What is too much? (cam)
Plus, I believe this cam is just about perfect for the 6.0L. Less and you leave power on the table. More and drivability deteriorates real quick in exchange for single-digit gains in peak power which occur in a narrower and narrower band. It is an increase in power that only the dyno will notice. In my opinion, a 224/228 cam is a great choice, and you will not be able to exploit the additional power of a 232+, G5X-whatever, MS3 or similar on the street.
I'm sure some will disagree. Bear in mind that some drive their cammed cars very little on the street and do not rely on them for commuting. I am curious how many with bigger cams (228+) have taken their car on a cross-country trip. To me, that is a key delineator.
Also bear in mind that speed shops have typically lost some perspective on what a "little" cam and what "adequate" power is. When you spend all day tooling around in 700HP cars with 427+ CI, nitrous, 244+ cams, blowers, and turbos, your perspective may be a little different from the typical street driver. I am not saying they always recommend a ridiculous cam. I am saying that their tolerance for the downsides of bigger cams may be higher than yours. The best really is to ride in or drive a cammed car and see if it suits you. You'll know pretty quick.
Last edited by TTRotary; Nov 10, 2008 at 06:28 PM.
Vararam & spacer
Ported FAST intake
1-3/4 Kooks, 3" X & mids, NPPs
U/D pulley
160* stat
Tune by Carolina Auto Masters
The car has excellent street manners & w/ the NPPs closed you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference from stock unless you put it side by side with a bone stock car. Headers, FAST, & cam impossible to hide but it's very mild. I made 400 & 500 mile round trip road trips w/o any concern what-so-ever, & would drive it anywhere w/o hesistation. I just don't make road trips past 5 hours as anything longer I'm flying.
Plus, I believe this cam is just about perfect for the 6.0L. Less and you leave power on the table. More and drivability deteriorates real quick in exchange for single-digit gains in peak power which occur in a narrower and narrower band. It is an increase in power that only the dyno will notice. In my opinion, a 224/228 cam is a great choice, and you will not be able to exploit the additional power of a 232+, G5X-whatever, MS3 or similar on the street.
I'm sure some will disagree. Bear in mind that some drive their cammed cars very little on the street and do not rely on them for commuting. I am curious how many with bigger cams (228+) have taken their car on a cross-country trip. To me, that is a key delineator.
Also bear in mind that speed shops have typically lost some perspective on what a "little" cam and what "adequate" power is. When you spend all day tooling around in 700HP cars with 427+ CI, nitrous, 244+ cams, blowers, and turbos, your perspective may be a little different from the typical street driver. I am not saying they always recommend a ridiculous cam. I am saying that their tolerance for the downsides of bigger cams may be higher than yours. The best really is to ride in or drive a cammed car and see if it suits you. You'll know pretty quick.
I do not wish to give the wrong impression: we used every trick in the book to get to the 485, including unbelievably good head porting, .040 Cometics, vlve change, patriot dual gold springs, hand-ported FAST90 / ported TB, port-matching, UD pulley, race-ported oil pump, and of course intake and LT headers.
Then there are the 4.10 gears, 335 race rubber, CCW rims etc etc. Lot of work, but also a lot of fun and a total sleeper.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts






