C6 Forced Induction/Nitrous C6 Corvette Turbochargers, Superchargers, Pulley Upgrades, Intercoolers, Wet and Dry Nitrous Injection, Meth
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Compression Ratio Gurus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2016, 01:19 AM
  #1  
winters97gt
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Somewhere in the Mid 9's TX
Posts: 8,292
Received 77 Likes on 65 Posts

Default Compression Ratio Gurus

I did the calculations on my motor being built, and I've come up with the following.




My builder is telling me that this setup with -15cc Pistons is going to be 10.25:1. That's not what 5 liter eater or myself got. We got the same numbers. He's extremely reluctant to build the motor and wanted to go with -20 to -22 Pistons and wants me to assure him this motor won't see pump gas+meth. It's an iron 370 with PRC 227 heads that were cut down when I lifted them on the 347 when the meth failed. So that's where the 58.6cc head info is coming from. Car has a Novi 2500(YSI) with a 2.85 pulley. Probably in the 850-900 area.

This isn't my first rodeo. But I also don't build engines for a living. I had a 402 in my C6 that was probably closer to 11.1:1 with the milled LS3 heads and Novi 1500. Car made 850/800 on that tiny blower on pump and meth. It's still living a few owners later and beat on like a rag doll. But I've also blown my share of motors.

I do plan on running E85 most likely. That, or gulf 116+ meth if I don't change my current fuel system. But for cruising, not racing, I'd like to stick to pump + meth.

Should I run the -15 or -20 Pistons?

Last edited by winters97gt; 04-03-2016 at 01:21 AM.
Old 04-03-2016, 08:14 AM
  #2  
realcanuk
Le Mans Master
 
realcanuk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Location: Montreal
Posts: 7,818
Received 395 Likes on 360 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13

Default

My engine, although different, is exactly 9.9* with -15 pistons and both the builder and myself agreed it's perfect for my use. Running a YSI at near 20lbs on 94 and meth. The motor has met all expectations !!
Old 04-03-2016, 08:59 AM
  #3  
SBCGENII
Melting Slicks
 
SBCGENII's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 2,225
Received 42 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Anything taken off the deck?
Old 04-03-2016, 11:53 AM
  #4  
old motorhead
Le Mans Master
 
old motorhead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 6,525
Received 1,346 Likes on 953 Posts

Default

Camshaft choice/DCR is going to matter also. A narrow LSA n/a type cam will run the DCR up compared to a wider LSA blower spec cam.
Old 04-08-2016, 06:41 AM
  #5  
winters97gt
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Somewhere in the Mid 9's TX
Posts: 8,292
Received 77 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

It's the Jam Cam, wide LSA. 116+4. Shouldn't effect it much, Rodney.
Old 04-08-2016, 06:42 AM
  #6  
winters97gt
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Somewhere in the Mid 9's TX
Posts: 8,292
Received 77 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

Nothing off the deck.
Old 04-08-2016, 08:03 AM
  #7  
old motorhead
Le Mans Master
 
old motorhead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 6,525
Received 1,346 Likes on 953 Posts

Default

I got just slightly under 10:1 also. Even if it was 10.2, I can't see that being hugely bad. Especially on E85. All else equal, you might not be able to run quite as much spark advance with the slightly higher CR. With the kind of octane you're going to be using, I wouldn't worry about it.
The following users liked this post:
winters97gt (04-10-2016)
Old 04-08-2016, 09:41 AM
  #8  
SquatchMachining
Pro
 
SquatchMachining's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Posts: 580
Received 44 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

OK.


Your math is correct regarding the compression ratio, your builder is wrong. I would be really reluctant to use a builder that cannot come up with correct static compression.


I like to see compression right around 9.8-10.2 for what you are doing and you seem to be right where you need to be. The thing that concerns me is the zero deck height for a couple reasons..


1. Neither Diamond or Wiseco make a off the shelf -15cc piston for the 3.622" stroke with a 4.035 bore that I can see, so im assuming this is a custom piston? You will need to ensure that the block is decked and measured before you order them if you want a true "0" deck because you will need to order them with the correct wrist pin location/height.


2. I think that building the engine with a "0" deck is silly if you are using a .051" gasket. Having the engine built with the piston .010" out of the hole will give you a much better quench. That or use a gasket that is .010" thinner.


I would also opt for upgraded tool steel wrist pins right away.


Just my $.02
The following users liked this post:
winters97gt (04-10-2016)
Old 04-08-2016, 02:52 PM
  #9  
lt1z
Melting Slicks
 
lt1z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,569
Received 170 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

Compression looks right.

Dynamic with that cam would be about 7.42:1

Should work just fine.
The following users liked this post:
winters97gt (04-10-2016)
Old 04-08-2016, 06:18 PM
  #10  
old motorhead
Le Mans Master
 
old motorhead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Southeast TX
Posts: 6,525
Received 1,346 Likes on 953 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lt1z
Compression looks right.

Dynamic with that cam would be about 7.42:1

Should work just fine.
I get an even lower DCR than that. Does your DCR calculator use intake duration or intake valve closing angle? I'm assuming the cam uses Comp lobes. Not sure of the lobe style, so that may be where I'm off.
The following users liked this post:
winters97gt (04-10-2016)
Old 04-08-2016, 07:43 PM
  #11  
winters97gt
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Somewhere in the Mid 9's TX
Posts: 8,292
Received 77 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SquatchMachining
OK.


