Please make an LS3 section




Last edited by SpinMonster; Jul 14, 2007 at 02:40 AM.
The new engine and transmission and other changes might not completely justify a new section, but splitting the C6 section would benefit almost all Forum Members.
The pre 2008 owners could happily continue to tell themselves the 2008 changes are nothing special, freely discuss the ugliness of the new wheels and comment about how the new colors either stink or are "girly". While, the 2008 and post 2008 owners could enjoy their new cars and trade information in relative peace.
You will not need a 2009 or 2010 section because GM will not change the drive train or make other significant changes in the car until the C7 is introduced as a 2012 model year.
Maybe we could also design our own Z51 badges and work on a 2008 secret handshake?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
This is of course a very selfish, self serving thing and suggested ONLY to aid me/my car in maintaining a top spot on some list LOL.

But in all seriousness, I ultimately do NOT think the board should make a whole new separate section, I think EVERY person posting should just be extra careful/meticulous/detail oriented when posting and specify right in their titles whether their topic/question/complaint/praise is LS3 or LS2 related.

Problem solved.




When actual posts like LG's LS3 testing and R&D come up they provide real tech info (although it is limited to how a secret spec cam works in the motor and nothing about a possible cam profile you can grind yourself---in other words you cant build on the research---but he pays to advertise here just like other tuners such as Cartek also with secret cam specs) and people may one day use that info for modding.
Take the predictions based on nothing to the general discussion section before this becomes like the LS2 section at LS1tech.com where 80% of the posts are people asking for predictions and cam suggestions for L92 heads on 403/416 strokers. Try and do a search there on a head cam package for an LS2. There arent any.





Problem solved.

In additon I think the posters should also use the appropriate section for posts. General section for posts that dont improve performance and to discuss possibilities. Tech for actual performance and actual mods....not predictions of such.
You sir, are a genious.
This is of course a very selfish, self serving thing and suggested ONLY to aid me/my car in maintaining a top spot on some list LOL.

But in all seriousness, I ultimately do NOT think the board should make a whole new separate section, I think EVERY person posting should just be extra careful/meticulous/detail oriented when posting and specify right in their titles whether their topic/question/complaint/praise is LS3 or LS2 related.

Problem solved.

LS2 owners to LS3 owners here has to at least be around 100 :1 if not considerably more.
Really though, how many of the LS3 guys are going to be talking about the technical aspects of the engine and driveline? Probably not many.
A lot of these LS3 guys I've seen here so far are either new Vette owners announcing the purchase of their cars, and who tend not to tinker, or guys who are multiple Vette owners who don't modifiy their cars or get very technical much anyway.
So you'll have a section with maybe half dozen regular posters in it, and days, even weeks going by before any posts are made in the section. You wind up with a section with a few very old posts in it.
You wind up with threads that are ancient, with one or two responses, and many with no responses in them, much like some of the lesser Corvette forums on the internet.
Notice how slow the tuning section and FI sections of the C6 forum are.
As said before, a lot of the LS3/TR6060 guys may not be into the technical aspects of the car and since the rest of the car is essentially more of what we saw in the prior year models, most, if not all, of their needs should be met in the existing sections.
Someone's seat rocks, or active handling light comes on, or rear end makes noises, or battery dies, or air conditioner doesn't cool, or front signal light bulb blows, ......well we don't need a seperate LS3 section for that.
Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; Jul 14, 2007 at 12:56 PM.




It took 6 months to get past warranty worry posts on the C6 when it came out. With the 2005's only now comming off warranty, it shouldnt take long to see more mods done since the cars are now in the reach of used car/younger purchasers.
The 2008's have a 5yr 100k warranty so it will never end.
Generation IV Internal Engine
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=80
Generation IV External Engine
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=130
Generation IV Internal Engine
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=80
Generation IV External Engine
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=130
Generation IV Internal Engine
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=80
Generation IV External Engine
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=130
100% Much larger knowledge based from motor builders, tuners and manufacturers.If you have a question about LSx engines and can't find the answer over there, then you probably won't find it anywhere else on the net, anyway.
It took 6 months to get past warranty worry posts on the C6 when it came out. With the 2005's only now comming off warranty, it shouldnt take long to see more mods done since the cars are now in the reach of used car/younger purchasers.
The 2008's have a 5yr 100k warranty so it will never end.
Indeed there are still, even to this day, a lot of warranty worry posts among the pre '08 crowd.
So if you take that into account, you'll probably see an even less number of "technically or mod oriented" LS3 posts than I was initially figuring on.
In additon I think the posters should also use the appropriate section for posts. General section for posts that dont improve performance and to discuss possibilities. Tech for actual performance and actual mods....not predictions of such.
You sir, are a genious.
Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; Jul 14, 2007 at 04:18 PM.













