HPR LS3/LSA build finishing up **820+ wheel HP**
#1
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
HPR LS3/LSA build finishing up **820+ wheel HP**
Results are coming in from one of our latest LS builds and showing some very impressive results.
Engine build details:
Our customer finished the install with a Maggie Heartbeat supercharger, 102mm TB, 1 7/8 headers and fuel system.
**Before run was with prior package already installed. Car is a 6spd manual**
Pistons, rods, and rings ready for assembly
Short block finished after machine work, cleaning, and balancing
MAST 255cc cylinder heads
Mast intake runner
Morel travel limited lifters
Top end package with ARP studs, GM LS9 gaskets, MAST heads and Jesel rockers
Jesel's zero thrust shaft mounted rocker arms
Long block finished
In the car with the Maggie supercharger ready for dyno!
For a mild combo that can be used as a daily on normal pump fuel (not E85) the package turned out very well!
Granted this was in a CTSV, but the same package can be done on the C6 platform using the same supercharger and engine build.
Hopefully I'll have some video from the customer later this week!
Engine build details:
- GM LSA engine block
- GM LSA crankshaft
- HPR/Wiseco Piston set
- HPR/Wiseco H beam connecting rods
- HPR spec'd hyd roller cam (231/247 .629/.629)
- Morel travel limited link bar lifters with 0.750" wheels
- HPR double taper 7/16" double taper pushrods
- MAST 255cc LS3/LSA cylinder heads
- Jesel 'zero thrust' 1.7 shaft mount rocker arms
- C5R timing chain
- All machine work done in house at HPR
- All assembly done in house at HPR
Our customer finished the install with a Maggie Heartbeat supercharger, 102mm TB, 1 7/8 headers and fuel system.
**Before run was with prior package already installed. Car is a 6spd manual**
Pistons, rods, and rings ready for assembly
Short block finished after machine work, cleaning, and balancing
MAST 255cc cylinder heads
Mast intake runner
Morel travel limited lifters
Top end package with ARP studs, GM LS9 gaskets, MAST heads and Jesel rockers
Jesel's zero thrust shaft mounted rocker arms
Long block finished
In the car with the Maggie supercharger ready for dyno!
For a mild combo that can be used as a daily on normal pump fuel (not E85) the package turned out very well!
Granted this was in a CTSV, but the same package can be done on the C6 platform using the same supercharger and engine build.
Hopefully I'll have some video from the customer later this week!
#2
Le Mans Master
That's pretty dam spicy right there! Makes for one mean a$$ed Caddy. Just curious what diameter crank pulley and blower pulley you're using. Also, how much boost you're seeing. Congrats on a job well done
The following users liked this post:
HP RESEARCH (08-10-2017)
#3
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
I would need to check with them on that, as we didn't put that side of the setup together. I do know he told me it was making around 16-17 psi of boost measured at the engine and that was a 'warm' pull after they had done some more break in with it on the dyno.
#4
Nice build, with some impressive and expensive parts.
What cubic inch is it?
Are you saying that it's making that kind of power @ 16-17psi on pump gas alone???
Looks like the upper pulley is ~75mm, and the Caddys can a 9+" pulley on the Crank, so they can spin the snot out of those Hbeat blowers, compared to the C6 version.
In a C6 application, that build would make substantially less power, due to the C6 Hbeat kits pulley constraints, lower lid height/smaller charge air coolers and the unavailability of a larger inlet for the larger throttle body.
What cubic inch is it?
Are you saying that it's making that kind of power @ 16-17psi on pump gas alone???
Looks like the upper pulley is ~75mm, and the Caddys can a 9+" pulley on the Crank, so they can spin the snot out of those Hbeat blowers, compared to the C6 version.
In a C6 application, that build would make substantially less power, due to the C6 Hbeat kits pulley constraints, lower lid height/smaller charge air coolers and the unavailability of a larger inlet for the larger throttle body.
#5
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Nice build, with some impressive and expensive parts.
What cubic inch is it?
Are you saying that it's making that kind of power @ 16-17psi on pump gas alone???
