When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Opinions? Which is the better choice? Why? I am entertaining the idea for the future... want to know which I should save for. Can't decide, wanted to know some opinions. I figure they are relatively around the same price and make around the same power (Except if I go for more boost). H/C vs about 5-6psi. What are the advantages/disadvantages of both? Let me know. Thanks guys!
With the stock bottom end you will limited to the amount of boost you can make but I think it will still out perform a H/C setup that is pretty reasonably priced and drivable. I would get a blower on the stock bottom end because its easy power. H/C cars have to have all the stars in alignment to get serious power and many of the shops here do that, but slap a blower on and you are forcing the motor to make power, pun intended. Then, if you want you can unbolt it, sell it, trade the car in and its all good. I'd get a quality kit from A@A or ECS then over the next few years save up for a bottom end. If the bug hits you again, forge the bottom and turn up the boost. My car makes a little over 500rwhp all motor but its a stroker and expensive. You can spend $6k on a good complete and safe blower and eclipse that easy. Its more power than you can use on the street and you get hella cool points when you pop the hood.
With the stock bottom end you will limited to the amount of boost you can make but I think it will still out perform a H/C setup that is pretty reasonably priced and drivable. I would get a blower on the stock bottom end because its easy power. H/C cars have to have all the stars in alignment to get serious power and many of the shops here do that, but slap a blower on and you are forcing the motor to make power, pun intended. Then, if you want you can unbolt it, sell it, trade the car in and its all good. I'd get a quality kit from A@A or ECS then over the next few years save up for a bottom end. If the bug hits you again, forge the bottom and turn up the boost. My car makes a little over 500rwhp all motor but its a stroker and expensive. You can spend $6k on a good complete and safe blower and eclipse that easy. Its more power than you can use on the street and you get hella cool points when you pop the hood.
Thanks for the advice. Yeah, I realize that I am limited to around 500rwhp with either setup on the stock bottom end, but I would be more concerned with the tranny, then the bottom end. As far as racing, It wouldn't see the track but maybe once or twice a year... I want something that is going to look good and give me a lot of power. But, I am afraid to do the FI. Just never had any FI of any kind before.
I suggest you go for a ride in a H/C car and one with a supercharger to feel the differences. If its just mashing the pedal and looking for the pull then the S/C is the way to go. If throttle response and low end immediacy are your tweaks then the H/C can be very rewarding. I have been in quite a few S/C cars and they are great up top but the low end isnt what a stroker would give you even with a Magnuson.
You have to drive both to know what I experienced.
If its a street car and will use a street tire, get a H/C package and gears. You will far exceed the tire's ability to handle that power under 80mph.....any size street tire. Overpowering the car is a great way to spin tires and that isnt going anywhere fast.
I suggest you go for a ride in a H/C car and one with a supercharger to feel the differences. If its just mashing the pedal and looking for the pull then the S/C is the way to go. If throttle response and low end immediacy are your tweaks then the H/C can be very rewarding. I have been in quite a few S/C cars and they are great up top but the low end isnt what a stroker would give you even with a Magnuson.
You have to drive both to know what I experienced.
If its a street car and will use a street tire, get a H/C package and gears. You will far exceed the tire's ability to handle that power under 80mph.....any size street tire. Overpowering the car is a great way to spin tires and that isnt going anywhere fast.
Drive both.
Good advice, as always spin! Yeah, It will be a street car and I will be on something like KDW2s or something of the sort. I don't want to overpower the car, and I don't want to just be sitting/spinning there.
I would love to sit in both of these cars and feel them out. It's just too bad that where I am, there are no vettes around!
It's been debated 1000 times and Spin has some good insight. I would imagine FI will effect our cars differently than most due to the already light vehicle. FI was always a good choice with the GTOs due to the fact that the car is heavy and the added low range torque really helped get them moving. But the primary detractor for me is adding 100 lbs of weight directly over the front wheels, which is why it will be H/C for me.
It's been debated 1000 times and Spin has some good insight. I would imagine FI will effect our cars differently than most due to the already light vehicle. FI was always a good choice with the GTOs due to the fact that the car is heavy and the added low range torque really helped get them moving. But the primary detractor for me is adding 100 lbs of weight directly over the front wheels, which is why it will be H/C for me.
