When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So is this common knowledge that the LS3 c6 will smoke the GS?? Seems like a lot of mods are being thrown around. If the GS is slower "light to light", it can't be by much... Right?
Sounds to me like the GS makes up for the very little weight difference by having taller gearing. I'm not sure if the taller gearing is enough to put it out front, but I'm going to say it would be. I'm a little biased though.
I realize that, that is why I typed “I hate to”…….. He OP stated that he was new to drag racing. The driver mod is the most important modification because we can always become better drivers. If you look at Rangers tips you will notice that he has maximized his ability to launch & drive his car. He is much faster than guys with modded cars.
Most of us consider ourselves to be good drivers. However, there is always room for improvement and suggestions. You will be surprised what you can learn from others, that is one of the most important benefits of this forum..... to draw on others experience.
It is in ones best interest to improve his abilities first as a driver. If you can not launch the car all those mods are worthless as the guy next to you waves Bye bye!
Thanks for the clarification, Tom; however, you're missing the point. Those that point out the obvious, aren't providing much value to the forum. Obviously, a better drag racer will have the advantage. Obviously, practice makes a better drag racer. But pointing that out adds no value to the post. I want to mod my car and I'm not sure which way to go. THAT's what people need to focus on. I can't help but think that those who consistently point out the shortcomings of others may, quite realistically, have some shortcomings of their own. It was even pointed out in the OP that the drivers were equal. Geesh!
Go to Heintz racing they will hook you up! Get a set of headers and a tune and you'll be all set....if that's nto enough they can hook you up with any kind of FI or Cam package you want
I'm hearing a lot of people stating to go with the A&A kit (which I've been seriously considering due to the lower cost) vs. the e-force, but I haven't really heard any reasons why. Is it simply because the costs are lower? I would expect that each has its own driving characteristics because they are two different types of s/c's, and I'd like to know what those differences are if anyone can explain them to me.
Eforce is a positive displacement blower. It makes power everywhere. It will put the tires up in smoke at 2500 rpm, maybe even as low as 2000 rpm. So far, there only seem to be a couple high HP (>650 RWHP) using the E-force, although it should be capable of more than what most people run it at.
The A&A blower is a centri, which builds boost proportionally as rpms increase. At 2500 rpm it isn't making much boost so the car will feel close to stock. As rpm increases so does the boost and power. Very easy to get 700+ RWHP from the centri blower, if you want to build a car for that power. ECS makes a similar kit to A&A that uses a smaller pulley and a restrictor plate to build more midrange boost, but not make so much power at 6500 rpm as to significantly increase the risk of damage compared to a standard lower boost configuration.
For equal peak HP, (e.g. 550 RWHP) I've seen PD blower cars beat the centri cars because of the extra midrange torque. Whether you can use all the torque of a PD blower will be a function of the gear you go WOT and tires. The centri kits are a great value and are easy to crank up if your addiction grows. The ECS kit torque curve from 3000 rpm and up is fairly close to a PD without the cost of E-force.
Eforce is a positive displacement blower. It makes power everywhere. It will put the tires up in smoke at 2500 rpm, maybe even as low as 2000 rpm. So far, there only seem to be a couple high HP (>650 RWHP) using the E-force, although it should be capable of more than what most people run it at.
The A&A blower is a centri, which builds boost proportionally as rpms increase. At 2500 rpm it isn't making much boost so the car will feel close to stock. As rpm increases so does the boost and power. Very easy to get 700+ RWHP from the centri blower, if you want to build a car for that power. ECS makes a similar kit to A&A that uses a smaller pulley and a restrictor plate to build more midrange boost, but not make so much power at 6500 rpm as to significantly increase the risk of damage compared to a standard lower boost configuration.
For equal peak HP, (e.g. 550 RWHP) I've seen PD blower cars beat the centri cars because of the extra midrange torque. Whether you can use all the torque of a PD blower will be a function of the gear you go WOT and tires. The centri kits are a great value and are easy to crank up if your addiction grows. The ECS kit torque curve from 3000 rpm and up is fairly close to a PD without the cost of E-force.
Awesome information! Thank you. I definitely want as much low end torque as possible so i think that the PD is the right blower for me.
I would go this route. Headers, vararam, cam, u/d pully and a tune. That will put you right around 500 to the tires with a decent cam. My car drives better then stock and it didn't affect the reliability at all. You will eat a stock ls3's lunch with that any day of the week. pm me if you have any questions.