When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Come on fellows look at his sixty foot time. That is his problem not wx, and probably not his tires either. Usually no tread on tires does not have much effect on a preped track. I ran a 1.83 sixty in a basically stock C5 on bald runcraps.
You need to get your sixty down to 2.0x's. You can do that with a C6 in almost any wx condition. Weather and DA are not your problem, your launch is.
Good luck, read rangers hints on launching the C5 Z06.
Trapping 109, with a 2.00 sixty you will be running 12.8 - 12.9.
Work on the launch. M6's require practice to launch properly.
Thanks, I know I was pretty unhappy with the 60'. I came from the AWD of 1.7XX 60's on stock tires.
Thanks, I know I was pretty unhappy with the 60'. I came from the AWD of 1.7XX 60's on stock tires.
Without any TM and DR's 1.7's are possible with the C6. I had a C5 with just vararam, catback, and tune run in the high 1.7's. I was not the driver at the time but it ran it. Oh and by the way that was on stock runflats but it was a very cool, dry night.
Without any TM and DR's 1.7's are possible with the C6. I had a C5 with just vararam, catback, and tune run in the high 1.7's. I was not the driver at the time but it ran it. Oh and by the way that was on stock runflats but it was a very cool, dry night.
You need to come to St Louis and try to pilot the C6!
Thanks, I will continue to practice...but the comment on the coolant temps/ heat soak/ intake air temps all makes sense too.
DA takes into the weather condition and the track elevation. c6 could run as fast as 12.5 @ 115mph (some even reported as low as 12.2) and that same car could also run like yours did on a different track / weather condition. to give you an example last time i ran, it was 96 degrees, my DA was around 4600 feet that is with the track elevation at only 1250 ft.
You have to be a MADMAN to run with 96 degrees ambient temperature. You could cook hot dogs on your car's hood!
i think you might have just found your problem, if you were making your run at temp as high as 210 that could have been timing pull. my friend with stock stat dyno his car twice with only 10 minutes cool down, and on the 2nd pull lost 18hp or so. put in a cooler stat, allow enough cooling down time and try to make your run around 180 degrees or so, that should help. and turn tc/ah off too. that could have rub you some mph.
You have to be a MADMAN to run with 96 degrees ambient temperature. You could cook hot dogs on your car's hood!
I love drag racing, but once the summertime hits I don't even bother going to the track. I don't even like to run when it's above 60 degrees! Up here in Ontario we're getting right into the good part of the racing season now. My favorite track is open until the end of November, and there will be tons of opportunities to race in some wicked cold air between now and then. I've been to the track some days when they have to delay opening the track while they heat up the water that has frozen solid in the burnout box.
I ran a best of 8.9@81.9 (2.1) with cat-back in a bit worse weather conditions (2500' DA). That was with a slight cool down and coolant temps about 195. Any hotter and times would go down. I ran about 15 passes and never bettered that. It took a tune and TM removal to get beyond that. After I ran a best of 8.7@86.4 (2.1 & 2100' DA). I have yet to master Rangers techniques but working on it.
hi bunk22, after seeing your posted # for a few times now, i just have to ask, please don't take this the wrong way, it isn't an attack on you or your car. i find the 81.9mph trap speed really low for 1/8 miles. when i had just the magaflow muffler and k&n my best run was
I have an 05 Z51 manual, only mod is GHL exhaust. I ran a best of 13.11 at 113 mph with a crappy 2.2 60 foot. I am having a hard time launching the car smoothly. It was 85 degrees with 90% humidity, Florida at sea level. I plan to try again when the weather cools off. Everybody is right, the launch is the key.
Did I miss something? Do we even know if this is an automatic or six speed manual car?
The 210 is high, but not THAT high of a temp. I have not seen that big of a difference when mine was at that temp. Also, 60' times usually have a minimal (if any) effect on trap speed.
No matter how you slice it and dice it, these C6s, on average, are just slow. My first time ever down a race track with a very slightly modded C5 6-sp gave me a poor 0-60ft. (2.3 sec.) but the car still ran a 12.9 at 112mph. I just think that these LS2 engines, are for the most part, overrated at 400hp.
No matter how you slice it and dice it. This is a slow time. My first time ever down a race track with a very slightly modded C5 6-sp gave me a poor 0-60ft. (2.3 sec.) but the car still ran a 12.9 at 112mph. I just think that these LS2 engines, are for the most part, overrated at 400hp.
If its a manual car, then I agree that it is slow. If an automatic, then it's really not.
I dissagree with you on the car being overrated. I've run two C6's at the track. My first had 900 miles on it, and I turned a 12.5 at 115. That would indicate that 400 horses are all accounted for, don't you think? What other 400 hp car runs those numbers?
My first had 900 miles on it, and I turned a 12.5 at 115. That would indicate that 400 horses are all accounted for, don't you think? What other 400 hp car runs those numbers?
400hp + 3450ish pound (with driver of course) + sea level + good weather + no timing retard / good iat / good coolant temp + good driver + good track = 115ish mph to me....nice run jschindler.
400hp + 3450ish pound (with driver of course) + sea level + good weather + no timing retard / good iat / good coolant temp + good driver + good track = 115ish mph to me....nice run jschindler.
Thanks. BTW, I'm into motorcycles as well (see sig). I even did some roadracing back "in the day" (early and mid '80s).
If its a manual car, then I agree that it is slow. If an automatic, then it's really not.
I dissagree with you on the car being overrated. I've run two C6's at the track. My first had 900 miles on it, and I turned a 12.5 at 115. That would indicate that 400 horses are all accounted for, don't you think? What other 400 hp car runs those numbers?
As I said in my post "for the most part", meaning on average. Your times are the exception to the rule.
As I said in my post "for the most part", meaning on average. Your times are the exception to the rule.
the reason "for the most part" these c6 are not running 115 mph as GM has advistised is at least one of the elements in this equation is missing / not right. everything has to just right or you will not see the c6 protential
Originally Posted by cbrf4i1
400hp + 3450ish pound (with driver of course) + sea level + good weather + no timing retard / good iat / good coolant temp + good driver + good track = 115ish mph.
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
St. Jude donor in memory of jpee '14
Originally Posted by MJU1983
It is a manual car, now I am getting worried! lol
Practice, practice & more practice. You are used to your AWD drive car and now you have a Corvette. With a little more seat time your times will improve. Good luck
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.