C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Question for all the performance mod pro's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #1  
USAF_C6's Avatar
USAF_C6
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 8
From: Papillion, NE
Default Question for all the performance mod pro's

Bear with me as this is the first car I've really gotten into messing with, and my automotive knowledge isn't stellar either. (More airplanes.. occupational hazzard )

So, I spent some time this summer modding my vette, with a target of breaking into the 12's (read 12.999 ), and did the following.

I added a Halltech Venom intake, a 160 Thermostat, and LG Street Series Long Tubes w/High Flow Cats. I also had the car tuned. It dyno'd at 345 RWHP/342 RWTQ, which were gains of 18/26 respectivley from my stock baseline on the same dyno. (These numbers were from a mustang dyno, which I'm told reads low)

The car also has a B&B Route 66 cat back which I added shortly after I bought it.

The car is an 06' A6 3LT base suspension car, on brand new (less than 1000 mi) stock run flats.

I got it out to the drag strip, and wasn't really impressed with the results. I am not a drag expert by any means and am still learning but here is the slip:

60' = 2.187
330' = 5.819
1/8 = 8.693 - 88.46mph
1000' = 11.141
1/4 = 13.192 - 110.29mph

This was the best I could manage across 4 runs. All are very consistant around the 13.1 - 13.2 mark.

So now with that out of the way, on to the questions:

Besides my driving... whats next?

I'm tinkering with two options, gears, or a cam.

Should I have seen bigger gains with my mods?


Look forward to some advice, thanks fellas'!

Last edited by USAF_C6; Nov 25, 2008 at 11:56 AM. Reason: Forgot to list the T-stat..
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 11:47 AM
  #2  
EuroRod's Avatar
EuroRod
Race Director
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18,396
Likes: 169
Default

I see your car is an 06. With your mods, the car should be in the deep 12's. Has the engine had a professional tune since the mods were added?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #3  
Tony B4's Avatar
Tony B4
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 4
From: Cheektowaga NY
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by EuroRod
I see your car is an 06. With your mods, the car should be in the deep 12's. Has the engine had a professional tune since the mods were added?
What were the conditions for the day you ran? What tire pressures did you have the front/rear at(psi)?What were the temps of the oil/coolant before your pass?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 11:54 AM
  #4  
USAF_C6's Avatar
USAF_C6
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 8
From: Papillion, NE
Default

Originally Posted by EuroRod
I see your car is an 06. With your mods, the car should be in the deep 12's. Has the engine had a professional tune since the mods were added?
Yes, as described above.

I also thought I should be in the 12's somewhere. That didn't pan out...
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 11:56 AM
  #5  
USAF_C6's Avatar
USAF_C6
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 8
From: Papillion, NE
Default

Originally Posted by Tony B4
What were the conditions for the day you ran? What tire pressures did you have the front/rear at(psi)?What were the temps of the oil/coolant before your pass?
Well the run above was mid afternoon, mid 60's for the temp. No wind.

Tire pressures were at the normal 30 psi cold. Oil and coolent temps normal.

I should have mentioned above I also added a 160 T-stat. (I'll go back and add it.)
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #6  
Tony B4's Avatar
Tony B4
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 4
From: Cheektowaga NY
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by USAF_C6
Well the run above was mid afternoon, mid 60's for the temp. No wind.

Tire pressures were at the normal 30 psi cold. Oil and coolent temps normal.

I should have mentioned above I also added a 160 T-stat. (I'll go back and add it.)
I ran 12.52,12.53@115+mph in 75 degree air with runflats,and bolt ons only(headers,tune,vararam). My rear tire pressure was at 28psi and i only managed a 2.03-2.05 60fts. You should try and drop your rear tire pressure to 24-28psi for the runflats. The tire pressure all depends if you hooking or not. There isn`t just one psi that works for everyone, it all depends on the conditions for that day.

Whats the elevation of your track?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #7  
USAF_C6's Avatar
USAF_C6
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 8
From: Papillion, NE
Default

Originally Posted by Tony B4
I ran 12.52,12.53@115+mph in 75 degree air with runflats,and bolt ons only(headers,tune,vararam). My rear tire pressure was at 28psi and i only managed a 2.03-2.05 60fts. You should try and drop your rear tire pressure to 24-28psi for the runflats. The tire pressure all depends if you hooking or not. There isn`t just one psi that works for everyone, it all depends on the conditions for that day.

Whats the elevation of your track?
Elevation should be around 1200 - 1300 ft or so.

I'll have to try tinkering with the tire pressure next time.

