and TQ) at lower/mid RPMs levels.
Bottom line is that a restrictor plate allows for higher boost levels via a smaller pulley, and therefore higher HP and TQ levels, in low and mid RPM levels, without having to contend with too much boost at higher RPM levels (by limiting the maximum flow of the head unit).
It's kind of like having your cake and eating it too. Because, when you get right down to it, what the hell good is a piece of cake unless you get to eat is as well. Cake may be fun to look at, but it's a whole lot more fun to eat it than just to look at it. Maximum HP and TQ at higher RPMs is great, but having a higher HP and TQ profile at low/moderate RPMs, as well as at higher RPMs, offers better overall performance/enjoyment.
Last edited by thomas walters; Mar 15, 2009 at 10:56 PM.
For example, let's say I have a Procharger D-1 head unit with a 4.10" pulley with a maximum boost level of 8 psi at 6,500 RPM. Let's assume that in this example that at 3,000 RPM I am generating 3.5 pounds of boost and 250 RWHP and 300 RWTQ. Let's also assume that I want to have better low end performance (greater low end TQ and HP). The solution to my problem is to get a smaller pulley, say a 3.8" pulley, which may generate 5 lbs of boost at 3,000 RPM instead of the 3.5 lbs associated with the larger 4.1" pulley, and as a result increase my HP from 250 to 300 at 3,000 RPM, and increase of my TQ from 300 to 350 at the same 3,000 RPM level.
But let's also assume that I have a stock bottom end, and the smaller pulley will generate too much boost at higher RPMs than I am willing to run (due to the level of reduced safety associated with higher levels of boost at higher RPMs). Let's assume that the smaller pulley will generate 11 lbs of boost at 6,500 RPM, and that is too much boost for my stock bottom end. The solution to my problem is that I can then install a restrictor plate and limit the maximum boost at higher RPMs to a level I feel is safe, let's say 10 lbs, while still generating increased boost (and therefore HP and TQ) at lower/mid RPMs levels.
Bottom line is that a restrictor plate allows for higher boost levels via a smaller pulley, and therefore higher HP and TQ levels, in low and mid RPM levels, without having to contend with too much boost at higher RPM levels (by limiting the maximum flow of the head unit).
It's kind of like having your cake and eating it too. Because, when you get right down to it, what the hell good is a piece of cake unless you get to eat is as well. Cake may be fun to look at, but it's a whole lot more fun to eat it than just to look at it. Maximum HP and TQ at higher RPMs is great, but having a higher HP and TQ profile at low/moderate RPMs, as well as at higher RPMs, offers better overall performance/enjoyment.
For example, let's say I have a Procharger D-1 head unit with a 4.10" pulley with a maximum boost level of 8 psi at 6,500 RPM. Let's assume that in this example that at 3,000 RPM I am generating 3.5 pounds of boost and 250 RWHP and 300 RWTQ. Let's also assume that I want to have better low end performance (greater low end TQ and HP). The solution to my problem is to get a smaller pulley, say a 3.8" pulley, which may generate 5 lbs of boost at 3,000 RPM instead of the 3.5 lbs associated with the larger 4.1" pulley, and as a result increase my HP from 250 to 300 at 3,000 RPM, and increase of my TQ from 300 to 350 at the same 3,000 RPM level.
But let's also assume that I have a stock bottom end, and the smaller pulley will generate too much boost at higher RPMs than I am willing to run (due to the level of reduced safety associated with higher levels of boost at higher RPMs). Let's assume that the smaller pulley will generate 11 lbs of boost at 6,500 RPM, and that is too much boost for my stock bottom end. The solution to my problem is that I can then install a restrictor plate and limit the maximum boost at higher RPMs to a level I feel is safe, let's say 10 lbs, while still generating increased boost (and therefore HP and TQ) at lower/mid RPMs levels.
Bottom line is that a restrictor plate allows for higher boost levels via a smaller pulley, and therefore higher HP and TQ levels, in low and mid RPM levels, without having to contend with too much boost at higher RPM levels (by limiting the maximum flow of the head unit).
It's kind of like having your cake and eating it too. Because, when you get right down to it, what the hell good is a piece of cake unless you get to eat is as well. Cake may be fun to look at, but it's a whole lot more fun to eat it than just to look at it. Maximum HP and TQ at higher RPMs is great, but having a higher HP and TQ profile at low/moderate RPMs, as well as at higher RPMs, offers better overall performance/enjoyment.
