Best Cam for these Modifications:

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 15, 2007 | 09:55 PM

TTU

Thread Starter

Pro

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 587

Likes: 0

From: Lubbock Tx

Best Cam for these Modifications:

Any recommendations for the best cam for these particular mods on my 2007 C6. It is basically my weekend car and I do not drive it on a daily basis:

Vararam CAI
Kooks LT headers (3/4)
Kooks high-flow cats
Corsa Sport Cat-back exhaust
B&M shifter

Any comments and insights are greatly appreciated.

Feb 15, 2007 | 11:09 PM

1bdasvt

Le Mans Master

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 7,838

Likes: 1

From: Valencia '32 Ford 3 window with 615 HP!!!!

St. Jude Donor '06-'09

Talk to Dan at Livernois!!

Feb 15, 2007 | 11:46 PM

glennhl

Le Mans Master

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 5,762

Likes: 4

From: Chandler Arizona

Quote:

Originally Posted by TTU

Go with an agressive cam if you stick with stock heads, you could run a sleeper cam if you put on some aftermarket heads.

Feb 16, 2007 | 03:08 AM

Nicspaul

Heel & Toe

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 23

Likes: 0

From: Indianapolis IN

Wouldnt you want a stealthy cam with stock heads, or an aggressive cam with aftermarket heads? I was planning on doing stealthy cam on stock heads...bad idea?

Feb 16, 2007 | 09:04 AM

5 Liter Eater

Le Mans Master

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 8,472

Likes: 38

From: Houston TX

St. Jude Donor '11

Those are all good mods but none of them really play a part in going with one grind over another. It's depends more on your goals at this point. Peak HP, torque monster, area under the curve, stock idle, wild idle, etc.

Feb 16, 2007 | 09:47 AM

0Dave@LivernoisDSS

Former Vendor

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 115

Likes: 0

From: Dearborn Heights Michigan

Our Stage 1 or 2 cam would work very well.

Feb 16, 2007 | 09:54 AM

glennhl

Le Mans Master

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 5,762

Likes: 4

From: Chandler Arizona

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicspaul

Wouldnt you want a stealthy cam with stock heads, or an aggressive cam with aftermarket heads? I was planning on doing stealthy cam on stock heads...bad idea?

The current thinking by most hot rodders is that if you have an aftermarket head that flows really good, you really don't need a wild cam. However, if you stick with the stock heads then you can benefit more from going to a more aggressive cam.

Feb 16, 2007 | 12:33 PM

SpinMonster

Tech Contributor

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 12,093

Likes: 197

From: Colorado Springs, CO

St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nicspaul

Wouldnt you want a stealthy cam with stock heads, or an aggressive cam with aftermarket heads? I was planning on doing stealthy cam on stock heads...bad idea?

With a texas speed torquer2 you will get 435 rwhp with the stock heads and your mods. If you go with heads and want optimum compression you may need to flycut if you go as big as a 232 cam. A 228/232 and 8.7 dcr is the biggest that fits without flycutting. Andy at A&A stocks that cam. Works well with etp and trick flows. Keep in mind that some heads with different valve angles will allow bigger cams. The ETP have an 11degree angle and the TF's have a 13.5 allowing a 236 cam with the use of the TF's and bigger with the ETP's. Afr's and all 243 options are limited as I have already noted.

Why the myth that stock heads require a wimp cam is beyond me. Any cam that works with heads will be better than a smaller cam in the stock displacement 6 liter. No, a small stealth cam will not be better than a 232 or even a 236 cam with stock heads.

Last edited by SpinMonster; Feb 17, 2007 at 11:25 AM.