Displacement...
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 3
From: Warrenton VA
Displacement...
Ok I know the LS2 is a 6.0 I always thought in cubic inches it was a 402... Am I wrong? If I am right then why does Lingenfelter sell a 366 motor why go smaller?
Race Director
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,549
Likes: 27
From: Southampton NJ
Originally Posted by Jstyle
Ok I know the LS2 is a 6.0 I always thought in cubic inches it was a 402... Am I wrong? If I am right then why does Lingenfelter sell a 366 motor why go smaller?
Race Director
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 25
From: Austin Texas
The LS2 is a 364 cubic inch displacement. Do the math; 101.6mm bore X 92mm stroke =5.97Liter OR; 4" bore X 3.62" stroke = 364 cu. in.
The "6.0L" label from GM is their usual rounding up, just like the LS1 was actually 346 cubic inches rounded up to 350.
The "6.0L" label from GM is their usual rounding up, just like the LS1 was actually 346 cubic inches rounded up to 350.
Last edited by haljensen; May 11, 2006 at 11:31 AM.