For example, let's say I have a Procharger D-1 head unit with a 4.10" pulley with a maximum boost level of 8 psi at 6,500 RPM. Let's assume that in this example that at 3,000 RPM I am generating 3.5 pounds of boost and 250 RWHP and 300 RWTQ. Let's also assume that I want to have better low end performance (greater low end TQ and HP). The solution to my problem is to get a smaller pulley, say a 3.8" pulley, which may generate 5 lbs of boost at 3,000 RPM instead of the 3.5 lbs associated with the larger 4.1" pulley, and as a result increase my HP from 250 to 300 at 3,000 RPM, and increase of my TQ from 300 to 350 at the same 3,000 RPM level.
But let's also assume that I have a stock bottom end, and the smaller pulley will generate too much boost at higher RPMs than I am willing to run (due to the level of reduced safety associated with higher levels of boost at higher RPMs). Let's assume that the smaller pulley will generate 11 lbs of boost at 6,500 RPM, and that is too much boost for my stock bottom end. The solution to my problem is that I can then install a restrictor plate and limit the maximum boost at higher RPMs to a level I feel is safe, let's say 10 lbs, while still generating increased boost (and therefore HP and TQ) at lower/mid RPMs levels.
Bottom line is that a restrictor plate allows for higher boost levels via a smaller pulley, and therefore higher HP and TQ levels, in low and mid RPM levels, without having to contend with too much boost at higher RPM levels (by limiting the maximum flow of the head unit).
It's kind of like having your cake and eating it too. Because, when you get right down to it, what the hell good is a piece of cake unless you get to eat is as well. Cake may be fun to look at, but it's a whole lot more fun to eat it than just to look at it. Maximum HP and TQ at higher RPMs is great, but having a higher HP and TQ profile at low/moderate RPMs, as well as at higher RPMs, offers better overall performance/enjoyment.
For example, let's say I have a Procharger D-1 head unit with a 4.10" pulley with a maximum boost level of 8 psi at 6,500 RPM. Let's assume that in this example that at 3,000 RPM I am generating 3.5 pounds of boost and 250 RWHP and 300 RWTQ. Let's also assume that I want to have better low end performance (greater low end TQ and HP). The solution to my problem is to get a smaller pulley, say a 3.8" pulley, which may generate 5 lbs of boost at 3,000 RPM instead of the 3.5 lbs associated with the larger 4.1" pulley, and as a result increase my HP from 250 to 300 at 3,000 RPM, and increase of my TQ from 300 to 350 at the same 3,000 RPM level.
But let's also assume that I have a stock bottom end, and the smaller pulley will generate too much boost at higher RPMs than I am willing to run (due to the level of reduced safety associated with higher levels of boost at higher RPMs). Let's assume that the smaller pulley will generate 11 lbs of boost at 6,500 RPM, and that is too much boost for my stock bottom end. The solution to my problem is that I can then install a restrictor plate and limit the maximum boost at higher RPMs to a level I feel is safe, let's say 10 lbs, while still generating increased boost (and therefore HP and TQ) at lower/mid RPMs levels.
Bottom line is that a restrictor plate allows for higher boost levels via a smaller pulley, and therefore higher HP and TQ levels, in low and mid RPM levels, without having to contend with too much boost at higher RPM levels (by limiting the maximum flow of the head unit).
It's kind of like having your cake and eating it too. Because, when you get right down to it, what the hell good is a piece of cake unless you get to eat is as well. Cake may be fun to look at, but it's a whole lot more fun to eat it than just to look at it. Maximum HP and TQ at higher RPMs is great, but having a higher HP and TQ profile at low/moderate RPMs, as well as at higher RPMs, offers better overall performance/enjoyment.
BTW...a re-tune will be in order after changing your pulley and installing a restrictor plate.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Last edited by duff70; Mar 17, 2009 at 11:03 PM.
For example, let's say I have a Procharger D-1 head unit with a 4.10" pulley with a maximum boost level of 8 psi at 6,500 RPM. Let's assume that in this example that at 3,000 RPM I am generating 3.5 pounds of boost and 250 RWHP and 300 RWTQ. Let's also assume that I want to have better low end performance (greater low end TQ and HP). The solution to my problem is to get a smaller pulley, say a 3.8" pulley, which may generate 5 lbs of boost at 3,000 RPM instead of the 3.5 lbs associated with the larger 4.1" pulley, and as a result increase my HP from 250 to 300 at 3,000 RPM, and increase of my TQ from 300 to 350 at the same 3,000 RPM level.
But let's also assume that I have a stock bottom end, and the smaller pulley will generate too much boost at higher RPMs than I am willing to run (due to the level of reduced safety associated with higher levels of boost at higher RPMs). Let's assume that the smaller pulley will generate 11 lbs of boost at 6,500 RPM, and that is too much boost for my stock bottom end. The solution to my problem is that I can then install a restrictor plate and limit the maximum boost at higher RPMs to a level I feel is safe, let's say 10 lbs, while still generating increased boost (and therefore HP and TQ) at lower/mid RPMs levels.
Bottom line is that a restrictor plate allows for higher boost levels via a smaller pulley, and therefore higher HP and TQ levels, in low and mid RPM levels, without having to contend with too much boost at higher RPM levels (by limiting the maximum flow of the head unit).
It's kind of like having your cake and eating it too. Because, when you get right down to it, what the hell good is a piece of cake unless you get to eat is as well. Cake may be fun to look at, but it's a whole lot more fun to eat it than just to look at it. Maximum HP and TQ at higher RPMs is great, but having a higher HP and TQ profile at low/moderate RPMs, as well as at higher RPMs, offers better overall performance/enjoyment.
Chris.




For example, let's say I have a Procharger D-1 head unit with a 4.10" pulley with a maximum boost level of 8 psi at 6,500 RPM. Let's assume that in this example that at 3,000 RPM I am generating 3.5 pounds of boost and 250 RWHP and 300 RWTQ. Let's also assume that I want to have better low end performance (greater low end TQ and HP). The solution to my problem is to get a smaller pulley, say a 3.8" pulley, which may generate 5 lbs of boost at 3,000 RPM instead of the 3.5 lbs associated with the larger 4.1" pulley, and as a result increase my HP from 250 to 300 at 3,000 RPM, and increase of my TQ from 300 to 350 at the same 3,000 RPM level.
But let's also assume that I have a stock bottom end, and the smaller pulley will generate too much boost at higher RPMs than I am willing to run (due to the level of reduced safety associated with higher levels of boost at higher RPMs). Let's assume that the smaller pulley will generate 11 lbs of boost at 6,500 RPM, and that is too much boost for my stock bottom end. The solution to my problem is that I can then install a restrictor plate and limit the maximum boost at higher RPMs to a level I feel is safe, let's say 10 lbs, while still generating increased boost (and therefore HP and TQ) at lower/mid RPMs levels.
Bottom line is that a restrictor plate allows for higher boost levels via a smaller pulley, and therefore higher HP and TQ levels, in low and mid RPM levels, without having to contend with too much boost at higher RPM levels (by limiting the maximum flow of the head unit).
It's kind of like having your cake and eating it too. Because, when you get right down to it, what the hell good is a piece of cake unless you get to eat is as well. Cake may be fun to look at, but it's a whole lot more fun to eat it than just to look at it. Maximum HP and TQ at higher RPMs is great, but having a higher HP and TQ profile at low/moderate RPMs, as well as at higher RPMs, offers better overall performance/enjoyment.
Spot on, nice write up.
We came up with this set up when I was disappointed by the lack of torque compared to the turbo cars, we have tons of hours testing with our SC kit so when we send one out with the kit they are right where they need to be boost wise to achieve nearly the same TQ as HP.
This way, as you stated, you can have your cake (the simplicity of a centrifugal SC) while eating it too (the TQ of a turbo car without the expense and complications).
We have no problem explaining how to make one yourself, they are relatively basic, but there is some trial and error to get it right as far as the sizing goes. Fortunately it is all figured out for you when you purchase your supercharger from ECS!

We sell them for $24 separately Tony, but when not used with an ECS kit we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the boost levels.

C5/C6 and C7 Supercharging Specialist
ECS Supercharger Kits / Mantic Clutches
www.EastCoastSupercharging.com
Facebook Page
ECS YouTube Channel

Some have tabs and some are just press fit into the grooves on the filter (as pictured) and then held in by the tubing/inlet. At least that's my understanding of it.










