When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 2007 A6 ,I currently have TSP long tube headers and a TSP 224/224 .600 114LSA cam. Took my car to get tuned and pulled 387 whp and 372 ftlb . I see people on YouTube pulling 380-390 with an LS2 CAI, long tubes, with no cam. Do the numbers I got sound correct for the mods listed?? Please give advice!
380-390 is high for an LS2 headers/intake only IMO. But your cam should have you up more than what your dyno shows IMO. Unless its a stingy mustang dyno.
My dyno was in my butt, as it felt like a different car, pulled much harder. My numbers were disappointing like you said but I KNOW ITS CONSIDERABLY FASTER.
I have testimony from other members that have the same mods to the T, DynoJet dyno showed right at 404-408 RWHP while the DynoDynamics showed just what mine did, 364 RWHP and although not same day, same tuner, I believe it holds true to a certain degree.
We wont even bring up the difference in the "sound", that alone makes it faster
NSF
The only real dyno number is YOUR before and after, done the same day, just after they did the mods.
Everything else is apple to oranges.
its just a number ..... and that number can be different between day by day and in some cases hour by hour
the true measurement is at the track ... what does the time slip say and what MPH and I can tell you, you can get pretty close to what the motor is producing for real with just those two numbers
My dyno was in my butt, as it felt like a different car, pulled much harder. My numbers were disappointing like you said but I KNOW ITS CONSIDERABLY FASTER.
I have testimony from other members that have the same mods to the T, DynoJet dyno showed right at 404-408 RWHP while the DynoDynamics showed just what mine did, 364 RWHP and although not same day, same tuner, I believe it holds true to a certain degree.
We wont even bring up the difference in the "sound", that alone makes it faster
NSF
Yeah Bobby, you really needed a baseline readout. In your case, you DIYed the install, then dynoed, so you cannot know the actual gain.
But as you've said (and I agree)...who cares....if you're looking for personal satisfaction - the sound - the feel - knowing that YOU did the wrenching and that you've learned so much in the process....unless you're drag race dedicated, who cares, but look at how much you've gained! Beautiful car, sounds/feels great, and you're a genuine advisor now for all these newbees wanting to do headers...
Yeah Bobby, you really needed a baseline readout. In your case, you DIYed the install, then dynoed, so you cannot know the actual gain.
But as you've said (and I agree)...who cares....if you're looking for personal satisfaction - the sound - the feel - knowing that YOU did the wrenching and that you've learned so much in the process....unless you're drag race dedicated, who cares, but look at how much you've gained! Beautiful car, sounds/feels great, and you're a genuine advisor now for all these newbees wanting to do headers...
Me an advisor oh Lord watch out
Originally Posted by Dcasole
Bobby, I am going to send u the money to get it done over on a different dyno lol lol lol
Dave
None in town Dave so save your moolah. I know what it feels like and I live thru your Track times
Personally I like lower dyno number so people get confused when the lower horse power car is faster. Take it to the track and see what it traps. That'll give you a better idea how the car is running.
The only real dyno number is YOUR before and after, done the same day, just after they did the mods.
The same day? How are you supposed to achieve that when you put a cam, exhaust and heads on your car? That part of your statement is very extreme. Using the same dyno gets you pretty much the results you need to find the differences in go fast parts.
The same day? How are you supposed to achieve that when you put a cam, exhaust and heads on your car? That part of your statement is very extreme. Using the same dyno gets you pretty much the results you need to find the differences in go fast parts.
On the same day isn't really necessary and as you pointed out, is often not feasible.
As long as before/after runs are on the same dyno and have generally the same atmospheric conditions (temps/humidity/air pressure), the before/after comparison will have merit. Same conditions can often (not always) be pretty much replicated if the dyno runs are conducted at about the same time of day aon different days.
Hell.....atmospheric conditions can change significantly in the course of a couple of hours.....
KW
Last edited by KW Baraka; Jul 31, 2017 at 09:23 PM.