When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What lift are they good too???? I'm putting on a set of Harland Sharp 1.8 Rockers and was considering upgrading the springs if they can't handle the .554 lift that I will be getting. I've been told that the stock springs can handle up to .580 Is that true????
I've heard that, too. I have the Comp Cams 1.85 roller rockers that I have not installed just yet and was told they would be no problem. However, if you change the cam later on, then I think they will be a problem.
What lift are they good too???? I'm putting on a set of Harland Sharp 1.8 Rockers and was considering upgrading the springs if they can't handle the .554 lift that I will be getting. I've been told that the stock springs can handle up to .580 Is that true????
I just helped my buddy put them on his LS2 GTO. We took it to the tuner after we were done, and could not get engine passed 6350 RPM, due to valve float. I think the springs he ordered were from Comp Cams, but they were changing the design of the spring. He just got them a few days ago, after a 7 week wait. He has a stock cam.
I just helped my buddy put them on his LS2 GTO. We took it to the tuner after we were done, and could not get engine passed 6350 RPM, due to valve float. I think the springs he ordered were from Comp Cams, but they were changing the design of the spring. He just got them a few days ago, after a 7 week wait. He has a stock cam.
I've been running 1.85 SLP rockers in my 05 with the stock LS2 springs and cam for a few years now. No issues at all, and no float on the dyno. That said, I don't know anything about the Harland rockers, but I do know that weight is everything when it comes to valvetrains. The SLP design is very light at the stem since there's no heavy steel roller hanging there, and that works well with a beehive spring.
Lots on this forum will disagree, but I prefer the lightest valvetrain components and beehive springs much more than heavy parts and heavy double springs with heavy pressure to compensate. To each his own.
The Harland Sharps are just to heavy at the tip (46grams if I remember right)for the stock valvesprings.I got float at exactly 6000rpm on my LS2. They felt great up until then though,very noticable difference. I took them off and immediately felt the loss. Then I put on the LS7 1.8 rockers (4.5 grams at the tip) and got all the power back and no float. SLP 1.85(the stock looking ones,not the roller tip)might be at the edge of what the stock springs can handle lift wise but the weight would be fine plus you can't tell the difference between them and stock.
I've been running 1.85 SLP rockers in my 05 with the stock LS2 springs and cam for a few years now. No issues at all, and no float on the dyno. That said, I don't know anything about the Harland rockers, but I do know that weight is everything when it comes to valvetrains. The SLP design is very light at the stem since there's no heavy steel roller hanging there, and that works well with a beehive spring.
Lots on this forum will disagree, but I prefer the lightest valvetrain components and beehive springs much more than heavy parts and heavy double springs with heavy pressure to compensate. To each his own.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.