Questions about launching.....
Thx in advance.
If you would like launching tips, this is a great resource:
www.rangeracceleration.com
Pay attention to all sections including shifting and very importantly, clutch fluid maintenance. The procedures have served me very well for the last 12 years with my Vettes.
If you would like launching tips, this is a great resource:
www.rangeracceleration.com
Pay attention to all sections including shifting and very importantly, clutch fluid maintenance. The procedures have served me very well for the last 12 years with my Vettes.
Don't have the Johnny O sways and shocks, so couldn't offer you any words on that.
Softer in the rear will allow the car to settle in on the back suspension and grab traction faster.
Sticky tires and tuned suspension should assuage any concerns regarding wheel hop. If the chatter is still an issue, maybe see about going with some adjustable coil overs to try and remedy it. Here's a link to the topic just in case:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c5-t...solutions.html
Don't do the two step.
MGW is a good choice. They no longer sell the shifter and lower box assembly separate, so you'll be receiving both when you buy it (for the former price of the shifter only, it's a great deal).
Last edited by DillingerRadio; Mar 12, 2014 at 12:37 AM.




Maybe the reasoning doesn't apply to me because my car's an automatic, but I think the thing was the best $200 I ever spent. Ever since I installed one it has been a LOT more consistent at the track because it totally eliminates the difficulty of trying to hit a target RPM when launching the car.
Prior to buying it, although I would usually aim for 1900RPM I didn't always achieve it. Now it's just a no-brainer in that I pre-stage, stage and then step on the gas and go.
The other benefit is that it allows me to make very small adjustments to compensate for how the staging lights are set up at different tracks. With Sonoma Raceway as an example, I can usually cut lights in the .030 to .040 range with it set to 1900RPM. At the first race after they installed new timing equipment at Sacramento Raceway, I initially couldn't figure out why with everything else being the same my lights were in excess of .100. Rather than try to adjust how I react to the tree, all I needed to do was bump up the launch RPM to 2100 and voila, my reaction times immediately went back down to where they were supposed to be.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
My 2010 base model has launch control - put car in competitive mode, push accelerator to floor and the rpm drops to around 4k, and then dump the clutch. I've only tried it once and it was low temps so GY RF's didn't hook up very well. Like you're saying - keep rpms at 4k and it's pretty much the same thing - except I think the literature says the TC is monitoring wheel spin several times per second.
Last edited by BillH2121; Mar 12, 2014 at 12:16 PM.
Prob why Pfadt chose the stiffest rear sway bar for their drag package.
Last edited by tiresmoke69; Mar 12, 2014 at 12:28 PM.
Maybe the reasoning doesn't apply to me because my car's an automatic, but I think the thing was the best $200 I ever spent. Ever since I installed one it has been a LOT more consistent at the track because it totally eliminates the difficulty of trying to hit a target RPM when launching the car.
Prior to buying it, although I would usually aim for 1900RPM I didn't always achieve it. Now it's just a no-brainer in that I pre-stage, stage and then step on the gas and go.
The other benefit is that it allows me to make very small adjustments to compensate for how the staging lights are set up at different tracks. With Sonoma Raceway as an example, I can usually cut lights in the .030 to .040 range with it set to 1900RPM. At the first race after they installed new timing equipment at Sacramento Raceway, I initially couldn't figure out why with everything else being the same my lights were in excess of .100. Rather than try to adjust how I react to the tree, all I needed to do was bump up the launch RPM to 2100 and voila, my reaction times immediately went back down to where they were supposed to be.
I find it a lot easier to modulate the launch RPM with my right foot. I know Gary2003Z06 agrees. Now he does use a two step for bracket racing but he has it set for a very low rpm and has learned to release the clutch so quickly the car doesn't over-rev. If I recall he basically dumps the clutch when bracket racing but the rpm is so low it hasn't broken anything yet.
But like me, when he's going for a record run, he uses his foot to control the RPM's during the launch, it's just a lot easier to control the process.
Tiresmoke69 - Not exactly. If track conditions are optimal and tires are sticking well- then yes, stiffer suspension is better. If track conditions are poor or otherwise unsuitable for grabbing the road, the softer setup is better for the weight transfer to plant the tires.
Subfloor@CenturyTrans - see Joe_G's explanation. I personally prefer manual modulation for optimal RPMs, and on a wiggy setup like a two-step you risk a lot (especially at higher HP/TQ). Especially if you're not familiar enough with it to accurately handle the timing.




