When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just got off the phone with an authority (local dragstrip owner who attended a NHRA tech symposium last week) and have the definitive answer of the roll bar rule.
The term "unaltered" means absolutely zero changes from the way the car came from the factory, according to the lawyers who wrote the rule. Unfortunately, the lawyers wrote it for liability reasons and left the NHRA to define the limitations allowed.
However, when the top NHRA tech officials at the Div 7 tech session were questioned on the definition by dragstrip operators, they didn't have an answer.
Since the rule is in the book and NHRA can't define the specifics, it's left to the track operator's discretion and interpretation. So if you show up with tinted windows on your brand new ZR1 and the tech guy says you need a rollbar, then you don't get to play. On the other hand, if the tech guy says it's OK to run low 10's with your stripped '90 CRX with NOS and no rollbar, then why worry about the new rule.
The bottom line is that the rule tends to give strip operators a little more leeway and hints at permission to bend the rules as they see fit.
I just got off the phone with an authority (local dragstrip owner who attended a NHRA tech symposium last week) and have the definitive answer of the roll bar rule.
The term "unaltered" means absolutely zero changes from the way the car came from the factory, according to the lawyers who wrote the rule. Unfortunately, the lawyers wrote it for liability reasons and left the NHRA to define the limitations allowed.
However, when the top NHRA tech officials at the Div 7 tech session were questioned on the definition by dragstrip operators, they didn't have an answer.
Since the rule is in the book and NHRA can't define the specifics, it's left to the track operator's discretion and interpretation. So if you show up with tinted windows on your brand new ZR1 and the tech guy says you need a rollbar, then you don't get to play. On the other hand, if the tech guy says it's OK to run low 10's with your stripped '90 CRX with NOS and no rollbar, then why worry about the new rule.
The bottom line is that the rule tends to give strip operators a little more leeway and hints at permission to bend the rules as they see fit.
I hate the local track people, the whole tech section at HMP is a joke. Several times I have gone up to make a pass and refused to run because of the crap they put in the lane next to me. missing lug nuts, heating N20 bottle with a torch and no pressure gauge, no blow down pipe, etc, etc, etc. I have no desire to have one of these beaters lose control and hit my car.
A roll cage is not the same as a roll bar. This rule only applies to cars that otherwise fit the description and specifications of the Summit Racing Series.
True, but that is ONLY if the car is bone stock down to the OEM stock tires and paper air filter.
I'm quite sure that any track with even a remotely thorough tech line/tech process will NOT allow a 2008+ Corvette with a supercharger or nitrous and drag radials/skinnies on it to run under 11.50.
A bone stock (right down to the runflat tires) 2008+ C6 Z06/ZR1, late model Dodge Viper or Porsche Turbo S, all capable of low 11/high 10 second 1/4 mile ETs should be fine under this new rule though.
Local track rules that the intent of the rule is that newer cars are safe enough to go those speeds and that unaltered means chassis and OEM safety equipment...whatever else is free game.
Local track rules that the intent of the rule is that newer cars are safe enough to go those speeds and that unaltered means chassis and OEM safety equipment...whatever else is free game.
I don't think it means that at all. But I guess we'll find out for sure the first time a modified 2008+ Corvette busts out a low 10 at 134mph with no roll bar/harness in the car.
And of course one's local track will still have the final say anyway...they can choose to allow a car with only a 5 point roll bar into the 9s at over 135mph...and they can also throw a bone stock C6 Z06 out of the track facility immediately for running an 11.45 with no bar (not likely, although I have actually seen this happen first hand). Regardless of what the NHRA rulebook states.
I hate the local track people, the whole tech section at HMP is a joke. Several times I have gone up to make a pass and refused to run because of the crap they put in the lane next to me. missing lug nuts, heating N20 bottle with a torch and no pressure gauge, no blow down pipe, etc, etc, etc. I have no desire to have one of these beaters lose control and hit my car.
I once got kicked out for refusing to race such a car.
If the car is nitroused up and/or looks fast, I now just stage and wait until they are 1/2 way down the track before I leave. If it's a slow car and I know I'll be way out in front of them I'll go ahead and try to cut a light.
I don't think it means that at all. But I guess we'll find out for sure the first time a modified 2008+ Corvette busts out a low 10 at 134mph with no roll bar/harness in the car.
And of course one's local track will still have the final say anyway...they can choose to allow a car with only a 5 point roll bar into the 9s at over 135mph...and they can also throw a bone stock C6 Z06 out of the track facility immediately for running an 11.45 with no bar (not likely, although I have actually seen this happen first hand). Regardless of what the NHRA rulebook states.
Until NHRA further defines the ruling, it's up to the individual track to determine how they choose to handle the tech issue.
Firebird (Phoenix) has always been real tight. They once gave me a warning at 11.57 and booted out a friend whose back bars of his rollbar met the size the rulebook mandated, but claimed the rulebook was wrong.
Speedworld (Phoenix) has been fairly loose in that they look more closely at the quality of the car and the ability of the driver, rather than being solely focused on a timeslip number.
Until NHRA further defines the ruling, it's up to the individual track to determine how they choose to handle the tech issue.
Firebird (Phoenix) has always been real tight. They once gave me a warning at 11.57 and booted out a friend whose back bars of his rollbar met the size the rulebook mandated, but claimed the rulebook was wrong.
Speedworld (Phoenix) has been fairly loose in that they look more closely at the quality of the car and the ability of the driver, rather than being solely focused on a timeslip number.
True.
So the best way to avoid any conflicts at all and get to race all day long is for people to simply buy one of your awesome (and easily removable) roll bars (and a harness belt of course) and call it a day.
Originally Posted by timd38
Just look at the amount of opinions on this thread, just think how many the strip operators will have!
Wondering why they start with 2008? Frame and body wise - aren't the 2005, 2006, and the 2007's the same. Just saying ........
Our local track owner mentioned GTR, ZR1, Mustang Cobra (?), Viper, SRT hemi, and CTS-V as being some of the cars recently on the market that could go sub-11.5 from the factory. I mentioned the Z06 was available in '06. Since the factory spec was 11.7, it didn't raise any flags. Personally, I don't think the hemi could go that quick either.
He also said most all cars are far stronger now than when the rollbar rule was first in effect. i.e. body/frame was not a major factor.
He also said most all cars are far stronger now than when the rollbar rule was first in effect. i.e. body/frame was not a major factor.
This has been my point for years.
Frankly I question how the NHRA thinks they can design an automobile better than the car manufacturers?
If the car manufacturers, who are subject to roll over and many more regulations, don't believe a steel bar is an appropriate thing to have inches away from a driver's head, why does the NHRA think this is a good thing?
Frankly I question how the NHRA thinks they can design an automobile better than the car manufacturers?
If the car manufacturers, who are subject to roll over and many more regulations, don't believe a steel bar is an appropriate thing to have inches away from a driver's head, why does the NHRA think this is a good thing?
I dont think the car manufactures crash test there cars at 120+ into walls.. And most dont people cruise around town with a helmet on
Frankly I question how the NHRA thinks they can design an automobile better than the car manufacturers?
If the car manufacturers, who are subject to roll over and many more regulations, don't believe a steel bar is an appropriate thing to have inches away from a driver's head, why does the NHRA think this is a good thing?
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.