When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Yes we bought pistons with a larger valve relief as instructed by the performance shop, the operator did not hook up a single sensor to the car he merely drove it on the dyno did 4 pulls in a row and drove off so I can't tell you timing, the only reason I know the Afr is through the wideband I had previously installed. The engine temp held 178 through each pull
It sounds like is running fine and there's nothing telling you that is running poor other than the dyno numbers which can always be taken as a grain of salt.
Timing can actually take power away on these engines hence the question about it. Also it must tuned quite well to only be surging below 1,500 with an aggressive cam and no street tuning. I can tell that leaning the afr should give you more hp but take her to the track and see what it does.
I am just so confused because there are bone stock ls3s out there with 408 wheel and my ls3 has heads/cam/intake/tune/exhaust/Bolton, and has the same power numbers?
where??? are the bone stock LS3's getting 408 to the wheels where??
435 - 15% = 65.25 - 435 = 369.25 and with that work you think the car should be making 458 at the wheels? how do you figure? just love you forum engineers, how do you think GM gave you 435?
435 - 15% = 65.25 - 435 = 369.25 and with that work you think the car should be making 458 at the wheels? how do you figure? just love you forum engineers, how do you think GM gave you 435?
Do some research, there are many cam only ls3s making over 500 wheel with no headwork done to them
A stock ls3 (dry sump) makes 403-415whp tuned on our dynapack dyno and a wet sump LS3 stock makes 390-410whp. Looking at the dyno chart my guess would be a combination of tuning and dyno calibration even if they are one of the top dynos.
me personnally i would find another tuner if not just for the 11.9 across the board...no telling what the timing is like.
...and regarding those that think the track is better. Just how many variables do you think that adds to the equation?! Weather (humidity, temp, altitude), track conditions, tires, car setup, not to mention the biggest variable of all.....the typical driver. Not to mention the OP may have no baseline track data to compare to.
Now answer why you see such consistency in dyno numbers from across the country. Sure, there are always a few outliers, but the consistency is way better. If not, do you really think the Federal Government would let the automakers certify the engine using a dyno?
Thank you everyone for the great answers!! I am going to have an appointment set up for a dyno tune and hope to see better results, the tuner that tuned this car had absolutely no idea what an ls3 was and had no past experience with ls engines or really gm engines at all, and plus its not a dyno tune on the car it's an hp tuners tune.
Thank you everyone for the great answers!! I am going to have an appointment set up for a dyno tune and hope to see better results, the tuner that tuned this car had absolutely no idea what an ls3 was and had no past experience with ls engines or really gm engines at all, and plus its not a dyno tune on the car it's an hp tuners tune.
I didn't know you could tune a car without a dyno but I guess you can?
I didn't know you could tune a car without a dyno but I guess you can?
Yes you can, and mine was done on the street. The most important factors to tune are the knowledge, the programmer and the wideband for an accurate a/f ratio.
I didn't know you could tune a car without a dyno but I guess you can?
There are so many variables. I have gotten around 430 on stock LS3 with headers and our Mamba with an auto. With a engine having bolt on parts though you can really lose some power with improper assembly. Was the cam degreed in or did they just drop it in. Was it retarted or advanced.
After that the calibration can play a huge part. What was the final timing and lambda, like I said there are allot of variables to pinpoint just a reason as to what could be wrong.
435 - 15% = 65.25 - 435 = 369.25 and with that work you think the car should be making 458 at the wheels? how do you figure? just love you forum engineers, how do you think GM gave you 435?
Weli it is 430 for non NNP LS3.
I dynoed 375 rwhp and with a tune got 400 rwhp. Added long tubes with hi flow cats and saw 422 rwhp. With a mild came I would expect to see 445-450 rwhp.
The cam mentioned was a good deal more aggressive so I was thinking maybe 50 hp cam. The heads should of add some more too. I was conservative with my 450 ish rwhp number.
My driveline power loss was closer to 12 1/2%
Huys had made around 500 rwhp with long tubes and a big cam and head work.
Did you ever try an old school compression test? Maybe you have a leaky valve or two. Maybe rings on those new pistons not gapped right or seated in yet. Maybe need more break in.