I am putting this cam in my C6 in a couple of months, along with Livernois Stage 3 heads at 11.7 to 1 static, 8.7 to 1 dynamic compression ratios. Should be fun.
Cam, Vararam, 1 7/8" LT's, Clutch/Fly were all installed in Florida in April. That week, I took the car with 400lbs of gear in it from Florida to Southern California, spent a week driving through CA, then up to Oregon, eventually on to Seattle to ship it here to England. It performed flawlessly the entire drive, save for a stupid Service Charging System message every now and then at idle due to the UD pully.
After awhile, my driving habits changed subconciously. I've noticed it now, as the car never seems to buck or surge when I'm driving, except when applying light throttle down a hill between 1400 and 1600 rpm, and I dont find myself in that part of the power band other than to accelerate through it, usually. Rarely ever on flat ground at anything above 1100rpm to I get any surging. And typically, it's exacerbated by the twin disc while cruising around in town.
Basically, I'm completely fine with a 240 .600+ cam for daily driving. I dont find it to be a burden at all, and I've only killed the car maybe twice in a parking lot after a hot start, trying to idle out of a spot with the wheel all the way to lock, slipping the clutch.
I've had cammed Mustangs, Subarus, and other built cars. This is by far the most civil, and happens to have the most aggressive cam profile.
Cam, Vararam, 1 7/8" LT's, Clutch/Fly were all installed in Florida in April. That week, I took the car with 400lbs of gear in it from Florida to Southern California, spent a week driving through CA, then up to Oregon, eventually on to Seattle to ship it here to England. It performed flawlessly the entire drive, save for a stupid Service Charging System message every now and then at idle due to the UD pully.
After awhile, my driving habits changed subconciously. I've noticed it now, as the car never seems to buck or surge when I'm driving, except when applying light throttle down a hill between 1400 and 1600 rpm, and I dont find myself in that part of the power band other than to accelerate through it, usually. Rarely ever on flat ground at anything above 1100rpm to I get any surging. And typically, it's exacerbated by the twin disc while cruising around in town.
Basically, I'm completely fine with a 240 .600+ cam for daily driving. I dont find it to be a burden at all, and I've only killed the car maybe twice in a parking lot after a hot start, trying to idle out of a spot with the wheel all the way to lock, slipping the clutch.
I've had cammed Mustangs, Subarus, and other built cars. This is by far the most civil, and happens to have the most aggressive cam profile.
Turn of code P0621 (change it to "no error reported") with HP Tuners to stop that annoying dinging from the service charging system. Did it months ago and I don't have any charging system problems.

23x/ 23x, .59x /.60x with a 116lsa is what i have and the car just hauls and has GREAT street manners. The car has never stalled,stubbled what so ever.
Give Cartek a call!

441rwhp & 386rwtq | Kooks 1 3/4,cats, x-pipe | VR,160 t-stat | Cartek 3X cam |
Rt.66 catback | Ported fast90 | ASP underdrive pulley | 3200 Vigilanti converter |
| Stock 2.56 gears | Stock heads and compression |
Cartek tuned and track tested.
Best 1/4 (ET)60ft 1.65 - 11.132@125.03mph...60ft 1.64 -11.133@124.84mph
Best 1/8 (ET)60ft 1.64 -7.172@98.08mph.......60ft 1.65 -7.181@98.38mph
Last edited by Tony B4; Nov 19, 2008 at 11:30 PM.
Turn of code P0621 (change it to "no error reported") with HP Tuners to stop that annoying dinging from the service charging system. Did it months ago and I don't have any charging system problems.
I would think at least 440rwhp with a manual with the same bolt ons as i have.
Cam, Vararam, 1 7/8" LT's, Clutch/Fly were all installed in Florida in April. That week, I took the car with 400lbs of gear in it from Florida to Southern California, spent a week driving through CA, then up to Oregon, eventually on to Seattle to ship it here to England. It performed flawlessly the entire drive, save for a stupid Service Charging System message every now and then at idle due to the UD pully.
After awhile, my driving habits changed subconciously. I've noticed it now, as the car never seems to buck or surge when I'm driving, except when applying light throttle down a hill between 1400 and 1600 rpm, and I dont find myself in that part of the power band other than to accelerate through it, usually. Rarely ever on flat ground at anything above 1100rpm to I get any surging. And typically, it's exacerbated by the twin disc while cruising around in town.
Basically, I'm completely fine with a 240 .600+ cam for daily driving. I dont find it to be a burden at all, and I've only killed the car maybe twice in a parking lot after a hot start, trying to idle out of a spot with the wheel all the way to lock, slipping the clutch.
I've had cammed Mustangs, Subarus, and other built cars. This is by far the most civil, and happens to have the most aggressive cam profile.

Slickshoes, of course Blue cars are the fastest! Just look at the 1/4 mile fast list! An abnormal number of blue cars at the top.
Got a vid clip ? btw, the difference between your engine and mine would be my heads. So maybe close to about 480rwhp w/that cam on my setup?