What was your car putting out RWHP wise with just the bolt on's you mentioned. I'm wondering if there is more to get out of my tune, that my tuner didn't.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #8  
Tony B4's Avatar
Tony B4
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 4
From: Cheektowaga NY
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by USAF_C6
Elevation should be around 1200 - 1300 ft or so.

I'll have to try tinkering with the tire pressure next time.

What was your car putting out RWHP wise with just the bolt on's you mentioned. I'm wondering if there is more to get out of my tune, that my tuner didn't.
I made 356rwhp and 352rwtq with headers,vararam,and tune.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-1

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 12:24 PM
  #9  
USAF_C6's Avatar
USAF_C6
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 8
From: Papillion, NE
Default

Originally Posted by Tony B4
I made 356rwhp and 352rwtq with headers,vararam,and tune.
Do you remember what type of dyno? Mine was done on a mustang dyno, which I've heard read low.

Any thoughts? Should I be looking for another tuner, or another mod? (Gears, Cam)
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 01:21 PM
  #10  
Tony B4's Avatar
Tony B4
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 4
From: Cheektowaga NY
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by USAF_C6
Do you remember what type of dyno? Mine was done on a mustang dyno, which I've heard read low.

Any thoughts? Should I be looking for another tuner, or another mod? (Gears, Cam)


I would see how the tire pressure changes do.

If you goal is to run in the 12`s, just keep messing with pressures.

Last edited by Tony B4; Nov 25, 2008 at 01:24 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #11  
USAF_C6's Avatar
USAF_C6
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 8
From: Papillion, NE
Default

Originally Posted by Tony B4

I would see how the tire pressure changes do.

If you goal is to run in the 12`s, just keep messing with pressures.
I'll definetly try that. What range of psi should I be using?

I think I'm leaning towards a set of 3.42's in the near future too... That should fix it!
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 03:03 PM
  #12  
glennhl's Avatar
glennhl
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,762
Likes: 4
From: Chandler Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by USAF_C6

60' = 2.187
330' = 5.819
1/8 = 8.693 - 88.46mph
1000' = 11.141
1/4 = 13.192 - 110.29mph
I have an 06 C6 A6 with similar mods. I have LG LT's with high flow cats, but with the stock catback (I've since added NPP, but havn't run with that yet). You are running what I ran bone stock. In fact, I ran those numbers bone stock in 100 degree heat. Since my tune, headers, and cold air inlet (Honker knock-off) I've gotten it down to 12.03 at 118 mph. But that was with outstanding air for Phoenix with a 255 foot DA. But even average air (2000 foot DA) I run in the 12.17 to 12.20 range.

I'm not sure what is wrong, but it is not entirely your driving. All you can effect with your driving with an auto is your 60 foot time. I typically pull a 1.900. If you did the same you would run around 12.65 (still too slow). What is really the give-away is your trap speed. It's too low, should be at least 117.

Are you trying to paddle shift? Run in S full auto mode. Just let the car idle at the start line and nail it off of idle. At the most, just put your foot on the gas and bring the rpms up to about 1000 rpm, that's what works best for me. Run with the traction control OFF.

The last thing is you are not running cold air. Do the propped open shroud mod to get cold air. You may be heat soaking your engine in the staging lanes and thus getting warm air into the engine. This can make a big difference. If you can, swap out the inlet to a Honker.

Also, you may want to scan while you make a run to make sure you are not getting a lot of knock retard. There is something that is keeping you from running 117 mph. Since power required goes up to the speed squared, you are losing something like 13% from what you should be making.

Good luck.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #13  
thesubfloor's Avatar
thesubfloor
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 5
From: Brentwood World's first A6 in the 9's (including N/A, blower, turbo and nitrous cars) 9.950@139.267 CA
Default

Originally Posted by USAF_C6
I'll definetly try that. What range of psi should I be using?

I think I'm leaning towards a set of 3.42's in the near future too... That should fix it!
Forget the 12's - gears, a converter and drag radials will easily get you into the 11's.

Go ahead, ask me how I know?

