When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
If you hydrolock your engine because of a vararam intake you can bet you a$$ it will not be covered under warranty. That is if the person would be dumb enough to let the vararam stay on the car when he took it in for the warranty service.
I have had three vararams now on three vettes. No problems, but I don't drive in rain. Personally I would not put one on a daily driver.
This is the conclusion I came to. I just can't afford the risk, no matter how small because it's my daily driver. When we get thunderstorms in Arizona it can fill the streets with water. A lot of our older roads are not designed properly. I went to College in Tucson and the daily newspaper once ran a photo on the cover that showed a guy water skiing behind a Jeep in the middle of a flooded street!
Yep you hydro lock your car with a Varam installed you won't be covered by warrenty. Of course if you hydrolock you car stock it is unlikey that you will be covered either. You would have to run through a pretty deep puddle, more like a lake to do it stock. Car was not designed as a sub.
Oh and by the way mine is a daily driver. So far this month we have recieve over 8 inchs of ran.
Yep you hydro lock your car with a Varam installed you won't be covered by warrenty. Of course if you hydrolock you car stock it is unlikey that you will be covered either. You would have to run through a pretty deep puddle, more like a lake to do it stock. Car was not designed as a sub.
Oh and by the way mine is a daily driver. So far this month we have recieve over 8 inchs of ran.
I agree that the chances are low that you will ever hydrolock. My point is it's not the rain, it's the standing water we get here because of the crappy streets. One more thing, I would always be extremely nervous everytime it rained here if I had the Vararam. I'm too old for that additional stress!
I agree that the chances are low that you will ever hydrolock. My point is it's not the rain, it's the standing water we get here because of the crappy streets. One more thing, I would always be extremely nervous everytime it rained here if I had the Vararam. I'm too old for that additional stress!
Yep, thats exactly what I'm saying, with the rain building up on these roads, it really would make me very nervous.
Of course if you hydrolock you car stock it is unlikey that you will be covered either. You would have to run through a pretty deep puddle, more like a lake to do it stock. Car was not designed as a sub.
Oh and by the way mine is a daily driver. So far this month we have recieve over 8 inchs of ran.
Why they would not cover hydrolock on a stock vehicle? I agree it probably will not happen, but if it did, it should be covered under the warranty.
My dealer would cover it or they would have a fat retired guy hanging out in the showroom for a month.
I would be willing to bet the only way you could hydrolock a stock setup is to submerge the front end of the car. That would not be covered by warrenty but by you insurance company.
Just to give you an idea of how deep a puddle we are taking about here to just get water to the bottom lip of the intake you would need a 9 inch deep puddle or a bow wave the same. To completely cover the intake you need 14 inches. For water to get into the intake it as to rise to 25 inches.
I am a firm believer that unless you submerge the whole opening of the vararam they is no way for this to occur.
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16
St. Jude donor in memory of jpee '14
I had finally decided to install the honker that has been sitting in my garage since August 05 and now you guys are once again reminding me that my car can become a submarine
As bad as I want to put the Vararam on my car, I am too worried about hydrolocking. In Florida, you can leave your house in clear and sunny skies. You can go a couple miles down the road and find yourself in a severe rainstorm. It rains so hard that all you can see is the tail lights of the car in front of you (if you are lucky). I have gone crashing through some deep puddles and been hit by the wake of deep puddles from cars in the opposite lane. I do not think the Vararam system is all that safe to use in Florida. If you take a day trip in Florida, you always run the risk of getting caught in a heavy downpour.
Well just thought I would post about the subject. Living here in the Northwest we tend to get a little rain. Nothing heavy like in the southwest with flash floods and all just steady all the time.
Anyway it seems that China didn't want to get hit by a typhon so they sent all the rain to us. In the 40 years or so I have lived here I have never seen this much rain for this long and we have 60 deg temps in November.
From Bend Oregon to Everett, Wa. it rained the whole trip, about 300 miles. Most of the time heavy but always constant. It was dark and you could not see any puddles, none deep though. Cars in the adjacant lanes where spraying the car good. Hydroplaning at its finest.
Anyway the Vararam performed perfectly. If there was going to be any problems it would of been in this storm. I think as long as you don't play U-Boat commander this bottom breather is the best.
I also live in the Northwest. (Hillsboro, OR) So far, in this November alone we have received >12" of rain (~one third of our ANNUAL average). I have a VaraRam on my C5 and I must admit I was a little freaked out driving in it. The very heavy downpours didn't bother it a all BUT, I did not drive through any deep puddles either. Nor would I do it with any other vehicle.
well thats my main issue here, you can't avoid big puddles as all the roads flood. Although I would assume you'd really need to submerge the car for it to hydro lock. I suppose you could also drill a couple of holes in the vararam so that water would drop out instead of flowing right into the engine.
I have a vararam. I don't drive in the rain. When you have your intake facing forward that low to the ground it is wishful thinking to say it has no possibility of hydro lock.
It's standing water at slow speed, front wheels cause wake that rises up over filter.
Again that wake would have to be 9 inches high to just get to the bottom of the open. 14 inches to cover the whole thing. And that is the only possible way to hydro lock the engine IMO.
just takes one shot of water, as in good size spash under high vacuum.
lol, did you read the first post. Don't think spray from other cars think of a garden hose set on stream, that was the size of the splashes.
The only way to create a vacuum is if you cover the whole opening of the intake 5x10 inches. Otherwise considering that water is 100 times heavier than air the air will displace the water. The water will follow the path of least resistance and that is back out through the opening. In addition you would have to injest enough water for it to maintain a seal through the entire intake. Considering the volume of the intake at the filter is much larger than the opening itself that would be alot of water.
I imagine that someone could figure out just what it would take. But considering that I drove 300 miles home in a rain storm that dropped 12 inches of rain in about 12 hours I'm pretty sure that unless you are a U-boat commander there is nothing to worry about.
FYI almost everywhere in Washington we have doubled our normal rain totals, broken every record out there and still have 10 days to go.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.