Ls3 Baseline and Header Dyno numbers!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 3, 2007 | 02:45 AM

#41

Robert@Advanced Dyno

Thread Starter

Melting Slicks

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 2,236

Likes: 0

From: Suisun City Ca

Quote:

Originally Posted by srpbaer

Very nice indeed...just one slight problem...you say 27 hp gain but my math comes up with 21 HP gain???? before was 389 and after was 410...help me out this this...again great job!!!

If you look at it again it actually reads "27 rwp gain @ 5600 rpm" So that is the gain at that given RPM! Alot of people only know how to read a dynochart and its peak Gains which you can hardly feel. It is the gains below 6k that put you in your seat!
It is just a number that I threw out there so that people could see the gains at other rpms as well

Nov 3, 2007 | 03:38 AM

#42

jbsblownc5

Race Director

Joined: Nov 2000

Posts: 11,221

Likes: 899

From: CA

2017 C5 of the Year Finalist

St. Jude Donor '08

Quote:

Originally Posted by '06 Quicksilver Z06

Its not 455 at the rear wheels like one of the others,

but still great numbers.

That's because it was not done with the same headers, catback, intake or tuned on 95+ octane. My car was also tuned with a load dyno, that allows the tuner to really dial it in!

You need to let this go quick, you'll be contacted further about this shortly!

MOVE ON...

Back on topic, very nice #s, and good gain under the curve!!!

Nov 5, 2007 | 03:52 PM

#43

04_Z06_CE

Safety Car

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 3,717

Likes: 2

From: Westlake Village, Ca

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbsblownc5

MOVE ON...

Back on topic, very nice #s, and good gain under the curve!!!

Remember JB , there is no answer for stupidity and jealousy....

Nov 12, 2007 | 10:08 PM

#44

Jimmyz28

Drifting

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,320

Likes: 45

From: Atlanta, GA.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jschindler

Six hp at the crank. Under the new SAE certified standards, GM can't fudge the numbers. It's real.

(no offense) I'm not buying this for one minute. And in addition, NFW it's worth the $1400 one has to pay for it IMHO.

Nov 13, 2007 | 12:35 AM

#45

BlownV6

Drifting

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 1,937

Likes: 1

From: Tempe Az

Quote:

Originally Posted by e weezie

Wow, highest stock numbers i've seen without NPP!

I pulled 391 with the MN6 and no NPP

Nov 13, 2007 | 12:38 AM

#46

11secondGP

Burning Brakes

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 1,029

Likes: 0

From: The best one

Quote:

NFW it's worth the $1400 one has to pay for it IMHO

NPP is the best option I got on the car! I find myself switching back and forth every 5-10 minutes. Every car should have a flap system, its the best of both worlds.

Robert check your PMs!!!

Nov 14, 2007 | 04:00 PM

#47

mblock66

Instructor

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 135

Likes: 0

From: Whitehouse Station NJ

The torco is what is really increasing the power up to that 455 figure. In the subaru world we are seeing 20-30 AWHP from mixing a 32 oz can into a tank of gas on a tuned car. That is a little 2.5 L 4 banger. Yes you can run more timing and boost on 97 octane mix but I assume the same would be the same for an LS3 (minus the boost) but since the engine is so much bigger and more powerful I would think 30 whp is easily achieved by a tuner that can use 97 oct fuel.

Im the import world octane is king. On 104 octane these cars put down like 80 whp more, its insane. We recently tuned a GT30r turboed Legacy GT to over 400 awhp on a torco tune. It should run mid 11's easy. stuff is amazing

Last edited by mblock66; Nov 14, 2007 at 04:03 PM.

Nov 15, 2007 | 08:58 AM

#48

11sec_lx

Advanced

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 93

Likes: 0

Not to hijack but...

I used 80oz of Accelerator per tank on my Whipple'd 04' Cobra on 24lbs of boost. It made a little over 605 rwhp (SAE) - 636 rwtq (SAE) on a soft tune.

Great stuff!