QTP Electric Cut Outs Installed
Now have 3 options:
1) Quiet
2) Respectable rumble
3) Wake the neighborhood!

Not a lot of room in a C6 for cut outs. Most position near the trans and leaf spring. However, with an automatic there is even less room than with a stick. I had to go to plan B. Looking around, seemed the best (only) location was before the X pipe. I did lose about 1.5” of ground clearance. Would be almost flush if you didn’t use the electric controllers. Haven’t scraped on anything yet.
I’m really pleased with the sound, a low rumble. Not extremely loud. I guess because the exhaust has gone through the cats. No popping or backfire at deceleration. Not near as loud as my C3 with mid length headers and extensions.
I didn’t want to drill holes or install switches so I used a remote control, Velcroed to the firewall near the battery.
Now I can please the wife when cruising around and impress my buddies too!
With dumps and extensions only.
With electrically controlled butterfly valves installed
The bolts do look like they may be overkill, LOL. A sound clip wont really do it justice but I will send one. Its not as loud as I expected. Probably because the cut outs only channel some of the exhaust out the side of the pipes. The installer welded the extensions on from the inside then cut out the original pipe leaving a lip and a smaller hole. I'm considering removing the exhaust, grinding off the lip to enlarge the opening and having it welded from the outside. Should make it flow better but it will likely be louder.
Inside cut out
Do you have headers? I think with headers you can’t put them where you have them, but headers will make them a lot louder if you could get them to fit. A cam will make it a lot louder too but without headers a cam is limited.
Here is my setup from so long ago with videos.
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-on-my-c6.html
Last edited by Joe_G; Aug 25, 2017 at 02:50 PM.
Do you have headers? I think with headers you can’t put them where you have them, but headers will make them a lot louder if you could get them to fit. A cam will make it a lot louder too but without headers a cam is limited.
Here is my setup from so long ago with videos.
https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...-on-my-c6.html

I'm interested to see the difference at the track. I noticed my mileage improving as the computer adjusted to the increased air flow. I’m wondering if it confuses the computer opening and closing the exhaust. I may need to run with the cuts outs open for a while, prior to a track run, to let the computer tune for best performance.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts






Very clean
Thanks,Matt
Keep in mind that running around with them open will cause your computer to correct fueling in open loop, keeping fueling at 14.7. But, in open loop (such as when at WOT) the computer commands about 11.5 with no feedback on corrections. You might gain a couple of hp from the cutouts but since you have NPP already it won’t be much, your exhaust is quite free flowing from the factory with NPP.
Long winded answer to say don’t get your hopes up for much if any performance gain from the cutouts since you have NPP based on my dyno experience over the years.
But, enjoy the sound! I like cutouts because they direct the sound to the ground where the deep bass sounds great. And you can hear them in the car much more than you can the NPP. One of my favorite mods!
By the way I have pics of my friend’s QTP install on his automatic, he is in Sweden and he had to create some Sweden craftsmanship to make the cutouts work with an automatic. If Photobucket wouldn’t be holding me hostage I could show you.
. It wasn’t easy as you noted!
Thanks for the info. I'm learning more about these computers all the time. Are you saying the car goes out of closed loop at WOT and the computer doesn’t make any adjustments? I always thought the computer was the reason the LS cars I raced against were so inconsistent on ETs while my carbureted 383 ran within .02 every pass.
Thanks for the info. I'm learning more about these computers all the time. Are you saying the car goes out of closed loop at WOT and the computer doesn’t make any adjustments? I always thought the computer was the reason the LS cars I raced against were so inconsistent on ETs while my carbureted 383 ran within .02 every pass.
LS engines have a significant timing reduction table based on inlet air temp in the stock tune, up to 12 degrees of timing starting at 86 degrees IAT. Your IAT will go up from say ambient of 80 degrees to 150 while waiting in the lanes and the car will pull 12 degrees of timing. That's why they are often so inconsistent.
Good bracket racers that race LS cars and use the stock tune know this and they will let their cars get good and hot before each pass, then the IAT will be as hot as it gets (around 150 degrees from my scans) and they will just race at about ½ of normal commanded timing. It hurts their ET but they are consistent.
Most tuners recommend a cold air intake and they reduce the inlet air timing reduction table until really hot, like 130 degrees which you don't see when you have cold air intake.
Last edited by Joe_G; Aug 29, 2017 at 06:34 PM.

LS engines have a significant timing reduction table based on inlet air temp in the stock tune, up to 12 degrees of timing starting at 86 degrees IAT. Your IAT will go up from say ambient of 80 degrees to 150 while waiting in the lanes and the car will pull 12 degrees of timing. That's why they are often so inconsistent.
Good bracket racers that race LS cars and use the stock tune know this and they will let their cars get good and hot before each pass, then the IAT will be as hot as it gets (around 150 degrees from my scans) and they will just race at about ½ of normal commanded timing. It hurts their ET but they are consistent.
Most tuners recommend a cold air intake and they reduce the inlet air timing reduction table until really hot, like 130 degrees which you don't see when you have cold air intake.