Christopher
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 05:26 PM
  #14  
USAF_C6's Avatar
USAF_C6
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 8
From: Papillion, NE
Default

Originally Posted by glennhl
Are you trying to paddle shift? Run in S full auto mode. Just let the car idle at the start line and nail it off of idle. At the most, just put your foot on the gas and bring the rpms up to about 1000 rpm, that's what works best for me. Run with the traction control OFF.
This is exactly, what I am doing. Sport mode, Competive Driving mode on the traction, wait for the last yellow and nail it. Let the car do the shifting work.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #15  
glennhl's Avatar
glennhl
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,762
Likes: 4
From: Chandler Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by USAF_C6
This is exactly, what I am doing. Sport mode, Competive Driving mode on the traction, wait for the last yellow and nail it. Let the car do the shifting work.
Then it sounds like you are either getting a lot of Knock Retard or you are heat soaking before the run. Did you try raising the hood and letting the engine compartment cool for 90 minutes before a run, then push it through the staging lanes? You also need to do some scans. They don't necessarily have to be at the track, knock retard will show up on the street when you nail it. Your tuner may have put too much timing in the tune????
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 07:19 PM
  #16  
Tony B4's Avatar
Tony B4
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 4
From: Cheektowaga NY
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by SpinMonster
Its a shame people dump so much into the mods that do nothing when they would have improved performance with mods that make a car really fast with the same dollar amount.

Your 60's indicate your tores are really bad.

The gears should be swapped to 3.42's.

Get a decent drag radial.

Exhaust systems do nothing at your power level. At 430rwhp they make 2HP. I think people think since they make a difference on older cars that they are worth 1200-1400 here but they do nothing.

The Vararam will improve performance over your halltech air cleaner assembly. Its also a true cold air induction.

It is likely that your car has heavy carbon deposits running the stock tune for so long. Until a H/C job that isnt fixable and the top engine cleaners dont do anything. I tried both sea foam and GM top engine cleaner before my last head pull and it did nothing.

Youre at 1250 feet elevation and that eats a tenth or 2 on the 1/4

If you get gears, you better have HPtuners and know how to log/tune because you have a blast trying to dial in the shift points at the track with 3.42`s...Just ask Subfloor how long it has taken him to get the trans to shift when he wants it too....I don`t have that problem with the stock 2.56 gears. Thats not to say that i won`t add gears down the road, but be prepared to learn how to tune.

Some may say its a waste if you add power over gears, but it takes alot of time and patience to tune these A6 trannies with gears the right way.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #17  
USAF_C6's Avatar
USAF_C6
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 8
From: Papillion, NE
Default

Originally Posted by SpinMonster
Its a shame people dump so much into the mods that do nothing when they would have improved performance with mods that make a car really fast with the same dollar amount.

Your 60's indicate your tores are really bad.

The gears should be swapped to 3.42's.

Get a decent drag radial.

Exhaust systems do nothing at your power level. At 430rwhp they make 2HP. I think people think since they make a difference on older cars that they are worth 1200-1400 here but they do nothing.

The Vararam will improve performance over your halltech air cleaner assembly. Its also a true cold air induction.

It is likely that your car has heavy carbon deposits running the stock tune for so long. Until a H/C job that isnt fixable and the top engine cleaners dont do anything. I tried both sea foam and GM top engine cleaner before my last head pull and it did nothing.

Youre at 1250 feet elevation and that eats a tenth or 2 on the 1/4
Wow, easy there spin! I'm not an expert, never claimed to be and I apologize for that! Us noobs, wish we had you to parts shop for us 24/7!

Let's be clear, I'm not building a drag car. I go to the strip for FUN thats it. I didn't think shooting for mid 12's was to far fetched for a daily driver.

I agree the 60's suck... I'm on Run Flats, I expect that. I do realize improvment there would help.

3.42's are on the short list. You have a money printer I can borrow?

Ok, I can see your logic on the exhaust. But, while the small performance gain was great, I really did it for the sound and it sounds great!

Vararam, Halltech... All personal choice. You like the Vararam, got it. I was thinking some show, and more go when I decided and settled on the halltech.

Ahhhh, the carbon. You and my tuner agree on this. (The car ran the stock tune for 13k before modding) He recomended giving the sea foam a whirl. But I agree with you, it doesn't do anything excpet require me to change plugs and oil.


So, that brings us to reality. Having read many of your threads, I know you know your craft. So, what's next working with what I have? Low to mid 12's are my target. Bearing in mind, that I'm not trying to build a 1 bazillion horsepower drag monster. Unreasonable?

The 3.42's are on the list for sure. Researching a lot on those lately. Are 3.42's gonna kill my street driving? I like the peace of mind from my runflats (I can feel the heat from the flames on that comment already) Remember Daily driver!

Besides the gears, and maybe a set of drag tires, what else?

Last edited by USAF_C6; Nov 25, 2008 at 07:39 PM.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Question for all the performance mod pro's

Old Nov 25, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #18  
Tony B4's Avatar
Tony B4
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 4
From: Cheektowaga NY
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by SpinMonster
I know you're not a fan of his but I adopted Chuck COW's short-cut on the tuning of gears and get it right the first time out the gate. I have tuned so many of them and never had to adjust anything for track running cars. It works so well that it can be a mail-order thing and I dont charge for it.

As for power and gears, I have been in 3.42 geared A6's and its my first choice. Suspension and tires allolw my car (700hp) to have awesome acceleration with 4.10's. Many people with anti gear approaches to high powered cars use street tires.

The A6 with 3.42's and the right supporting mods are awesome with 600rwhp and thats from first hand experience. Modding any car with the wrong tire will make any resulting observation or opinions worthless.

Fast cars get built from the back to the front starting with gears and tires and then adding only the amount of power that can be effectively used. Dyno queens get modded from the front to the back using power first and then trying to use gears as a band-aid. Such cars get a wondferful view of the back of the car that did it the right way. So its gears and tires first and then add the power until it isnt goetting faster.
Spin,

Subfloor has 3.42 gears,3600 stall converter,cam,bolt ons and ran .10 faster than my 2.56 gears,3200stall converter,cam,bolt ons,fast90.
He cut a 1.55 60ft and i cut a 1.65 60ft.

Now Spin, have you tuned any of these cars with a 32-3600 stall with the 3.42 gears? I can`t comment about your tune, but Subfloor has tons of passes and has been tuning his and has numerous requests from the guys at hptuners on how to get the car to shift when he wants it to. The converter plays a big role in shift times as you know.

Last edited by Tony B4; Nov 25, 2008 at 07:52 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #19  
thesubfloor's Avatar
thesubfloor
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,097
Likes: 5
From: Brentwood World's first A6 in the 9's (including N/A, blower, turbo and nitrous cars) 9.950@139.267 CA
Default

Originally Posted by SpinMonster
I know you're not a fan of his but I adopted Chuck COW's short-cut on the tuning of gears and get it right the first time out the gate. I have tuned so many of them and never had to adjust anything for track running cars. It works so well that it can be a mail-order thing and I dont charge for it.

As for power and gears, I have been in 3.42 geared A6's and its my first choice. Suspension and tires allolw my car (700hp) to have awesome acceleration with 4.10's. Many people with anti gear approaches to high powered cars use street tires.

The A6 with 3.42's and the right supporting mods are awesome with 600rwhp and thats from first hand experience. Modding any car with the wrong tire will make any resulting observation or opinions worthless.

Fast cars get built from the back to the front starting with gears and tires and then adding only the amount of power that can be effectively used. Dyno queens get modded from the front to the back using power first and then trying to use gears as a band-aid. Such cars get a wondferful view of the back of the car that did it the right way. So its gears and tires first and then add the power until it isnt goetting faster.
With the exception of occasionally hitting the rev-limiter if I don't get good launch traction (which will happen to any A6 even with stock gears and a converter) I've never had any trouble getting my car to shift properly at the track.

The only issue I have had was minor in that the car is supposed to shift based on surpassing a preset MPH and RPM plateau, but due to either the TCM or the HP Tuners software the car shifts solely based on MPH.

What this resulted in was my not having as much control as I would like in altering my shift points. As an example, if my car shifts from 2nd to 3rd at 62MPH/6800RPM and I wanted to keep the MPH but lower the RPM to 6700, I can't do it. The only way around this is to lower the MPH setting in my tune and the resulting RPM of the shift will end up being whatever it as for the lower MPH value.

Other than that I have no complaints.

Christopher
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #20  
Tony B4's Avatar
Tony B4
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 4
From: Cheektowaga NY
St. Jude Donor '08
Default

Originally Posted by thesubfloor
With the exception of occasionally hitting the rev-limiter if I don't get good launch traction (which will happen to any A6 even with stock gears and a converter) I've never had any trouble getting my car to shift properly at the track.

The only issue I have had was minor in that the car is supposed to shift based on surpassing a preset MPH and RPM plateau, but due to either the TCM or the HP Tuners software the car shifts solely based on MPH.

What this resulted in was my not having as much control as I would like in altering my shift points. As an example, if my car shifts from 2nd to 3rd at 62MPH/6800RPM and I wanted to keep the MPH but lower the RPM to 6700, I can't do it. The only way around this is to lower the MPH setting in my tune and the resulting RPM of the shift will end up being whatever it as for the lower MPH value.

Other than that I have no complaints.

Christopher
Thats funny, because i have seen your shift points and seen your posts over at HPtuners...Would you like me to continue?
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 PM.

story-0
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-2
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-5
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-6
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-8
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE