When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am going with a very small blower cam on my LS3 (GT2-3 or Andy's Stage 2). My goal is to keep low end tq. and stock like driveability. The GT2-3 has and intake of 207 with a .571 lift, Andy's has a 214 dur. but only a .559 lift. Is the 6 one way 1/2 dozen the other as far as CFM into the chamber at 10psi? I am sure there is a formula to figure this out but I wanted to see if anyone had a round about answer.
I am leaning toward the GT2-3 because I want the smaller duration with the higher lift because it has more tq.
I am going with a very small blower cam on my LS3 (GT2-3 or Andy's Stage 2). My goal is to keep low end tq. and stock like driveability. The GT2-3 has and intake of 207 with a .571 lift, Andy's has a 214 dur. but only a .559 lift. Is the 6 one way 1/2 dozen the other as far as CFM into the chamber at 10psi? I am sure there is a formula to figure this out but I wanted to see if anyone had a round about answer.
I am leaning toward the GT2-3 because I want the smaller duration with the higher lift because it has more tq.
IMO I would go with Andy's cam. It has more exhaust duration and also high lift on the exhaust side which was what you need for a FI car. You need to get that air out as fast as it comes in or faster. Andys will also have a better power band. Just my 02.cents
Couldnt you just put on some 1.8 rocker arms and get close to that first cam spec?
No. The higher ratio rockers will change the lift, but have a negligible effect on duration. Also, the relative duration (difference between intake and exhaust) will not change at all. As was previously pointed out, FI engines benefit from increased flow on the exhaust side.
What blower are going to add? If it's a radix, there wouldn't be much difference between the cams you mentioned and the stock cam. If it's a radix, I wouldn't spend the time and money to do the swap. I have no experience with the centrifugals.
From: Austin, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Houston, Dallas, Hong Kong, Elgin, etc.. Texas
Originally Posted by vertC6
I am going with a very small blower cam on my LS3 (GT2-3 or Andy's Stage 2). My goal is to keep low end tq. and stock like driveability. The GT2-3 has and intake of 207 with a .571 lift, Andy's has a 214 dur. but only a .559 lift. Is the 6 one way 1/2 dozen the other as far as CFM into the chamber at 10psi? I am sure there is a formula to figure this out but I wanted to see if anyone had a round about answer.
I am leaning toward the GT2-3 because I want the smaller duration with the higher lift because it has more tq.
I have the GT-11 cam which has 218/231 duration and .631/.644 lift with 118 LSA. There is no loss in low speed torque and the idle is identical to stock. I could probably have kept the stock idle RPM, but bumped it up to 725 rpm just for good measure. I think its a waste of money to go with a smaller cam. The high lift is a good match for higher flowing head, which I have. If your heads are stock, there is little be be gained more than .600 inch. I posted the exhaust sound on Youtube
That lift is too much for me on the GT-11 but I am strongly thinking about going with a cam that is the best of both worlds the Thunder Racing blower cam.
214/230 .601 .579 117 LSA
I has the high intake lift that I want and the long duration on the exhaust and still on the 117 should idle like stock after a little tuning.
From: Austin, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Houston, Dallas, Hong Kong, Elgin, etc.. Texas
Originally Posted by vertC6
That lift is too much for me on the GT-11 but I am strongly thinking about going with a cam that is the best of both worlds the Thunder Racing blower cam.
214/230 .601 .579 117 LSA
I has the high intake lift that I want and the long duration on the exhaust and still on the 117 should idle like stock after a little tuning.
Sorry, I don't think I made my point very well. When I got the GT-11 cam, my goal was to have a stock idle yet take advantage of the ported heads. The GT-11 met my goals.
However, in my opinion, going with a shorter duration cam on a NA car would be a waste of money because it would be too close to the factory cam.
If you are planning to add a blower, then the shorter duration cam would probably be a better choice.
My suggestion to you is to do more research on cam's that are in the 218-224 duration intake and 228-234 exhaust range with .590~ lift.
Just remember that more duration is what helps you make power on the top end as valve events speed up. Lift will not help in that regard. So I would go with Andy's cam of your two choices. However, I would agree that the TR 214/230 cam seems about perfect.
Many like the GT-11 cam, but IMO (and IMO only) running +.600 lift on a hyd high RPM valvetrain (which the LS is) is going to create reliability problems in the long term. At the very least, you'd be looking at spring replacements every 15K and accelerated seat and guide wear, as you are exceeding the geometry and stress the head was designed for. Again, this is IMO, not a fact.
From: Austin, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Houston, Dallas, Hong Kong, Elgin, etc.. Texas
Originally Posted by TTRotary
Just remember that more duration is what helps you make power on the top end as valve events speed up. Lift will not help in that regard. So I would go with Andy's cam of your two choices. However, I would agree that the TR 214/230 cam seems about perfect.
Many like the GT-11 cam, but IMO (and IMO only) running +.600 lift on a hyd high RPM valvetrain (which the LS is) is going to create reliability problems in the long term. At the very least, you'd be looking at spring replacements every 15K and accelerated seat and guide wear, as you are exceeding the geometry and stress the head was designed for. Again, this is IMO, not a fact.
Your opinion respectfully noted.
I was trying not to recommend any one particular cam, least of all the GT-11. I was only offering my opinion that a cam with a shorter duration than the GT-11 on a NA car would be a waste of money.
I would like to also correct myself. The GT-11 cam duration is 215 on the intake not 218 as I stated earlier. However, perhaps the cam is going into an engine with a blower, so a shorter duration cam would be fine.
I totally agree the N/A cam is completely different in regards that you need it to "pull" air in as opposed to a F/I car forces it in so you don't have to worry about having a long duration cam. The trick is to keep the duration on the intake side as short as you can with a high lift so you won't lose your bottom end and tq. Thats why I like the TR cam because its perfect all around. Thanks for the input.