C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Want to add cold air intake - looking for advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2016, 08:23 AM
  #21  
Dcasole
Le Mans Master
 
Dcasole's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,892
Received 2,257 Likes on 1,643 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanC6
I would assume the new vararam version has fixed those issues.
I have the new version and yes they fix them but.....you still have to make sure you install and align it properly

If the bottom part is not lining up with the top you will get the bowing of the flange and the gasket rolling that others are complaining about. Remember it's hot under that hood and the unit is some sort of plastic

Careful installation is the key.

I also changed over to a paper filter ......

Dave
The following users liked this post:
Ask12b1 (06-28-2016)
Old 06-23-2016, 04:26 PM
  #22  
LF97C5Vette
Burning Brakes
 
LF97C5Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,195
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dcasole
I have the new version and yes they fix them but.....you still have to make sure you install and align it properly

If the bottom part is not lining up with the top you will get the bowing of the flange and the gasket rolling that others are complaining about. Remember it's hot under that hood and the unit is some sort of plastic

Careful installation is the key.

I also changed over to a paper filter ......

Dave
Mine was installed fine. It's 6 years old - I think it warped from heat/age. If someone is asking about a specific intake - I feel that potential quality, and/or design issues on that intake are relevant to the conversation.

Do me a favor and pop off your intake and take a picture of your throttle body. I'd love to see how clean it is with the new version. I'd also love to see throttle bodies from other folks with other intakes too. It's entirely possible mine would look just as dirty running the honker as it did with the vararam.
The following users liked this post:
Ask12b1 (06-28-2016)
Old 09-01-2016, 08:44 AM
  #23  
Enuzio
Heel & Toe
 
Enuzio's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default flow and filtration

Originally Posted by LF97C5Vette
Mine was installed fine. It's 6 years old - I think it warped from heat/age. If someone is asking about a specific intake - I feel that potential quality, and/or design issues on that intake are relevant to the conversation.

Do me a favor and pop off your intake and take a picture of your throttle body. I'd love to see how clean it is with the new version. I'd also love to see throttle bodies from other folks with other intakes too. It's entirely possible mine would look just as dirty running the honker as it did with the vararam.
bobtheoilguy.com ( I think is the link) and the GM Diesel Truck guys did some interesting comparative engineering analysis of paper vs cloth filters and found that paper will filter 7 to 10 times better than cloth...but at some reduced flow...if the filter is big enough then that is not an issue. on an LS2 the real restriction is the transition from under the filter going into the housing plenum before the throttle body. Given that, it does not look like the intake was designed with fluid dynamics software. On my 07 I opened the top of the stock housing and made my own shroud... sort of like a Halltech Bee Hive. It works, but not spectacularly, and keeps the engine clean.

I am more concerned about engine longevity and filtration.


Hib Halverson did some testing on K & N's dyno and found no performance improvement on a C4 as the stock filter would support 600 hp.

Last edited by Enuzio; 09-01-2016 at 08:48 AM. Reason: added comment
Old 09-01-2016, 02:35 PM
  #24  
Dcasole
Le Mans Master
 
Dcasole's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,892
Received 2,257 Likes on 1,643 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LF97C5Vette
Mine was installed fine. It's 6 years old - I think it warped from heat/age. If someone is asking about a specific intake - I feel that potential quality, and/or design issues on that intake are relevant to the conversation.

Do me a favor and pop off your intake and take a picture of your throttle body. I'd love to see how clean it is with the new version. I'd also love to see throttle bodies from other folks with other intakes too. It's entirely possible mine would look just as dirty running the honker as it did with the vararam.
My Vararam has been on for about a year now



I was very careful with oiling it the correct way

Dave
Old 09-01-2016, 05:00 PM
  #25  
jstewart
Burning Brakes
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jstewart's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 899
Received 209 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

That looks just like what I experienced with a Vararam system on my 08 C6. In addition to the lousy sealing around the foam gaskets which I tried repeatedly to resolve one of the latches refused to stay latched (popped open repeatedly). No help from Vararam resolving the issues so from my viewpoint this is a sub par quality product for street use. It may produce quicker 1/4 mile times but was not suitable for everyday use. I could not in good conscience resell this shoddy system so I trash canned it.

