Question for all the performance mod pro's
)So, I spent some time this summer modding my vette, with a target of breaking into the 12's (read 12.999
), and did the following. I added a Halltech Venom intake, a 160 Thermostat, and LG Street Series Long Tubes w/High Flow Cats. I also had the car tuned. It dyno'd at 345 RWHP/342 RWTQ, which were gains of 18/26 respectivley from my stock baseline on the same dyno. (These numbers were from a mustang dyno, which I'm told reads low)
The car also has a B&B Route 66 cat back which I added shortly after I bought it.
The car is an 06' A6 3LT base suspension car, on brand new (less than 1000 mi) stock run flats.
I got it out to the drag strip, and wasn't really impressed with the results. I am not a drag expert by any means and am still learning but here is the slip:
60' = 2.187
330' = 5.819
1/8 = 8.693 - 88.46mph
1000' = 11.141
1/4 = 13.192 - 110.29mph
This was the best I could manage across 4 runs. All are very consistant around the 13.1 - 13.2 mark.
So now with that out of the way, on to the questions:
Besides my driving... whats next?
I'm tinkering with two options, gears, or a cam.
Should I have seen bigger gains with my mods?
Look forward to some advice, thanks fellas'!
Last edited by USAF_C6; Nov 25, 2008 at 11:56 AM. Reason: Forgot to list the T-stat..
What were the conditions for the day you ran? What tire pressures did you have the front/rear at(psi)?What were the temps of the oil/coolant before your pass?
Tire pressures were at the normal 30 psi cold. Oil and coolent temps normal.
I should have mentioned above I also added a 160 T-stat. (I'll go back and add it.)

. You should try and drop your rear tire pressure to 24-28psi for the runflats. The tire pressure all depends if you hooking or not. There isn`t just one psi that works for everyone, it all depends on the conditions for that day.Whats the elevation of your track?

. You should try and drop your rear tire pressure to 24-28psi for the runflats. The tire pressure all depends if you hooking or not. There isn`t just one psi that works for everyone, it all depends on the conditions for that day.Whats the elevation of your track?
I'll have to try tinkering with the tire pressure next time.
What was your car putting out RWHP wise with just the bolt on's you mentioned. I'm wondering if there is more to get out of my tune, that my tuner didn't.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

I would see how the tire pressure changes do.

If you goal is to run in the 12`s, just keep messing with pressures.
Last edited by Tony B4; Nov 25, 2008 at 01:24 PM.
I'm not sure what is wrong, but it is not entirely your driving. All you can effect with your driving with an auto is your 60 foot time. I typically pull a 1.900. If you did the same you would run around 12.65 (still too slow). What is really the give-away is your trap speed. It's too low, should be at least 117.
Are you trying to paddle shift? Run in S full auto mode. Just let the car idle at the start line and nail it off of idle. At the most, just put your foot on the gas and bring the rpms up to about 1000 rpm, that's what works best for me. Run with the traction control OFF.
The last thing is you are not running cold air. Do the propped open shroud mod to get cold air. You may be heat soaking your engine in the staging lanes and thus getting warm air into the engine. This can make a big difference. If you can, swap out the inlet to a Honker.
Also, you may want to scan while you make a run to make sure you are not getting a lot of knock retard. There is something that is keeping you from running 117 mph. Since power required goes up to the speed squared, you are losing something like 13% from what you should be making.
Good luck.


Go ahead, ask me how I know?

Christopher
Your 60's indicate your tores are really bad.
The gears should be swapped to 3.42's.
Get a decent drag radial.
Exhaust systems do nothing at your power level. At 430rwhp they make 2HP. I think people think since they make a difference on older cars that they are worth 1200-1400 here but they do nothing.
The Vararam will improve performance over your halltech air cleaner assembly. Its also a true cold air induction.
It is likely that your car has heavy carbon deposits running the stock tune for so long. Until a H/C job that isnt fixable and the top engine cleaners dont do anything. I tried both sea foam and GM top engine cleaner before my last head pull and it did nothing.
Youre at 1250 feet elevation and that eats a tenth or 2 on the 1/4
If you get gears, you better have HPtuners and know how to log/tune because you have a blast trying to dial in the shift points at the track with 3.42`s...Just ask Subfloor how long it has taken him to get the trans to shift when he wants it too....I don`t have that problem with the stock 2.56 gears.
Thats not to say that i won`t add gears down the road, but be prepared to learn how to tune.Some may say its a waste if you add power over gears, but it takes alot of time and patience to tune these A6 trannies with gears the right way.
Your 60's indicate your tores are really bad.
The gears should be swapped to 3.42's.
Get a decent drag radial.
Exhaust systems do nothing at your power level. At 430rwhp they make 2HP. I think people think since they make a difference on older cars that they are worth 1200-1400 here but they do nothing.
The Vararam will improve performance over your halltech air cleaner assembly. Its also a true cold air induction.
It is likely that your car has heavy carbon deposits running the stock tune for so long. Until a H/C job that isnt fixable and the top engine cleaners dont do anything. I tried both sea foam and GM top engine cleaner before my last head pull and it did nothing.
Youre at 1250 feet elevation and that eats a tenth or 2 on the 1/4
Us noobs, wish we had you to parts shop for us 24/7! 
Let's be clear, I'm not building a drag car. I go to the strip for FUN thats it. I didn't think shooting for mid 12's was to far fetched for a daily driver.
I agree the 60's suck... I'm on Run Flats, I expect that. I do realize improvment there would help.
3.42's are on the short list. You have a money printer I can borrow?

