When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Don't the Z06's weigh less than the new C6's though? I don't know, I just always heard dispite the similar power ratings that the Z06's were quite a bit faster...
The Z06's are about 100 lbs lighter than the C6, the C6 has some torque management issues the Z06 did not have to contend with. The tune was good on the ZO6. My tune did not make near the numbers a lot have claimed on their C6. The C6 is an excellent package but will require some massaging in the right spots to really shine
The base/z51 corvettes arent meant a s a competition for the old Z06. Compare apples to apples. The new z51 compared to the old z51 is the change you should look at ....then compare the new z06 to your car.
The base/z51 corvettes arent meant a s a competition for the old Z06. Compare apples to apples. The new z51 compared to the old z51 is the change you should look at ....then compare the new z06 to your car.
I believe the original question centered on the difference in 5 HP between the two motors - the reality vs perception, not the platform. That's a legitimate question. As a soon to be C6 owner I'm very much interested in going forward not backward "performance" wise.
Folks are trying to figure out what the real world differences are between these two almost identically rated motors. This was a topic of great debate back in 97 between the LT4 rated at 330HP and the then new 345HP LS1. Folks back then weren't seeing much difference between the two motors and many LT4's actually showed more power on dyno's and even at the track. Hell I got my clock cleaned in my 99 MN6 by a bone stock 96 CE. So from my perspective the LT4 was a very "under rated" motor and most folks came to the conclusion that GM sent of the C4 with a "wringer" not wanting to cast a shadow on the next generation motor. Was this reality, urban legend or a vast right wing conspiracy - who knows, but to this day LT4's out perform many LS1's.
That's why I love the CF and have since 1999, we can have intelligent dialog w/o the ranker.
I believe the original question centered on the difference in 5 HP between the two motors - the reality vs perception, not the platform. That's a legitimate question. As a soon to be C6 owner I'm very much interested in going forward not backward "performance" wise.
Folks are trying to figure out what the real world differences are between these two almost identically rated motors. This was a topic of great debate back in 97 between the LT4 rated at 330HP and the then new 345HP LS1. Folks back then weren't seeing much difference between the two motors and many LT4's actually showed more power on dyno's and even at the track. Hell I got my clock cleaned in my 99 MN6 by a bone stock 96 CE. So from my perspective the LT4 was a very "under rated" motor and most folks came to the conclusion that GM sent of the C4 with a "wringer" not wanting to cast a shadow on the next generation motor. Was this reality, urban legend or a vast right wing conspiracy - who knows, but to this day LT4's out perform many LS1's.
That's why I love the CF and have since 1999, we can have intelligent dialog w/o the ranker.
Tom
I believe the area under the torque curve is higher on the C6 but not as a peak probably do to the cam. I've matched up with two Z06's an 03 and an 04 and got both by a car lenght on a 20 to 70 rolling start.
I believe the area under the torque curve is higher on the C6 but not as a peak probably do to the cam. I've matched up with two Z06's an 03 and an 04 and got both by a car lenght on a 20 to 70 rolling start.
Maybe they were clueless as to how to drive? 02-04 Z's have run 11.9's@117 Bone stock. I havent seen or heard of anything anywhere near that from the new C6's. Not trying to be argumentative, It's just up until now I have heard numerous accounts of Z06's trouncing the new C6 both on the street and track.
Maybe they were clueless as to how to drive? 02-04 Z's have run 11.9's@117 Bone stock. I havent seen or heard of anything anywhere near that from the new C6's. Not trying to be argumentative, It's just up until now I have heard numerous accounts of Z06's trouncing the new C6 both on the street and track.
Hey it called a learning curve, do you think the zo6's were that fast right out of the get go. I don't think so, I had a new Z28 camaro in 2002 and I spent a lot of time on the track with it and I would see those new Z06 owners show up all puffed up and strutting around till about the second pass and then they would just quietly put their stuff away and go home. It was quite a while before you started to see the faster cars. And yes you are right when you get your 2001 Z06 if you are not a top notch driver a good well driven C6 is going to ruin your day.
Wow you must have nearly gotten in the 11's kickin all that Z06 butt. Is your C6 stock? What kind of 60' times were you guy's puttin down? How about the ET's and trap speeds.
The 60' times were nothing special, 2.0's Track is an 1/8 mile track. Traps for me were right at 90mph with a best time of 8.419. Of the four Z's that were there, 2 of them couldn't get past 8.7's and I attribute that to not very good drivers.
Of the two that were worthy, they couldn't get out of the mid 8.5's and they ran a lot. We all had great launches.
The track is at 1200 ft. Doing the math based on another time slip I saw here the factor for a C6 was 1.51. Adjust for altitude and it comes out to about a 12.55 qtr mi time.
Nothing special there either. With stock Z's typically running 12.7 +/- a few tenths, it is right on.
The only mod on my car is K&N filters and I really don't think they are doing crap.
The track is real addictive for sure. Can't wait for the cooler weather.
Cool, deal. Sounds like the C6's have a lot more potential than most of what i have heard. I for one really like them. I do think they look a little lifted from the factory but when lowered they look awesome. I am trying to talk my cousin into buying one. he wanted a Porsche 911 (non-turbo) but I told him to buy a C6 or 04 Z06. Anyhow, congrats on the strong runs.