Originally Posted by LF97C5Vette
I'd go with something that you KNOW will seal well, and that the filter is easy to inspect and clean.

I'll never run a vararam intake on any of my cars again. I've owned 2 over the last 10 years, for a few years each. And I hated both of them.

First on my C5 and second on my C6 - and both had serious issues sealing.


If you're regularly tracking the car, and care about the 3-4 mph trap, and the few tenths it'll shave off in the quarter. Or you're trying to push some limit and hit some magical dyno number and need the extra 3-4 hp - then Sure. Go for it, run the Vararam, it's clearly the best for performance.

HOWEVER, if you're daily driving the car - and care about longevity of your engine, and don't want to have to worry about your filter sealing, and/or check the filter every weekend. Then I'd avoid the vararam systems, and find something that's simple to inspect/clean/maintain.




C5 Vararam Housing - you can see some gaps that didn't seal well - I tried using putty and it still wasn't a great seal.




Maybe this is normal - but I didn't like all the grit that was getting past the filter and into my engine. Despite my regular checking to make sure it's clean.




Here's my C6's vararam. You can see the housing has warped/bowed out - and the foam strip isn't sufficient to seal all the gaps. Again, I packed putty into the gaps to help seal, but I simply shouldn't have to...

I'm sure I'll catch some hate from all the Vararam fans on here - but I can't honestly recommend using this intake for anybody who doesn't regularly track the car. I think it's just too poorly constructed, and adds unnecessary risk to engine longevity.

Good luck with your purchase! I'm tossing my C6's vararam and switching to something more like SLP Blackwing, Airaid, or some other system that's easy to seal, and inspect.
Old 09-04-2016, 09:31 AM
  #26  
njedwardz
Pro
Support Corvetteforum!
 
njedwardz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

I have a 2013 A6 with a Halltech MF107R (with the beehive that isolates it from engine bay heat) along with a slew of other mods - that CAI, along with a tune and headers, picked up 70 RWHP.

Now, most of that was probably in the tuning improvements and substantial improvement in the headers, but the cooler air available from the CAI (and slightly less restriction) helped optimize the overall system.

I assume the Vararam or Callaway systems are equal or close to the quality of the Halltech. Regardless of which system you go with, I'd highly recommend a dyno tune with wideband AF calibration by a reputable tuner to get you as much out of it as possible (but that will roughly double your cost in my experience).

Is it worth it? I think so, but I guess you have to decide that one for yourself. My initial mods (intake, tune, headers, install, dyno time, etc.) cost ~$3k, I think. Works out to around $43/hp to do it right through an installer - a lot less if you want to do it yourself, but I didn't have the tools back then. For some like me, it's a drop in the bucket of what I've invested in this car, but for others, it may seem outlandish. Entirely up to you.
Old 09-04-2016, 12:25 PM
  #27  
KBoltz
Drifting
 
KBoltz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: South Georgia
Posts: 1,969
Received 41 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I can attest that I have an Airaid CAI. 2008 LS3

With the CAI, changing from a stock LS3 exhaust (SLP Loudmouth I cat back) to a 08 Z06 exhaust, and a tune from EFI Alchemy, my car dynoed at 406 rear wheel horsepower and 400 ft. lbs of torque. With just the CAI and tune it dynoed at 376 rwhp. I say the tune and exhaust made more of a difference.

I do HPDE and autocross. Does it really make a difference? Maybe, maybe not. I spent significantly more on the Pfadt inverted sport shocks, Pfadt adjustable sway bars and C6 Z06 brakes, seeing that those would make much more of difference in my application.
The following users liked this post:
bigbsp (09-05-2016)
Old 09-06-2016, 04:43 PM
  #28  
Orion2011
Burning Brakes
 
Orion2011's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Shelbyville Kentucky
Posts: 889
Received 174 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

CAI are not snake oil per say. If they are truly Cold air. Here is the stock table from the ECM that shows how aggressively the computer pulls timing just based on Intake Air temp. My logs show it easy to have 100*+ IAT temps.

Last edited by Orion2011; 09-06-2016 at 04:45 PM.



Quick Reply: Want to add cold air intake - looking for advice



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.