I have 477whp here on a cam only Z51 LS3 w/ stock gears and on warm days(~85deg), my car will either hook first gear or haze it(not completely spin) on a good road surface. Whether thats because my car is down on power because of the temp or because the Z51 tires are that good when the temps are hot, I am not sure. Either way, it would appear based off what my car does when its hot, that there are street tires out there that can hold relatively high whp H/C cars.
I have 477whp here on a cam only Z51 LS3 w/ stock gears and on warm days(~85deg), my car will either hook first gear or haze it(not completely spin) on a good road surface. Whether thats because my car is down on power because of the temp or because the Z51 tires are that good when the temps are hot, I am not sure. Either way, it would appear based off what my car does when its hot, that there are street tires out there that can hold relatively high whp H/C cars.
What are your supporting mods? Also, what cam did you go with, what are the specs?
I am hoping to hit 450 with Cam only, with supporting bolt ons.
Vararam, 160t-stat, Kooks headers, Kooks X, B&B Rt. 66, and ASP UD Pulley. Still on the stock uported intake mani and TB. Would like to high 490's~500's when the FAST becomes available w/ a ported TB. Cam is a Vengeance Racing VRX6 cam. I cannot release the specs per their request. I am sure you could call them and coax some details out of them
Vararam, 160t-stat, Kooks headers, Kooks X, B&B Rt. 66, and ASP UD Pulley. Still on the stock uported intake mani and TB. Would like to high 490's~500's when the FAST becomes available w/ a ported TB. Cam is a Vengeance Racing VRX6 cam. I cannot release the specs per their request. I am sure you could call them and coax some details out of them
Can you give me a range on how big the cam is? Like is is in the 230s? Or does it go into the 240s? Also is the lift more than 600? I want to know how much to expect out of a cam with certain specs. I am hoping to stay around a mild idle... IE high 220s or mid 230s, and a lift around 600 on both intake/exhaust.
Those are great numbers. I am expect the cam to be a pretty big cam. How is idle? Drivability? How does it feel compared to stock? I want to try to stay close to stock, but I don't mind a little lope. Thanks!
low low 230's intake duration, low low 240s exh. duration. above .600 for lift both int. and exhaust. Car drives great! No stalls, hot starts, cold starts, idles @ 850rpm . Remember that these LS3's don't need as much cam to make some pretty good numbers. Check out this post of my a buddy of mine. He has an LS2 such as yourself and hit the number your after. http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=2027360
What are your supporting mods? Also, what cam did you go with, what are the specs?
I am hoping to hit 450 with Cam only, with supporting bolt ons.
Keep in mind that 1.8T has an LS3, so his potential on stock heads & stock intake manifold is a bit higher than a LS2. You might look at some of the faster LS2 cars if you are not touching the heads.
i've had both, Vortech blown Z-28'2, and stroked modded N/A motors. I prefer Big inch N/A motors. The low and midrange power of a stroker is much more to my liking. My current motor is a stroked LS3 427, with CNC'ed L92 heads. With a somewhat small street cam 232/234/595/598/112+1 cam it makes 525rwhp/500rwtq with a speed density tune. Midrange is where we spend most of our time, so why not make your power there. Also I don't notice any real drop off at the high end. It pulls strong to 6800 rpms in a heart beat. Personally, I think with an N/A motor set up right you can have the best of both worlds.
Especially for street driving.
i've had both, Vortech blown Z-28'2, and stroked modded N/A motors. I prefer Big inch N/A motors. The low and midrange power of a stroker is much more to my liking. My current motor is a stroked LS3 427, with CNC'ed L92 heads. With a somewhat small street cam 232/234/595/598/112+1 cam it makes 525rwhp/500rwtq with a speed density tune. Midrange is where we spend most of our time, so why not make your power there. Also I don't notice any real drop off at the high end. It pulls strong to 6800 rpms in a heart beat. Personally, I think with an N/A motor set up right you can have the best of both worlds.
Especially for street driving.
Thanks for the info! Yeah, that sounds about right.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.