C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS2 TFS heads trunion ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 06:53 PM
  #1  
pharmd's Avatar
pharmd
Thread Starter
Heel & Toe
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default LS2 TFS heads trunion ?

Is the stock rocker with trunion upgrade adequate, or is their a real concern necessitating I run a full roller?

My engine guy says anything over .600 lift and 6000rpm needs full roller (he is a Ford guy). He also is concerned about spring pressures. Additionally he suggests that once preload is set with pushrod length if the valves need to be adjusted in a different spot it would be nearly impossible with the limited travel lifters. He says with aluminum block/heads preload changes a lot when it gets hot.

I have too much money in the setup as is, and really don't want to have to buy yet another set of rockers. The motor will be used for HPDE, autox, and some daily driving.

Anyone know the documented limits on rpm, lift and pressures these stock rockers with upgrade can withstand?

Any help appreciated!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 07:08 PM
  #2  
SpinMonster's Avatar
SpinMonster
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,094
Likes: 197
From: Colorado Springs, CO
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11
Default

The problem that occured that made TF state you need roller tip rockers with their heads was that the valve stem tips wore causing big damage. Rocker arms dont push straight down on the valve and roller tips reduce lateral pressure on the stems which occurs at all but one position in the range a rocker arm swings.

Using non-roller tip rockers will void the warranty on valve tip wear.

The difference in cost between yella-terra and trunion upgrades is about 300 bucks, it comes down to your comfort level in lying to get a repair when it fails. I would get the roller tip rockers because I wont/can't lie.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2012 | 10:41 PM
  #3  
pharmd's Avatar
pharmd
Thread Starter
Heel & Toe
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SpinMonster
The problem that occured that made TF state you need roller tip rockers with their heads was that the valve stem tips wore causing big damage. Rocker arms dont push straight down on the valve and roller tips reduce lateral pressure on the stems which occurs at all but one position in the range a rocker arm swings.

Using non-roller tip rockers will void the warranty on valve tip wear.

The difference in cost between yella-terra and trunion upgrades is about 300 bucks, it comes down to your comfort level in lying to get a repair when it fails. I would get the roller tip rockers because I wont/can't lie.
LOL, what does lying have to do with choosing a rocker arm. These aren't TFS bought from TFS, they are Advanced Induction's custom CNC TFS castings. They don't have a problem with me running stockers as long as I ran the PM guides, which I am doing.

My question is in reference to what the capabilities of trunion upgraded stock rockers...how much lift, rpm, seat pressure are they capable of running? Right now my understanding is low 0.600's lift (my cam is 0.624), and spring pressures less than 420lbs.

While I do plan to upgrade to T&D or Jesel in time, right now, I just want to get an understanding if I am safe to run the stockers.

Thanks
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 02:55 AM
  #4  
SpinMonster's Avatar
SpinMonster
Tech Contributor
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 12,094
Likes: 197
From: Colorado Springs, CO
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11
Default

Originally Posted by pharmd
LOL, what does lying have to do with choosing a rocker arm. These aren't TFS bought from TFS, they are Advanced Induction's custom CNC TFS castings. They don't have a problem with me running stockers as long as I ran the PM guides, which I am doing.

My question is in reference to what the capabilities of trunion upgraded stock rockers...how much lift, rpm, seat pressure are they capable of running? Right now my understanding is low 0.600's lift (my cam is 0.624), and spring pressures less than 420lbs.

While I do plan to upgrade to T&D or Jesel in time, right now, I just want to get an understanding if I am safe to run the stockers.

Thanks
Your first post said nothing about advanced induction porting/build so anyone reading it may have assumed you simply had TF heads and TF's warranty. The question I was answering for you was this one that you asked:

Originally Posted by pharmd
Is the stock rocker with trunion upgrade adequate, or is their a real concern necessitating I run a full roller?

Any help appreciated!
As TF's use a different valve angle, I posted that I felt you should use the full roller on TF's head. Advanced induction having ported them and built them in my opinion doesnt change the fact that the valve angle is different than stock. Had you indicated in your first post that AI is ok with non-roller tips, I wouldnt have mentioned TFs warranty but I still wouldnt use a non-roller tip on a 13.5 degree head.

To answer your second question in the first post and the one above highlighted in red (what they can handle):

Originally Posted by pharmd
Anyone know the documented limits on rpm, lift and pressures these stock rockers with upgrade can withstand?
As a supporting tuner on this board for years, and having done countless head swaps with various rockers, I've used stock rockers on 800rwhp builds to 7100rpm with .614 lift on XFI lobes and 425lbs open pressure on springs so you should be fine with the trunion upgraded stock rockers if the heads/valves are ok with it...ie the modded rockers will handle it since the stock ones do. In fact, I've never personally had a stock rocker fail on any build. My car had the stock unmodded rockers for 959rwhp for three years, then I sold the car. I only revved to 6800-6900rpm though.