Ok, I can see your logic on the exhaust. But, while the small performance gain was great, I really did it for the sound and it sounds great!
Vararam, Halltech... All personal choice. You like the Vararam, got it. I was thinking some show, and more go when I decided and settled on the halltech.
Ahhhh, the carbon. You and my tuner agree on this. (The car ran the stock tune for 13k before modding) He recomended giving the sea foam a whirl. But I agree with you, it doesn't do anything excpet require me to change plugs and oil.
So, that brings us to reality. Having read many of your threads, I know you know your craft. So, what's next working with what I have? Low to mid 12's are my target. Bearing in mind, that I'm not trying to build a 1 bazillion horsepower drag monster. Unreasonable?
The 3.42's are on the list for sure. Researching a lot on those lately. Are 3.42's gonna kill my street driving? I like the peace of mind from my runflats (I can feel the heat from the flames on that comment already) Remember Daily driver!
Besides the gears, and maybe a set of drag tires, what else?
Last edited by USAF_C6; Nov 25, 2008 at 07:39 PM.
As for power and gears, I have been in 3.42 geared A6's and its my first choice. Suspension and tires allolw my car (700hp) to have awesome acceleration with 4.10's. Many people with anti gear approaches to high powered cars use street tires.
The A6 with 3.42's and the right supporting mods are awesome with 600rwhp and thats from first hand experience. Modding any car with the wrong tire will make any resulting observation or opinions worthless.
Fast cars get built from the back to the front starting with gears and tires and then adding only the amount of power that can be effectively used. Dyno queens get modded from the front to the back using power first and then trying to use gears as a band-aid. Such cars get a wondferful view of the back of the car that did it the right way. So its gears and tires first and then add the power until it isnt goetting faster.
Subfloor has 3.42 gears,3600 stall converter,cam,bolt ons and ran .10 faster than my 2.56 gears,3200stall converter,cam,bolt ons,fast90.
He cut a 1.55 60ft and i cut a 1.65 60ft.
Now Spin, have you tuned any of these cars with a 32-3600 stall with the 3.42 gears? I can`t comment about your tune, but Subfloor has tons of passes and has been tuning his and has numerous requests from the guys at hptuners on how to get the car to shift when he wants it to. The converter plays a big role in shift times as you know.
Last edited by Tony B4; Nov 25, 2008 at 07:52 PM.


As for power and gears, I have been in 3.42 geared A6's and its my first choice. Suspension and tires allolw my car (700hp) to have awesome acceleration with 4.10's. Many people with anti gear approaches to high powered cars use street tires.
The A6 with 3.42's and the right supporting mods are awesome with 600rwhp and thats from first hand experience. Modding any car with the wrong tire will make any resulting observation or opinions worthless.
Fast cars get built from the back to the front starting with gears and tires and then adding only the amount of power that can be effectively used. Dyno queens get modded from the front to the back using power first and then trying to use gears as a band-aid. Such cars get a wondferful view of the back of the car that did it the right way. So its gears and tires first and then add the power until it isnt goetting faster.
The only issue I have had was minor in that the car is supposed to shift based on surpassing a preset MPH and RPM plateau, but due to either the TCM or the HP Tuners software the car shifts solely based on MPH.
What this resulted in was my not having as much control as I would like in altering my shift points. As an example, if my car shifts from 2nd to 3rd at 62MPH/6800RPM and I wanted to keep the MPH but lower the RPM to 6700, I can't do it. The only way around this is to lower the MPH setting in my tune and the resulting RPM of the shift will end up being whatever it as for the lower MPH value.
Other than that I have no complaints.

Christopher
The only issue I have had was minor in that the car is supposed to shift based on surpassing a preset MPH and RPM plateau, but due to either the TCM or the HP Tuners software the car shifts solely based on MPH.
What this resulted in was my not having as much control as I would like in altering my shift points. As an example, if my car shifts from 2nd to 3rd at 62MPH/6800RPM and I wanted to keep the MPH but lower the RPM to 6700, I can't do it. The only way around this is to lower the MPH setting in my tune and the resulting RPM of the shift will end up being whatever it as for the lower MPH value.
Other than that I have no complaints.

Christopher









