When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
When you tune using the LS2 edit and change the TM, does this deactivate the traction control and/or stability control?
I can only explain my situation...
I recently had my car tuned by Jeremy Formato. My mods are headers-back and a Halltech. As far as I know the TM has nothing directly to do with the TC or AH. What he did was change when my TM kicks in. Since there is no way to actually "turn it off", one must be creative- in short, the TM normally limits max torque to 281 lb/ft at 3000 rpm (I beleive)... what Jeremy did was change in to a limit of 6,000 lb/ft at 6,000 rpm... Will I ever make 6,000 lb/ft...? No. Therefore my TM will never come on. Trac and AH are still available at the push of a button.
I recently had my car tuned by Jeremy Formato. My mods are headers-back and a Halltech. As far as I know the TM has nothing directly to do with the TC or AH. What he did was change when my TM kicks in. Since there is no way to actually "turn it off", one must be creative- in short, the TM normally limits max torque to 281 lb/ft at 3000 rpm (I beleive)... what Jeremy did was change in to a limit of 6,000 lb/ft at 6,000 rpm... Will I ever make 6,000 lb/ft...? No. Therefore my TM will never come on. Trac and AH are still available at the push of a button.
Hope this answers your question.
...
But has the Active Handling algorithm been affected to some degree as a result of that. I haven’t seen a tuner that knows for sure. I had mine tuned and we just focused on mix, timing and rev limits.
But has the Active Handling algorithm been affected to some degree as a result of that. I haven’t seen a tuner that knows for sure. I had mine tuned and we just focused on mix, timing and rev limits.
Good point. I guess that in messing with that variable one must take the car to a parking lot and familiarize themselves with the new A/H limits that are then characteristic for the new tune
I was under the impression that TC/AH was determined by the input from wheel/spin sensors, accelerometer type sensors, and steering angle/yaw sensors (when it actually works). Remove a torque limiter from the engine algorythm which is based on torque output from the engine @ given RPM ranges, should have little to do with an external trigger to reduce power sent to the ECU from the ABS & BCM modules.
UNLESS these modules derive their engine power reductions from the TM table (as well as applying the brakes). Then again, from what folks have been able to decipher from the TM torque reduction, it doesn't seem similar to the near total cut of power that AH/TC induces when triggered (versus the somewhat "milder" effects of TM).
From: stafford country, va. Avatar: Me on turn 3 @ Bristol (The World's Fastest Half-Mile)
Originally Posted by SickRick
I was under the impression that TC/AH was determined by the input from wheel/spin sensors, accelerometer type sensors, and steering angle/yaw sensors (when it actually works). Remove a torque limiter from the engine algorythm which is based on torque output from the engine @ given RPM ranges, should have little to do with an external trigger to reduce power sent to the ECU from the ABS & BCM modules.
UNLESS these modules derive their engine power reductions from the TM table (as well as applying the brakes). Then again, from what folks have been able to decipher from the TM torque reduction, it doesn't seem similar to the near total cut of power that AH/TC induces when triggered (versus the somewhat "milder" effects of TM).
Hmmmm. Interesting concept...
Rick
I was under the impression that TM was defined as;
"(from GM Press Release) Marking the sixth generation of its legacy, the 2005 Chevrolet Corvette delivers more power, passion and precision to reach a new standard of performance car excellence. ...
... Traction control initiates individual wheel braking and/or engine torque reduction after sensing excessive wheelspin."
I was under the impression that TC/AH was determined by the input from wheel/spin sensors, accelerometer type sensors, and steering angle/yaw sensors (when it actually works). Remove a torque limiter from the engine algorythm which is based on torque output from the engine @ given RPM ranges, should have little to do with an external trigger to reduce power sent to the ECU from the ABS & BCM modules.
UNLESS these modules derive their engine power reductions from the TM table (as well as applying the brakes). Then again, from what folks have been able to decipher from the TM torque reduction, it doesn't seem similar to the near total cut of power that AH/TC induces when triggered (versus the somewhat "milder" effects of TM).
Hmmmm. Interesting concept...