Looks like the upper pulley is ~75mm, and the Caddys can a 9+" pulley on the Crank, so they can spin the snot out of those Hbeat blowers, compared to the C6 version.
In a C6 application, that build would make substantially less power, due to the C6 Hbeat kits pulley constraints, lower lid height/smaller charge air coolers and the unavailability of a larger inlet for the larger throttle body.
What cubic inch is it?
Are you saying that it's making that kind of power @ 16-17psi on pump gas alone???
Looks like the upper pulley is ~75mm, and the Caddys can a 9+" pulley on the Crank, so they can spin the snot out of those Hbeat blowers, compared to the C6 version.
In a C6 application, that build would make substantially less power, due to the C6 Hbeat kits pulley constraints, lower lid height/smaller charge air coolers and the unavailability of a larger inlet for the larger throttle body.
It has a meth kit on it, talking to the tuner last night they hadn't started to spray it yet, but I should get details on the pulley combo, more pics, and some video's of it. Bad thing about not being there while it is on the dyno, no first hand perspective. I believe he told me the upper pulley was a 2.55" but I need to confirm the lower size.
Last edited by HP RESEARCH; 08-10-2017 at 09:00 AM.
#6
Le Mans Master
I see that the LSA block is around $750 more than the LS3 block. What are the advantages of using the LSA block and at what power level does it make sense to go to the LSA block?
#7
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
#8
Le Mans Master
The LSA has a steel main cap vs the iron on the LS2/3 blocks. The LSA has piston oilers, which in some respects can be good and bad both depending on the build (they can be used or plugged). The LSA does use a slightly different process / aluminum alloy like the LS9 blocks. Now if any of these add up to more reliability, hard to say. we have both blocks in the four digit power levels and they all seem to "wear" about the same.
#9
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
The LS engine platform as a whole is a oil bath machine. Rather than have the oil drain backs running along the sides of the block (like say a late model Hemi or Ford), they dump the oil right down the valley ontop of the crankshaft which then throws oil all over the place. So typically having oil reach the pistons / piston pins is not an issue. On larger stroke engines they can get in the way which either requires a special sprayer or machine work to the pistons for clearance.
I don't know for sure but I would say the factory did it for some sort of emissions reasons and keeping the tops of the pistons cooler possibly. Again, that is just a theory.
If it was a hard core dry sump system, say 5+ stages that can really pull a lot of vacuum then you might want or need to have them in there. In most applications that we have done over the years, including some 1000+ hp Texas Mile cars, we have never had any issues NOT using them and blocking the ports off.
I don't know for sure but I would say the factory did it for some sort of emissions reasons and keeping the tops of the pistons cooler possibly. Again, that is just a theory.
If it was a hard core dry sump system, say 5+ stages that can really pull a lot of vacuum then you might want or need to have them in there. In most applications that we have done over the years, including some 1000+ hp Texas Mile cars, we have never had any issues NOT using them and blocking the ports off.
The following users liked this post:
Chiselchst (09-10-2018)
#10
Le Mans Master
The LS engine platform as a whole is a oil bath machine. Rather than have the oil drain backs running along the sides of the block (like say a late model Hemi or Ford), they dump the oil right down the valley ontop of the crankshaft which then throws oil all over the place. So typically having oil reach the pistons / piston pins is not an issue. On larger stroke engines they can get in the way which either requires a special sprayer or machine work to the pistons for clearance.
I don't know for sure but I would say the factory did it for some sort of emissions reasons and keeping the tops of the pistons cooler possibly. Again, that is just a theory.
If it was a hard core dry sump system, say 5+ stages that can really pull a lot of vacuum then you might want or need to have them in there. In most applications that we have done over the years, including some 1000+ hp Texas Mile cars, we have never had any issues NOT using them and blocking the ports off.
I don't know for sure but I would say the factory did it for some sort of emissions reasons and keeping the tops of the pistons cooler possibly. Again, that is just a theory.
If it was a hard core dry sump system, say 5+ stages that can really pull a lot of vacuum then you might want or need to have them in there. In most applications that we have done over the years, including some 1000+ hp Texas Mile cars, we have never had any issues NOT using them and blocking the ports off.