Why are "Coil Overs" Better ?


Why? What are the benefits of coil overs?
Thanks!
Rob
A good set of coilovers with stiff spring rates, coupled with some good sway bars just stiffens & lowers the car & equates to having a stiffer, stouter car both laterally, as well as fore to aft. The best coilovers for multi-purpose usage are remote reservoir adjustable. This gives you the option to adjust compression from a remote canister to dial it in depending on track conditions or location or application (ie. autocross, track, drag.) The rebound can generally be adjusted on the shock itself. Callaway/Eibach has a package that is intended to be used with the stock leaves, but the coilover springs can be upgraded, allowing removal of the leaves. Penske makes a sick shock package, that couples well with Hyperco coilover springs. My personal opinion is that if coilovers don't have the remote rese, they're a waste of $$. I have the Eibachs with 600/800lb springs front/back. Stock Z51 spring rates are approx 575/750. I've used my car for everything. When I go to the track, I just crank up the front & dial the rears to full soft & boom, full weight transfer. Track calls for about 3-4 on the front & rear & then tinker with tire pressures some. Coilovers will allow you to pull noticeably more later force when cornering at high speed & adjustable ones allow you to self-tune your suspension to suit whatever type of driving/racing you're doing. All of the above is referencing only double adjustable coilovers. There are also triples which allow more adjustability & are usually reserved for track only race applications. Hope that helps!
Blue Bomber
A good set of coilovers with stiff spring rates, coupled with some good sway bars just stiffens & lowers the car & equates to having a stiffer, stouter car both laterally, as well as fore to aft. The best coilovers for multi-purpose usage are remote reservoir adjustable. This gives you the option to adjust compression from a remote canister to dial it in depending on track conditions or location or application (ie. autocross, track, drag.) The rebound can generally be adjusted on the shock itself. Callaway/Eibach has a package that is intended to be used with the stock leaves, but the coilover springs can be upgraded, allowing removal of the leaves. Penske makes a sick shock package, that couples well with Hyperco coilover springs. My personal opinion is that if coilovers don't have the remote rese, they're a waste of $$. I have the Eibachs with 600/800lb springs front/back. Stock Z51 spring rates are approx 575/750. I've used my car for everything. When I go to the track, I just crank up the front & dial the rears to full soft & boom, full weight transfer. Track calls for about 3-4 on the front & rear & then tinker with tire pressures some. Coilovers will allow you to pull noticeably more later force when cornering at high speed & adjustable ones allow you to self-tune your suspension to suit whatever type of driving/racing you're doing. All of the above is referencing only double adjustable coilovers. There are also triples which allow more adjustability & are usually reserved for track only race applications. Hope that helps!
Blue Bomber
Blue bomber,
I hope you don't take this the wrong way. But how many cars have you setup up before??? Shock spring and valving can be a tricky thing to get right. Not for the average guy. I would take the other side on this one. A triple adjustable shock in the wrong hands is a huge waste of money, a double adjustable a lot of waste, and single well why anyways.
Fixed valving coilovers are a good thing for 90 percent of the guys. The other 10 percent that can make faster lap times with shocks go for it.
Back on track,
WHY are coilovers better, here is a good thread all about it. I get a little down right mad about this subject. I just feel very strong about this agruement.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1918713
Randy
www.dougrippie.com
I'm sure the potential (I say 'potential' because if the wrong parts are chosen and/or the set up is wrong the results could be a car that handles worse than the comparable leaf spring car) gains can offset the extra weight though.


Just my .02
John
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
A side benefit of the swap that you did is that you can now easily tune your 4 corners weights, and shock valving which you can't do w/the stock parts.
Blue Bomber
I'm sure the potential (I say 'potential' because if the wrong parts are chosen and/or the set up is wrong the results could be a car that handles worse than the comparable leaf spring car) gains can offset the extra weight though.


Building an all-out race car for multiple tracks? Go coilovers for the ability to change spring rates.
Street car with the occasional track day? You're all ready set.


I am well aware that all cars - even 'performance cars' - are a collection of compromises. Even so, I'm one who actually believes that the engineers who designed the C6 chose well, the resulting 'compromise' that we know as the C6 Corvette is actually a quite capable road car... even occasionally maybe a 'race car.'
Further, I believe that I, for one, probably lack the 'engineering skill' and even the 'driving skill' to be able to successfully adjust suspension components (coil overs and all!). In other words, I think that the 'average Joe' can realy mess up a car's handling by inept and uneducated 'fidling.'
Again, I really appreciate the expertise and comments of you who responded.
Rob
It's still snowing a little at my house. 60s one day, 10 inches of snow the next
Randy
Blue Bomber

Dude I didn't mean to insult you at all. But after a car's valving is right, there isn't too much change needed. That was my point. I personally have seen more harm done then good when the wrong people get trick shocks. We have a lot of fast cars running fixed rate shocks, under all sorts of conditions.
Randy
I am well aware that all cars - even 'performance cars' - are a collection of compromises. Even so, I'm one who actually believes that the engineers who designed the C6 chose well, the resulting 'compromise' that we know as the C6 Corvette is actually a quite capable road car... even occasionally maybe a 'race car.'
Further, I believe that I, for one, probably lack the 'engineering skill' and even the 'driving skill' to be able to successfully adjust suspension components (coil overs and all!). In other words, I think that the 'average Joe' can realy mess up a car's handling by inept and uneducated 'fidling.'
Again, I really appreciate the expertise and comments of you who responded.
Rob
Very well said!!!
Randy
I am well aware that all cars - even 'performance cars' - are a collection of compromises. Even so, I'm one who actually believes that the engineers who designed the C6 chose well, the resulting 'compromise' that we know as the C6 Corvette is actually a quite capable road car... even occasionally maybe a 'race car.'
Further, I believe that I, for one, probably lack the 'engineering skill' and even the 'driving skill' to be able to successfully adjust suspension components (coil overs and all!). In other words, I think that the 'average Joe' can realy mess up a car's handling by inept and uneducated 'fidling.'
Again, I really appreciate the expertise and comments of you who responded.
Rob
1. EVERYONE that switches to coilovers list them as one of the best, if not THE best, mods theyve done to their vette. They also report it as an across the board handling imporvment, street or track, novice or expert.
2. The ONLY people who put down coilovers are people who have never used them but still somehow feel their opinion is valid.
3. Coilovers are LIGHTER than the stock shocks+leaf springs.
4. The leafspring diehards always point to the GM SAE tech article on leafsprings as the last word on why they are superior to coilsprings, but if you actually read the SAE paper you find out the leafsprings were the compromise choice fo space/packaging concerns, this came up a while back on the Z06 forum, Heres the breakdown of the SAE paper.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...5&postcount=50















