When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Anyone ever seen the CD for the C6 convertible? As far as I have found in a lot of searching, GM doesn't publish it, and maybe they don't know. I know that a Mercedes AMG I was looking at had the exact same CD between the coupe and convertible, but I don't about the Vette.
I can always back calculate it from the top end number and horsepower, I suppose, but if someone's already found this . . .
Anyone ever seen the CD for the C6 convertible? As far as I have found in a lot of searching, GM doesn't publish it, and maybe they don't know. I know that a Mercedes AMG I was looking at had the exact same CD between the coupe and convertible, but I don't about the Vette.
I can always back calculate it from the top end number and horsepower, I suppose, but if someone's already found this . . .
Thanks
I asked this question over a year ago, never did get a definitive answer. I to would like to know, I couldn't even get the top speed number to do the calculations. Perhaps someone will enlighten us. Or we could just reserve some closed course time, run them flat out, and then do the math .
I thought I'd remember reading that it had a cd of something like .31 or .32 (the base coupe being .28 with the C6 Z06 being slightly higher) but don't quote me on that.
I know that a Mercedes AMG I was looking at had the exact same CD between the coupe and convertible
Well, yeah, that's because it's got a heavy retractable hardtop so nothing is changed/nothing is different when measuring between the two LOL. The numbers would be different if the top were down though of course.
Well, yeah, that's because it's got a heavy retractable hardtop so nothing is changed/nothing is different when measuring between the two LOL. The numbers would be different if the top were down though of course.
Yes top being down decreases the amount of wind hitting the top of your car since there's only the windshield, so your CD will go down to like .25 or lower
Seriously I wouldn't take my convertible past 130, be it top on or down, because um, if you roll, um, you're dead either way? Imagine having to swerve going 130, tires lose traction, you start spining, and flip. Well it was nice knowin' ya!
Le Mans Master<br><img src="/forums/images/ranks/5k-6k.gif" border="0">
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,404
Likes: 1
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Originally Posted by LS1LT1
Well, yeah, that's because it's got a heavy retractable hardtop so nothing is changed/nothing is different when measuring between the two LOL. The numbers would be different if the top were down though of course.
I think you'd be surprised how little the difference in weight there is between a coupe and vert. My 2007 M6, 3LT weighed 3350 at the end of eTown (with my fat 230 lb butt sitting in it).
As for drag, the vert with top up would definitely have more drag than a coupe, but I'd want to see wind tunnel data with the top down to believe any number. I can tell you that go fast speeds are much more comfortable with the top down as the soft top vibrates badly otherwise.
I think you'd be surprised how little the difference in weight there is between a coupe and vert. My 2007 M6, 3LT weighed 3350 at the end of eTown (with my fat 230 lb butt sitting in it).
Actually I wouldn't be surprised at all, I too have been correcting people for years when they've tried to claim that the C6 (and especially C5) covertibles weighed so much more than the coupes. I was of course referring to the Mercedes SL line when I said that above.
At one point in the model run the C5 coupe and convertible were listed as within only one pound of each other. Various options can alter the exact weights of either body style of course.
Well, yeah, that's because it's got a heavy retractable hardtop so nothing is changed/nothing is different when measuring between the two LOL. The numbers would be different if the top were down though of course.
I asked this question over a year ago, never did get a definitive answer. I to would like to know, I couldn't even get the top speed number to do the calculations. Perhaps someone will enlighten us. Or we could just reserve some closed course time, run them flat out, and then do the math .
That's the alternative. Tentatively working on July, but a lot of ifs and details between here and there.
I think you'd be surprised how little the difference in weight there is between a coupe and vert. My 2007 M6, 3LT weighed 3350 at the end of eTown (with my fat 230 lb butt sitting in it).
As for drag, the vert with top up would definitely have more drag than a coupe, but I'd want to see wind tunnel data with the top down to believe any number. I can tell you that go fast speeds are much more comfortable with the top down as the soft top vibrates badly otherwise.
Alternatively, my soft top never vibrates, and I go 130+ nearly every weekend on the track.
I haven't really noticed much difference in my trap speeds for my mods compared to others with coupes. I think the CD difference is pretty negligible.
It would be interesting to compare top down windows up, top down windows down, top up windows up, and top up windows down. My guess is that the most drag would occur with the top down and the windows down.
It would be interesting to compare top down windows up, top down windows down, top up windows up, and top up windows down. My guess is that the most drag would occur with the top down and the windows down.
Does anyone have a windtunnel handy?
No windtunnel but gas mileage does seem to agree with your guess. I get the worst with the top down and the windows down. I guess it's like driving a bucket down the street.
So my convertible has better CD than a Z06 or ZR1 - SWEET! Somethin' to brag about finally! Oh, other than the fact that Z06 and ZR1 models dont offer a convertible vette