When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Check out/google the recent artical from GM High Tech Performance. They tried all kinds of heads and found only minor improvement over the stock LS3 heads. If I recall, it might have been around 5-10 ish HP for most heads. Then they tried cams, and found solid gains. Because the heads are already so good, LS3's respond very well to a bigger cam. It's not unusual for an LS3 to pick up 50-60 or so RWHP with a medium cam. Most on the CF know best, but I think a typical LS3 with headers and cam will drop about 460 RWHP to the dyno. Comments?
Cartek Performance Engineering (www.cartekracing.com) has done some amazing things with their custom ported LS3 heads.
One of their heads and cam packages recently went well into the 10s (multiple 10.8s trapping as high as 129mph ) in the 1/4 mile in a heavy 5th gen Camaro SS LS3 so just imagine what a package like that could do in a much lighter Corvette!
515rwhp in a totally streetable/daily drivable package.
Here's a dyno video and dyno sheet of said Camaro:
I'm torn between having my stock casting ported or going with the TF 235s. I want to up the compression with some milling and a thinner gasket but I'm at .080 PTV right now as is.
My car made 494/443 and is a 10 second machine cam-only but I know I'll want more shortly.
I don't really want to flycut so I'm leaning towards the Trickflows but $3000 when all is said and done is a tough pill to swallow.
I'm torn between having my stock casting ported or going with the TF 235s. I want to up the compression with some milling and a thinner gasket but I'm at .080 PTV right now as is.
My car made 494/443 and is a 10 second machine cam-only but I know I'll want more shortly.
I don't really want to flycut so I'm leaning towards the Trickflows but $3000 when all is said and done is a tough pill to swallow.
Not to start an argument, but, you keep saying "cam only", don't you have other mods?
It's common understanding that cam-only refers to never having the heads off the car. Bolt-ons are bolt-ons, cam-only is bolt-ons+cam and heads/cam is bolt-ons, cam, heads
To me 'cam only' means just that, a cam, nothing else 'cept a tune to work it
Originally Posted by Justinjor
It's common understanding that cam-only refers to never having the heads off the car. Bolt-ons are bolt-ons, cam-only is bolt-ons+cam and heads/cam is bolt-ons, cam, heads
True, in the LSx engine world (and possibly others) 'cam only' automatically implies that the car already has headers, cold air intake and the basic supporting mods etc. It's been that way for roughly 13 years now.
It can also literally mean just a cam and nothing else at all but almost NO ONE does that.
Also, it would be a little strange to do a cam as your first mod. The factory exhaust isn't designed to flow the amount of air that an aftermarket cam would allow so you'd probably not see much benefit without the supporting mods.
There's a reason the majority of people go intake, headers, _______
I'm torn between having my stock casting ported or going with the TF 235s. I want to up the compression with some milling and a thinner gasket but I'm at .080 PTV right now as is.
My car made 494/443 and is a 10 second machine cam-only but I know I'll want more shortly.
I don't really want to flycut so I'm leaning towards the Trickflows but $3000 when all is said and done is a tough pill to swallow.