Tiresmoke69 - Not exactly. If track conditions are optimal and tires are sticking well- then yes, stiffer suspension is better. If track conditions are poor or otherwise unsuitable for grabbing the road, the softer setup is better for the weight transfer to plant the tires.
Subfloor@CenturyTrans - see Joe_G's explanation. I personally prefer manual modulation for optimal RPMs, and on a wiggy setup like a two-step you risk a lot (especially at higher HP/TQ). Especially if you're not familiar enough with it to accurately handle the timing.
If we could just dump the clutch like a 12 bolt chevy nova can do then that's a different story. Our cars take too much finesse to be as consistent as you need to be on the tree to compete with you automatic guys with a two step.
You have pretty much hit the nail on the head except that I have broken in competition and had to change the right side CV axle in between rounds.
This was on my MT 305/35R19 DRs street setup. Two step was set at 2500 and the track was extremely tight due to an X275 race the preceding day. Missed the second qualifier. I did not trailer the car this time so I raced on the only spare axle that I brought. I was overly cautious the first round and cut a 0.150
but as luck would have it, my opponent went red. The next round I cut a 0.65 slipping the clutch (no 2-step) but the Mustang cut an 0.014 by dumping his clutch. I fender raced him and took the stripe by 0.019 but broke out by a few hundredths. The Stang won the event because he could dump his clutch and cut 0.00x to 0.01x lights all day long. The guy was good.The next race, I switched back to MT 26x11.50x16 ET Streets to run the 10.50 class on a Pro 0.500 Tree. The two step was set to 2200. The lights that day were -0.012, -0.013, 0.033, 0.044. The car reacted so quickly on the first two runs, I had to find a way to slow it down. (The car was extremely shallow barely lighting the second bulb.) Dropped front tire pressure and raised the rears til they spun on the hit. Went to the finals and lost to one of my buddies who was running an auto and going in deep. (I did tree him by a little; however, I smoked the tires, came out sideways, had a 1.77 sixty and ran out of real estate. 10.65 @ 134.66. Great race and a lot of fun.
Back to the topic- Two steps are great for adjustable clutches or clutches that inherently slip on their own. (I would not trust the latter.) They do allow sticks to be much more competitive and keep you from over-revving in competition. Breakage is lessened at low rpm but not a guaranty. As Joe stated, a controlled slip is much easier on parts.
OP- I assume that you will be running some sort of skinny with the ET Streets out back. Those tires are very good in recovery and softer on drivetrain parts than a DR. Good luck.
You have pretty much hit the nail on the head except that I have broken in competition and had to change the right side CV axle in between rounds.
This was on my MT 305/35R19 DRs street setup. Two step was set at 2500 and the track was extremely tight due to an X275 race the preceding day. Missed the second qualifier. I did not trailer the car this time so I raced on the only spare axle that I brought. I was overly cautious the first round and cut a 0.150
but as luck would have it, my opponent went red. The next round I cut a 0.65 slipping the clutch (no 2-step) but the Mustang cut an 0.014 by dumping his clutch. I fender raced him and took the stripe by 0.019 but broke out by a few hundredths. The Stang won the event because he could dump his clutch and cut 0.00x to 0.01x lights all day long. The guy was good.The next race, I switched back to MT 26x11.50x16 ET Streets to run the 10.50 class on a Pro 0.500 Tree. The two step was set to 2200. The lights that day were -0.012, -0.013, 0.033, 0.044. The car reacted so quickly on the first two runs, I had to find a way to slow it down. (The car was extremely shallow barely lighting the second bulb.) Dropped front tire pressure and raised the rears til they spun on the hit. Went to the finals and lost to one of my buddies who was running an auto and going in deep. (I did tree him by a little; however, I smoked the tires, came out sideways, had a 1.77 sixty and ran out of real estate. 10.65 @ 134.66. Great race and a lot of fun.
Back to the topic- Two steps are great for adjustable clutches or clutches that inherently slip on their own. (I would not trust the latter.) They do allow sticks to be much more competitive and keep you from over-revving in competition. Breakage is lessened at low rpm but not a guaranty. As Joe stated, a controlled slip is much easier on parts.
OP- I assume that you will be running some sort of skinny with the ET Streets out back. Those tires are very good in recovery and softer on drivetrain parts than a DR. Good luck.
From 3/15/14
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...a-si-trim.html













