DALLAS PERFROMANCE INTAKE vs FAST 102
#1
DALLAS PERFROMANCE INTAKE vs FAST 102
Im really curious how the Dallas Performance intake does vs the {Mast Motorsports PI,Cary intake} LXR intake. But seeing how not alot of guys are willing to run a serious hood for the LXR intake I would like to know the gains the Dallas Performance intake {victor jr with elbow}has over a ported FAST 102?
What I have been told it that the guys at Mast Motorsports basicly did testing with the victor jr style intake,fast intake and the stock intake then designed the LXR to give you the best of both worlds. equal runner length and longer runners.
Here is a NA DYNO pull graph from a 9:5:1 ls7 lsx with a cam motion turbo grind. This is on a engine dyno.
as you can see the LXR did fall short threw the low and mid range. it took off where the fast signed off. Im curious if this is what the victor graph would have looked like. Would the victor had made way less torque? same? would the hp have looked the same or less?
thoughts?
What I have been told it that the guys at Mast Motorsports basicly did testing with the victor jr style intake,fast intake and the stock intake then designed the LXR to give you the best of both worlds. equal runner length and longer runners.
Here is a NA DYNO pull graph from a 9:5:1 ls7 lsx with a cam motion turbo grind. This is on a engine dyno.
as you can see the LXR did fall short threw the low and mid range. it took off where the fast signed off. Im curious if this is what the victor graph would have looked like. Would the victor had made way less torque? same? would the hp have looked the same or less?
thoughts?
#2
Former Vendor
You really can't compare NA combo to FI.
With that being said I don't have any experience with the LXR intake because it would require a massive hood. Our single plane intakes do pick up power throughout of FI applications over the FAST 92s. Not sure on the 102.
Hope that helps.
With that being said I don't have any experience with the LXR intake because it would require a massive hood. Our single plane intakes do pick up power throughout of FI applications over the FAST 92s. Not sure on the 102.
Hope that helps.
#3
You really can't compare NA combo to FI.
With that being said I don't have any experience with the LXR intake because it would require a massive hood. Our single plane intakes do pick up power throughout of FI applications over the FAST 92s. Not sure on the 102.
Hope that helps.
With that being said I don't have any experience with the LXR intake because it would require a massive hood. Our single plane intakes do pick up power throughout of FI applications over the FAST 92s. Not sure on the 102.
Hope that helps.
#5
Former Vendor
The DP intake is the wilson Billet Bank. It loses power on NA setups. Picks up from 6-7, but the car is slower. On an FI setup, I wouldnt push a plastic intake at the boost levels taylor is running, so the aluminum piece is the only way.
http://www.wilsonmanifolds.com/produ...manifolds.html
Having said that, If you could physically fit the PI/Mast intake, its worth 50-70 hp, but its ginormous in size.
http://www.wilsonmanifolds.com/produ...manifolds.html
Having said that, If you could physically fit the PI/Mast intake, its worth 50-70 hp, but its ginormous in size.
#6
Im not looking to push a plastic intake at all. Just seeing how a victor jr would compare to the LXR intake. And since no one has hood room for a lxr Im curious the difference between the FAST and the victor jr.
Having said that, If you could physically fit the PI/Mast intake, its worth 50-70 hp, but its ginormous in size.
The graph above is my motor on a engine dyno. Na it gained 25hp and lost 10tq peak. Now under boost that may be a completely different story. Im just wonder if the LXR is really worth the money or will the victor jr perform just as well for less money.
#7
Former Vendor
In a boost application the Vic. Jr. would probably perform almost identically. Only one way to know for sure though...
#8