When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Close, yes. The fact that the C6 is both a front and bottom breather may make things a little worse... or better. You never know sometimes, but that part of the equation is a bit different. Also, I think the intakes for the C5 and C6 are a little different as far as angle and actualy placement.
But yes, close enough to make me roll through puddles with the clutch in at idle.
Mike
I was at idle, max vac, 2 sec later my world was changed.
I was at idle, max vac, 2 sec later my world was changed.
But were you rolling, did you have a manual tranny, and was the clutch out? If so, your drivetrain would still have enough momentum to mangle the engine even at idle.
The Z06 has a functional hood scoop. Following too closely to another vehicle in the rain could cause splashup to enter the scoop and cause hydrolock. Even if you go through a 6 inch deep puddle, water could easily roll up over the hood and into the scoop. It could happen and probably will happen to someone eventually. I bet that won't stop people from buying the car. Your car could also get hit by a meteor.
But were you rolling, did you have a manual tranny, and was the clutch out? If so, your drivetrain would still have enough momentum to mangle the engine even at idle.
The Z06 has a functional hood scoop. Following too closely to another vehicle in the rain could cause splashup to enter the scoop and cause hydrolock. Even if you go through a 6 inch deep puddle, water could easily roll up over the hood and into the scoop. It could happen and probably will happen to someone eventually. I bet that won't stop people from buying the car. Your car could also get hit by a meteor.
Mike
Apparently the Z06 scoope isn't functional.
Was going less than 5 mph puddle was less than 3 inchs deep. Front wheels caused a wake that spilled into the bottom feeder. Two rods broke along with two nice holes in block. Motor crackled once and smoke started coming out of hood seal, one frikken sick feeling. I wasn't the only one.
Jim Hall has the right Idea leave it in stock location. The hot air theory is BS and so is the ram air effect.
Was going less than 5 mph puddle was less than 3 inchs deep. Front wheels caused a wake that spilled into the bottom feeder. Two rods broke along with two nice holes in block. Motor crackled once and smoke started coming out of hood seal, one frikken sick feeling. I wasn't the only one.
Jim Hall has the right Idea leave it in stock location. The hot air theory is BS and so is the ram air effect.
my 1988 silverado takes cold air in from behind the headlight and there is a plastic oval shaped container in the engine compartment that conects this air inlet to the air cleaner and in that is a cone shapped baffle to keep out the water.
From: stafford country, va. Avatar: Me on turn 3 @ Bristol (The World's Fastest Half-Mile)
Originally Posted by jimman
The hot air theory is BS and so is the ram air effect.
is this a generalized statement or just one related to the current c6 intake configurations ? i thought a hotter intake charge was less efficient and ram air (if done correctly) can provide that little bit of extra oumph.
is this a generalized statement or just one related to the current c6 intake configurations ? i thought a hotter intake charge was less efficient and ram air (if done correctly) can provide that little bit of extra oumph.
"Ram Air" is effectively a myth at the speeds one would see in the 1/4 mile. At best you'd gain around 1 HP at around 130 MPH (as I recall from memory from calculations done in another thread.)
Actually, it is. There is a chamber in the nose which is not part of the engine compartment that the scoop's air feeds into, and from there it is sucked through the filter. The configuration is such as to prevent water ingestion.
Actually, it is. There is a chamber in the nose which is not part of the engine compartment that the scoop's air feeds into, and from there it is sucked through the filter. The configuration is such as to prevent water ingestion.
If air gets sucked through the scoop, how do you prevent ingestion of water through the same route? Do you have any specifics on the design?
Cooler, denser air has long been more able to make more power than warmer air...
I was looking around online and it seems that Corvette people are not the only ones with questions about the sealed boxes, open filters under the hood, and filters grabbing cold air from outside the engine compartment (HOT!)
Originally Posted by ECIS
With a filter on a stick setup in an M3, you'd probably lose power. The BMW engines I know generate a whole heap of heat in the engine bay. Hotter air temperature for air intake means less oxygen means less horsepower. The factory box is supposed to isolate the filter from engine heat while drawing cool air from the front kidney.
You'd get better air flow, but hotter air cancelling the benefit of the other. But you'd get the cool open air intake sound.
I wanted to get an intake for my car and was just going to put on a cone in place of all of the stock filter and tubing.
I was wondering how much hp that extra tube thing from DINAN actually helps vs. just adding a K&N Cone filter.
In the case of Dinan, they locate the filter NOT in the engine bay, but below it, isolated by a metal plate....Once you duct some additional fresh air to it, its not exposed to any of the hot engine air...When youve got to worry is when you just stick a cone to the end of your MAF. Then, all it can do is breathe hot engine air.