Rick
I had a air stem replaced with a standard one do to a minor accident. It would not allow me to shut off active handling during that time. We were in the mountains and it just killed the performance in the twisties via pulling back on the thottle. Got to believe that the computer got involved with engine output during that mode. Before that I had no bog of engine before and after my tune. Again we did not get into any other computer parameters other than mix and timing. Also these edit programs where from, "We cracked the code" methods. With that in mind I'm sure after they "cracked the code" a whole text of application notes did not appear saying what to stay away from.
TC and AH are only going to come on when wheel slipage is detected to the best of my knowledge. I could be wrong. But that is the nature of the mode.
Jeremy
Sure but the computer I would think has to affect what happens when that occurs. Now it does so by controling engine parameters along with brakes and are those being tampered with a tune???
Jimman and Zig are commenting on just the aspect I was referring to. I know that brake controls are used for the traction control and active handling, but from what I have read so is TM. So my question still stands, does altering TM parameters change the overall funtion of TC and AH?
I also just remembered someone makes a plug in module to defeat TM, and they clearly stated that it disables ABS! So, what do you guys think?
Jimman and Zig are commenting on just the aspect I was referring to. I know that brake controls are used for the traction control and active handling, but from what I have read so is TM. So my question still stands, does altering TM parameters change the overall funtion of TC and AH?
I also just remembered someone makes a plug in module to defeat TM, and they clearly stated that it disables ABS! So, what do you guys think?
Big concern of mine and I stated in several posts that my sources say that there is NO TM in a manual tranmission. So what could be happening is that unknown to us we may be defeating parts of the AH.
While they may be related, I think they are 2 seperate modes because of how distinct their differences are. TM is an issue in drag race like situations, and of no concern on a tight twisty road. People describe TM as bogging and a reduction of power, and in some cases it is said to somewhat come and go smoothly, in that it does not upset the car, but reduces acceleration somewhat. In my experiences with AH, if I'm going straight at low speeds, and have the throttle mostly open, engine power is cut almost completely. When you're going 10mph with full throttle and the car doesn't accelerate or rev higher at all, it's very noticeable. AH doesn't do this arount curves, but those situations, which is what it was designed for, are at low throttle levels, where TM would not be needed.
That's my view of it, but weather the two work together at all we may never know.
[QUOTE=turbo_tom]I can only explain my situation...
I recently had my car tuned by Jeremy Formato. My mods are headers-back and a Halltech. As far as I know the TM has nothing directly to do with the TC or AH. What he did was change when my TM kicks in. Since there is no way to actually "turn it off", one must be creative- in short, the TM normally limits max torque to 281 lb/ft at 3000 rpm (I beleive)... what Jeremy did was change in to a limit of 6,000 lb/ft at 6,000 rpm... Will I ever make 6,000 lb/ft...? No. Therefore my TM will never come on. Trac and AH are still available at the push of a button.
Hope this answers your question.
I haven't seen LS2edit, but if you know how myself and a couple others (Ron Zimmer is another) certainly can completly eliminate torque management. Maybe they (Ls2edit) figured out how to do that yet. There is a lot more to it than just raising limits, which I have found to not totally get rid of it anyway. Only lessens it's effects.
I don't understand the 281lb-ft limit. Where is it measured? Obviously not at the flywheel or rear wheel. Otherwise these cars would be a lot slower.
I would like to see how they measure that also. I also ask the question on just how much torque this engine is capable of and I get no answer. My concern again, are they inadvertently messing with the handling data. I hear guess's but no printed design parameters. Cracking the code and reverse engineering isn't an answer.
I haven't seen LS2edit, but if you know how myself and a couple others (Ron Zimmer is another) certainly can completly eliminate torque management. Maybe they (Ls2edit) figured out how to do that yet. There is a lot more to it than just raising limits, which I have found to not totally get rid of it anyway. Only lessens it's effects.
Good luck, Ed
Raising it's limits will not totally get rid of it...? That's quite obvious, because theoretically, if I was to actually make more than 6,000 tq. under 6,000 rpm, it would turn on. But that will never happen- so for all intensive purposes, its off.
Raising it's limits will not totally get rid of it...? That's quite obvious, because theoretically, if I was to actually make more than 6,000 tq. under 6,000 rpm, it would turn on. But that will never happen- so for all intensive purposes, its off.
...
There is a little more to it than that, but belive what you want.