Your math is correct regarding the compression ratio, your builder is wrong. I would be really reluctant to use a builder that cannot come up with correct static compression.


I like to see compression right around 9.8-10.2 for what you are doing and you seem to be right where you need to be. The thing that concerns me is the zero deck height for a couple reasons..


1. Neither Diamond or Wiseco make a off the shelf -15cc piston for the 3.622" stroke with a 4.035 bore that I can see, so im assuming this is a custom piston? You will need to ensure that the block is decked and measured before you order them if you want a true "0" deck because you will need to order them with the correct wrist pin location/height.


2. I think that building the engine with a "0" deck is silly if you are using a .051" gasket. Having the engine built with the piston .010" out of the hole will give you a much better quench. That or use a gasket that is .010" thinner.


I would also opt for upgraded tool steel wrist pins right away.


Just my $.02
Thanks.

1. Yes, it's a custom piston being cut by Wiseco. My builder wanted to go -20cc and I didn't. The car is all top end, it's gutless down low.

2. The zero deck height was just a base reference since I wasn't sure. Many guys here run his motors, including guys like Flash, etc.

I do have the steel wrist pins going in. I'm backing off the 2.85 pulley and going with a 3.125 on my Novi 2500. Going to keep the power at 775-800. Then I'll put the 2.85 back on for the fall when it cools back down to race with a single M15 nozzle. Should be around 900rwhp give or take.
Old 04-08-2016, 08:51 PM
  #12  
Louis Gigliotti
Instructor
 
Louis Gigliotti's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2015
Location: Ft Worth Tx
Posts: 233
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Anything less than 10.5:1 on boost, is silly, unless it's STRICTLY a pump gas car.

I'd be 11-11.5:1, if I were you.
The following users liked this post:
C6 Curtis (04-08-2016)
Old 04-08-2016, 09:09 PM
  #13  
C6 Curtis
Burning Brakes
 
C6 Curtis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,145
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Louis Gigliotti
Anything less than 10.5:1 on boost, is silly, unless it's STRICTLY a pump gas car.

I'd be 11-11.5:1, if I were you.
Lol +1 I'm 13:8.1 with a Precision NMCA 7691 very fun

-Curtis
Old 04-09-2016, 12:36 PM
  #14  
JasonCzerak
Racer
 
JasonCzerak's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2015
Posts: 296
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

11.25:1, e85, and 13-14psi@7000 rpm here. High compression is awesome.
Old 04-09-2016, 05:46 PM
  #15  
winters97gt
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Somewhere in the Mid 9's TX
Posts: 8,292
Received 77 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JasonCzerak
11.25:1, e85, and 13-14psi@7000 rpm here. High compression is awesome.
Yes, I used to have a higher compression build in my C6 and trapped 149+ on 12psi, this setup is way different.
Old 04-09-2016, 05:48 PM
  #16  
winters97gt
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Somewhere in the Mid 9's TX
Posts: 8,292
Received 77 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C6 Curtis
Lol +1 I'm 13:8.1 with a Precision NMCA 7691 very fun

-Curtis
Yes, but are you at that compression on 23-25psi? That's what my Novi 2500 makes on this setup on the last 370 setup. This is the same.
Old 04-09-2016, 08:09 PM
  #17  
C6 Curtis
Burning Brakes
 
C6 Curtis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,145
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by winters97gt
Yes, but are you at that compression on 23-25psi? That's what my Novi 2500 makes on this setup on the last 370 setup. This is the same.
My old set up with an Old billet wheel standard cover s480 made 837whp/741tq @ 5.8psi. I didn't get my new turbo setup retuned yet but I will be running a direct port methanol kit along with E85 for anything over 10psi. You should be fine as long as you have the proper fueling and octane even at 25+psi. Not sure if you heard of extreme tuners from Greece but they actually had an Evo (4G63) de-stroked and running 17:5.1 compression with a GTX55 C16 fuel I believe. Made insane power.








-Curtis

Last edited by C6 Curtis; 04-09-2016 at 08:13 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To Compression Ratio Gurus

Old 04-09-2016, 09:40 PM
  #18  
schpenxel
Race Director
 
schpenxel's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 16,664
Received 1,194 Likes on 1,053 Posts
St. Jude Donor '15

Default

How the hell do you even get the fender on that thing? lol
Old 04-10-2016, 04:18 PM
  #19  
lt1z
Melting Slicks
 
lt1z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,569
Received 170 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by old motorhead
I got just slightly under 10:1 also. Even if it was 10.2, I can't see that being hugely bad. Especially on E85. All else equal, you might not be able to run quite as much spark advance with the slightly higher CR. With the kind of octane you're going to be using, I wouldn't worry about it.
Based upon LXL lobes with the given info and .006 closing point
The following users liked this post:
winters97gt (04-10-2016)
Old 04-10-2016, 09:41 PM
  #20  
winters97gt
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
winters97gt's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Somewhere in the Mid 9's TX
Posts: 8,292
Received 77 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

I'm curious how the 58.6 heads will do. I'm thinking less timing. I've decided to run a 3.125 pulley on the car for now and take the 2.85 off. I'll put the 2.85 back on it when the air cools back down and see if I can't crack off some 9.50's.

Thanks for the replies.


Quick Reply: Compression Ratio Gurus



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.