The water drops to the bottom of the chamber and drains out.
If the flow is slow enough, right? If you manage to scoop water onto your hood at speed, I don't think a column of water going 20-30 MPH is going to fall out the bottom. At speed, water will flow just like air. Sounds like there is probably still some risk in the Z06 setup. I don't think any type of "gravity separator" can really eliminate the risk of hydrolock. They only work for small amounts of water. To really reduce risk in that type of setup, you need a hood scoop operated via a solenoid that only opens when you are above say 50% throttle. Then you are fine unless you are ******* it through the puddles.
If the flow is slow enough, right? If you manage to scoop water onto your hood at speed, I don't think a column of water going 20-30 MPH is going to fall out the bottom. At speed, water will flow just like air.
No, it won't. Water only flows just like air when it's steam. When it's liquid it flows just like water. You would have to pretty much completely fill the filter with water in order to hydrolock the engine. With the C6 base and Z06's setup, this is highly unlikely. You'd need many inches of water on the ground to do it.
Sounds like there is probably still some risk in the Z06 setup.
There's some risk with all air-breathing engines. Obviously if you submerge the car, it'll ingest water. The Z06 has to pass all of the same tests that the base Corvette does.
I don't think any type of "gravity separator" can really eliminate the risk of hydrolock. They only work for small amounts of water.
The Z06's system works for a great deal of water. It'll easily withstand up to 4 inches of water on the ground (that's a lot.)
No, it won't. Water only flows just like air when it's steam.
Yes, it will. Fluid dynamics are identical for water and air as both water and air are considered "fluids" in the context of fluid dynamics and both follow the same flow equations. The only difference is resistance/density/viscocity. Water will have the same flow dynamics inside the intake as air, but where it gets complex is when you have a mix of both air and water. I'm not convinced that if you were riding behind a bus and it threw up a nice wall of water on your hood from hitting a puddle, the Z06 wouldn't hydrolock.
Also, the Z06 does not have to pass all safety tests that the base Corvette does. I've never seen anyone from GM claim that the Z06 is just as water resistant as the base model when it comes to water injestion. They may run the same tests but there are compromises made in any and every design. There is no way to know whether the Z06 can survive as much water as the base model based on the information we have right now.
Yes, it will. Fluid dynamics are identical for water and air as both water and air are considered "fluids" in the context of fluid dynamics and both follow the same flow equations. The only difference is resistance/density/viscocity. Water will have the same flow dynamics inside the intake as air, but where it gets complex is when you have a mix of both air and water. I'm not convinced that if you were riding behind a bus and it threw up a nice wall of water on your hood from hitting a puddle, the Z06 wouldn't hydrolock.
Also, the Z06 does not have to pass all safety tests that the base Corvette does. I've never seen anyone from GM claim that the Z06 is just as water resistant as the base model when it comes to water injestion. They may run the same tests but there are compromises made in any and every design. There is no way to know whether the Z06 can survive as much water as the base model based on the information we have right now.
Mike
Now you're just trying to argue for the sake of argument. No point in taking this further. :
Now you're just trying to argue for the sake of argument. No point in taking this further. :
On the contrary, it’s an important argument. It cost me and several others a ton of money because of this. The stock car goes through many tests where by the after market guys could care less about. With me it was 11.5K and change. There is a post in the C5,C6 registry about an event of hydrolock in Florida recently with a vortex. Now we can all turn our heads or we can get to the bottom of it. The suppliers should so warn and or pay up if it happens.
Correct. But not when rationality is thrown out of the window.
Liquid water does not flow the same as air. If it did, the ocean would blow away in the breeze. Liquid water is more dense, has a different viscosity, etc. than does air. Thus, it does not flow the same.
Correct. But not when rationality is thrown out of the window.
Liquid water does not flow the same as air. If it did, the ocean would blow away in the breeze. Liquid water is more dense, has a different viscosity, etc. than does air. Thus, it does not flow the same.
Obviously not a physics expert. Perhaps you should look into taking this course (it's the simplest one I could come up with).
The "type" of flow is the same. Only the resistance (and therefore flow rates, etc) are different.
You can go ahead and believe that everything flows the same. The rest of us know that some things flow one way and others, due to differences in density, state, viscosity, environment, etc, flow differently.
Fluid dynamics are identical, but their flow is not.
You can go ahead and believe that everything flows the same. The rest of us know that some things flow one way and others, due to differences in density, state, viscosity, environment, etc, flow differently.
Sounds good. And you can continue to believe that water will take some "magical path" that is completely different than water because gases and liquids are from different universes.