When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Mods are Stinger, LG G5X3, LG Headers/no cats, Stock cans
This number is done WITHOUT u/d pulley or intake. Next up is L92/L76 changeover.
I understand that mod holds more potential, & can be done w/o upsetting driveability, although my driveability is pretty damn good. What are the specs for the G5X3? I locked my sights in on a FAST/cam set up a long time ago w/o researching the L92/L76 combo so w/ hindsight I may have gone that route. But in all honesty 450 driveable horsepower was my goal & I got it, so I am very pleased w/ the final outcome! Please keep me posted as your project unfolds as I am very interested in your results.
See my mods in my signature. Jeff Creach of Carolina Auto Masters also did all my mod work. I dynoed 446 RWHP and 404 RWTQ. Jeff is a great tuner. Congratulations!
Cam specs out at Lift (I) .600, (E) .610, mine is on a 112 centerline altho you can have the same cam on a 114. The duration numbers aren't published. Car is STRONG. I don't listen to the radio much anymore, I'd rather listen to the idle
I knew i was leaving power on the table, but I had planned on doing the L92/L76 changeover all along anyway-which should bump it to around 470-485 rwhp.
05 z51
226/232 113lsa cam
veraram cai
under drive pulley
kooks 17/8
kooks x pipe
tune by Mr Z
3200 Stall
436rwhp
11.20 @120mph
I will do a fast and heads and be in the 10,s
05 z51
226/232 113lsa cam
veraram cai
under drive pulley
kooks 17/8
kooks x pipe
tune by Mr Z
3200 Stall
436rwhp
11.20 @120mph
I will do a fast and heads and be in the 10,s
I am not bashing anyone, but I have noticed alot of Dyno numbers that have been "corrected for altitude".. So don't feel bad if your numbers are low. Mine only made a little over 400, and went almost as fast as cars on here making 40-50 more. So go by track times, not dyno numbers..
I am not bashing anyone, but I have noticed alot of Dyno numbers that have been "corrected for altitude".. So don't feel bad if your numbers are low. Mine only made a little over 400, and went almost as fast as cars on here making 40-50 more. So go by track times, not dyno numbers..
Track numbers are the final positive outcome. As long as there isn't anything unsual about the dyno numbers....like being way off, the higher numbers with similar cam doesn't mean anything.
I am not bashing anyone, but I have noticed alot of Dyno numbers that have been "corrected for altitude".. So don't feel bad if your numbers are low. Mine only made a little over 400, and went almost as fast as cars on here making 40-50 more. So go by track times, not dyno numbers..
FYI, my corrected #s were 467.8rwhp/432.5rwtq. The dyno sheets are posted back to back in thread "C.A.M lays it down!" Given it was a Dynojet 248-H, with very good weather conditions, & reasonable AFR slightly above 12 3K -5K rpm & then at or below 11.5 on out to 7K, I'm fairly confident the numbers are accurate w/o any tuning funny business. The tuner & Spin both predicted 436rwhp, but I think the combo of a custom ground cam, a meticulously ported FAST, & the tuner's skill to max out the combo hit the high marks.
Now that said, there's no better measure of a car than an E.T., but E.T.s are also a function of driver skill more so than any other factor. Given my Hp/tq numbers vs. seat time w/ this set up, I'm under no illusion my first several if not many attempts for an E.T. indicative of the car's potential will hard to come by.
Our numbers are really pretty close, I have a fast intake and not really sure what the difference between g5 and g6 cams are. Your only looking at 7 tq and 28 hp.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.