Need some time slip analysis
In addition to a poorly managed day, by the track, they only let people run the first 1/8 mile, due to the wind...you know: because it might blow the car off the track!
Now I want my Saturday back. (and my $25). Someone....PLEASE open a new track in Utah...PLEASE!Anyway, I only got data to the 1/8 mile but wanted to compare this data w/similar data from my best pass yet.
So to start with, my best 1/4 mile pass to date (that I've recorded)
60'.........2.221
330'.......5.769
1/8........8.611
MPH.......87.36
1000'.....11.023
1/4........13.059
MPH.......110.29
Now here is todays:
60'.........2.100
330'.......5.511
1/8........8.529
MPH.......85.81
Today's abbreviated run got me the best 60' time ever for me in this car on the junk stock tires. What bothers my is why I MPH'ed slower today, even though I ET'ed faster? My 330 to 660 was .2 slower today, which is a LOT. My goal is 12.xx w/a bone stock car...at this elevation. I thought that a 2.1 60' would get me there. But looking at the data from today's run, says to me that had I been able to run this run out to the 1/4, I still wouldn't have hit 12's. In fact, it looks like I would have been even slower than the 13.05 from last summer.
The only thing I've changed in my driving is the moving of my shift point from 5900-6000 to 6400-6500 RPM according to the math I did in this thread.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...1830510&page=2
-I "come around" in post #40.
Now I wonder if the math is correct....
Comments?
I would hate to race at high elev.
In addition to a poorly managed day, by the track, they only let people run the first 1/8 mile, due to the wind...you know: because it might blow the car off the track!
Now I want my Saturday back. (and my $25). Someone....PLEASE open a new track in Utah...PLEASE!Anyway, I only got data to the 1/8 mile but wanted to compare this data w/similar data from my best pass yet.
So to start with, my best 1/4 mile pass to date (that I've recorded)
60'.........2.221
330'.......5.769
1/8........8.611
MPH.......87.36
1000'.....11.023
1/4........13.059
MPH.......110.29
Now here is todays:
60'.........2.100
330'.......5.511
1/8........8.529
MPH.......85.81
Today's abbreviated run got me the best 60' time ever for me in this car on the junk stock tires. What bothers my is why I MPH'ed slower today, even though I ET'ed faster? My 330 to 660 was .2 slower today, which is a LOT. My goal is 12.xx w/a bone stock car...at this elevation. I thought that a 2.1 60' would get me there. But looking at the data from today's run, says to me that had I been able to run this run out to the 1/4, I still wouldn't have hit 12's. In fact, it looks like I would have been even slower than the 13.05 from last summer.
The only thing I've changed in my driving is the moving of my shift point from 5900-6000 to 6400-6500 RPM according to the math I did in this thread.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...1830510&page=2
-I "come around" in post #40.
Now I wonder if the math is correct....
Comments?
The DA on the first run (last summer) was 7600'. Today it was 7100' to 7600' through the day.
-Tom
Yes, racing at elevation is very frustrating. It's nice to compare your results w/others' but that is hard to do from here. All I can compare with is other locals, from this track, which is a limited selection. The frustration is exacerbated by the track we have to contend with here and the extremely limited services they offer. And, unfortunately, it's the only game in town.
My best MPH is 11.3 at 125.x but my best ET is 11.1 at 123.6
Last edited by SoldSyclone; Apr 20, 2008 at 01:42 AM.
I don't see how a better "hook" (although 2.1 60' is still not a "good" launch, IMO) would hurt my 300 to 660 to the tune of .2. I can see a better hook hurting the 60 to 330, and MPH...
Basically the data from yesterday implies that shifting closer to 6500 rather the 6000 is going to slow me down. But since I was only able to run to the 1/8th, I guess it's kind of pointless to scrutinize, since it's pretty limited data.
The one that has more TQ should be faster in your case.
I have run the standing mile many times for fun no clocks but it feels faster shifting lower on my A6 and I see a higher top speed.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The one that has more TQ should be faster in your case.
I have run the standing mile many times for fun no clocks but it feels faster shifting lower on my A6 and I see a higher top speed.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...1830510&page=2
More experimentation is in order. I need REAL track to work at.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Apr 21, 2008 at 05:35 PM.