Now ignoring the fact these are TF castings, your ford engine guy is mistaken about the generalization with the stock rocker. Almost no one gets different rockers for head/cam swaps on this board. Just about every cam is over .600 lift with many as high as .646 lift using the bone stock rocker with as much as 450lbs open spring pressure. I have yet to see a dyno sheet of a cammed car stopped under 6600rpm with most going to 6800 with stock rockers. The reason to get the trunion replaced is to avoid the very rare event that the needle bearings get dumped. I've dyno'ed over 100 cars to 6800rpms with stock rockers. I'd bet most tuners who do this full time can say they've dyno over 1000 to that rpm with stock rockers.

I hope these are usefull data points.

Good luck with your build.

Last edited by SpinMonster; Aug 13, 2012 at 06:49 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2012 | 08:25 PM
  #5  
pharmd's Avatar
pharmd
Thread Starter
Heel & Toe
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SpinMonster
Your first post said nothing about advanced induction porting/build so anyone reading it may have assumed you simply had TF heads and TF's warranty. The question I was answering for you was this one that you asked:



As TF's use a different valve angle, I posted that I felt you should use the full roller on TF's head. Advanced induction having ported them and built them in my opinion doesnt change the fact that the valve angle is different than stock. Had you indicated in your first post that AI is ok with non-roller tips, I wouldnt have mentioned TFs warranty but I still wouldnt use a non-roller tip on a 13.5 degree head.

To answer your second question in the first post and the one above highlighted in red (what they can handle):



As a supporting tuner on this board for years, and having done countless head swaps with various rockers, I've used stock rockers on 800rwhp builds to 7100rpm with .614 lift on XFI lobes and 425lbs open pressure on springs so you should be fine with the trunion upgraded stock rockers if the heads/valves are ok with it...ie the modded rockers will handle it since the stock ones do. In fact, I've never personally had a stock rocker fail on any build. My car had the stock unmodded rockers for 959rwhp for three years, then I sold the car. I only revved to 6800-6900rpm though.

Now ignoring the fact these are TF castings, your ford engine guy is mistaken about the generalization with the stock rocker. Almost no one gets different rockers for head/cam swaps on this board. Just about every cam is over .600 lift with many as high as .646 lift using the bone stock rocker with as much as 450lbs open spring pressure. I have yet to see a dyno sheet of a cammed car stopped under 6600rpm with most going to 6800 with stock rockers. The reason to get the trunion replaced is to avoid the very rare event that the needle bearings get dumped. I've dyno'ed over 100 cars to 6800rpms with stock rockers. I'd bet most tuners who do this full time can say they've dyno over 1000 to that rpm with stock rockers.

I hope these are usefull data points.

Good luck with your build.
I agree totally, and am really having a time getting everything done. Such a decrepancy between LS and Ford / SBC etc is creating somewhat of a hardship between our thought processes...I am recommending things that we are all familiar with, and he disagrees and wants to go a different direction. Since I will be doing some road racing, running many laps at high rpm at a time, I got a good deal on some Yella Terra Adjustable shaftmounts, so I went that route and will offset the cost by selling my stock upgraded rockers. It sure wasn't my idea, but I'm trying to leave this build calling him a friend.

I have had 2 motors with stock rockers (not even upgraded) that were on cams with up to 0.620 lift, 1 an LS2 I put 50K miles on, the LS1 I put 20K miles on, both made over 500fwhp, and I never had issues with either otor in terms of rockers or valvetrain stability.

Im trying to put good parts in the build, so hopefully it all comes together well....if I can make 500rwhp I'll be happy.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 09:19 AM
  #6  
Brian@RPT's Avatar
0Brian@RPT
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 1
From: Austin Texas
Default

In this application, I would use a full roller. The Yella Terra Rockers are good to around 400 lbs and that is it. I have seen them break in applications where the spring pressure was to high and the valve train was stressed. With the TFS Heads, the valve guide will wear with the stock rockers..... bronze versus powdered metal. The stock rockers can stab the valve and provides uneven wear on the valve and valve guide.

With that said, most aftermarket rockers are bigger and a tad heavier. The valve cover will need clearanced or use thicker valve cover gaskets.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 07:49 PM
  #7  
pharmd's Avatar
pharmd
Thread Starter
Heel & Toe
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Brian@RPT
In this application, I would use a full roller. The Yella Terra Rockers are good to around 400 lbs and that is it. I have seen them break in applications where the spring pressure was to high and the valve train was stressed. With the TFS Heads, the valve guide will wear with the stock rockers..... bronze versus powdered metal. The stock rockers can stab the valve and provides uneven wear on the valve and valve guide.

With that said, most aftermarket rockers are bigger and a tad heavier. The valve cover will need clearanced or use thicker valve cover gaskets.
These aren't the Yella Terra Ultralights, these are the Platinum Series Race Rocker, these are good to 1000lb open pressure and 0.750 lift, they very close to the Jesel or T&D, but without the true adjustability they offer.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 08:03 PM
  #8  
Neumonic2002's Avatar
Neumonic2002
Drifting
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 29
From: STL MO
St. Jude Donor '09-'10
Default

The top of the TF head where the valve cover seals is .200 taller than a 243 stock casting, I run the larger UL non adjustable YT rollers with a stock valve cover gasket without clearance issues.

Good luck with your build.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To LS2 TFS heads trunion ?

Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-1

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.

story-0
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-2
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-5
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-6
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-8
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE